Both Panzer IV and T3485 have 140 - 150mm of armor pen.
Panther has close to 200mm of pen.
Both Panzer IV and T3485 have 140 - 150mm of armor pen.
Panther has close to 200mm of pen.
And ? So T34-85 is more than capable to deal with BR4 tanks it faces.
Infact even the BR3 t-34(-41) can 1shot panther.
So for what exact reason is this necessary at BR3 ? Is it worse than T34-85 ? Absolutely, but if we go with this logic, either Tiger’s should be BR4 and panthers BR3 or viceversa, and all PZ4’s BR2 because 99% of time the next unlock is always better than the previous.
That however for obvious reasons doesnt mean its place is in BR3.
Unless theres a valid reason to have SU-85 at BR3 ? Which I cant think of since theres plenty of BR3 tanks capable to deal with uptiering.
Marders reason for BR2 is the uptiering against KV & Shermans where majority of other BR2 fails miserably.
Yeah, I guessed as much, you cant think.
Panther should be BR3 is your excuse?
Almost every one here agrees that having no turret, no MG or being op top qualifies a vehicle with a good gun to be lowered in BR.
The main gun of a tank is NOT the only criteria of BR placement.
If your argument lowering SU is that its worse than T34 at BR4, then how come same doesnt apply to panther ?
This is ridiculous argument, majority of high end GE tree should be lowered because theres always something better.
SU is just as capable as T34 to kill other tanks in BR4, regardless it is worse. That just is how progression is made in the game.
99% of time you unlock better things.
While considering Sig as BR3 tank due to having good gun but absolutely nothing else.
Except if its GE tank ?
Dude, Panther has a BR5 gun with BR5 frontal armor, but BR4 turret armor. By opinion of most on this forum Panther is BR4 because of its bad mobility - which makes sense, it has 3mph max reverse speed.
Also majority of current Soviet tanks can NOT penetrate Neither Tiger nor Panther frontally.
Exceptions are KV2 and T34 57.
SU85M is worthless, its armor would be OP in BR3, but in BR4 there is zero reason to use it - which is the entire reason for this discussion, regular SU85 has like half its frontal armor, which would be totally fair in BR3. This logic is completely reasonable.
If you really think SU85 would be unfair in BR3 I have no words left for you except “skill issue” - which does not come lightly from me.
so 88 gun is BR 7 ?
Funny that you mention KV2, a tank with actual survivability is BR3 but sig is BR3 only because of the gun.
And here we go again.
KT 2 P should be BR4 because due to H theres no reason to use it ?
You get how ridiculous that argument is ?
And I ask again, for what exact reason is it needed in BR3 ? As shown above, the soviet tanks are more capable to deal with uptier.
If they werent, you would have a point.
Above screens.
Bro does not have reading comprehension or logical reasoning or even experience yet he’s so confident
What tank are you using in those pictures?
t-34 1941
Tiger II has almost 250mm of pen, which would be the equivalent of BR6 fire power, Tiger II H cant be penned by majority of BR4 tanks, while Tiger II P actually can. Funnily the difference between Tiger II P and Panther is quite small when fighting in BR4.
I dont know what kind of pixel hunting you are doing, but that tank does not have 100mm of penetration.
Stop being dishonest
Machine gun port which is incredibly hard shot to make esp in games lol as the German mg ports a are especially small in fact so small that ppl don’t even go for it in wt and instead go for the barrel
And how many tanks there is with so thick armor ?
Well I cant pen KV with majority of BR2 tanks either.
mg port, relatively easy as it shows green even from far away.
Id say GE BR2 tanks struggles with BR3 tanks too so, for what exact reason pixel hunting should be exclusively a GE problem ?
Kv can be penned by pretty much all tanks it faces even angled except chi nu lol
Also stop bringing that tank up all the time, this isnt about this vehicle at all.
If you think that it was an unjustified nerf I will agree with you, though I can understand the opposite side since it reload very fast.
Also this has nothing to do with Germanies SPG being treated badly - we just had Jagdpanzer IV L70 being moved to BR4, which actually many people here on the forum disagreed with.
Me personally I’d love to see the hetzer at br 3 in the future. Which has more armor than the su85 and similar gun performance and a mg……
If “because gun” applies to sig, id say its only fair it applies to SU too.
And as earlier mentioned tank shouldnt be considered by gun alone.
Yet thats exactly what sig got.
Sure, but as above said. If this applies to other tank it should apply others too.
150mm vs 85mm……
Yeah I think this guy genuinely just has never touched a tank in this game.
Ridiculous argument. I am so done talking to you, I would claim that you have no idea what you are talking about, but you obviously try to be dishonest with you ridiculous claims. You know exactly what you are talking about.
“Regular T34 can very easily take out every Panther, by hitting 1% of its frontal surface area”
Yeah sure thing, you are so full of it, I cant believe it.
I am the first that claims KV1 being OP, but I also claim Panther specifically being OP.
Also how many times have been talking about STUG III F moving to BR2?
But what ever, your nonsense argument make my blood boil again, people like you that bring up constant BS argument for the sake of arguing are so annoying.
85mm is a BR4 gun and needs to stay in BR4? Guess what, it doesn’t matter what you say. Almost everyone disagrees with you anyways - luckily.