Ah The classic “preach water and drink wine” move. Very historical.
Also still not sure how that excuses the Mkb 35 when it wasnt even used to begin with.
The game also doesnt force you to use the Mkb 35.
But flying over D-Day with the Whirland or the Chi-Nu on literally any map surely makes more historical sense, let alone the Chi-Nu II.
The underlying “I am always the victim” BS makes such erratic accusations a case for psychiatric care, not only pseudo-admins & moderators, as it is recurrent harassment without any provocation. Could also telltale a follow-up pattern of crime against their “supposed Bad Guys”.
I leave game i dont wanna play. Not my fault if Enlisted dont give players choices of maps and game types. I wont play demo defend or defend 2 points. Too damn bad if I leave.
Your claim is all over the place.
But you didnt use the T-28 in Berlin so it makes stuff like Mkb35, Type 4, the Chi Nu’s and whatnot historical again.
Because that aint Fortnite BS.
My overall point was rather that you ultimately dont care about historical accuracy and uses a lot of ahistorical stuff and your excuse with theater also doesnt work well with stuff like the Mkb.
You have said that because Panther being 4 that we can’t have BRIV tunisia… yet you use equipment that wasn’t in the theatre it was present or used at all… that’s hypocritical… you have definitely given the impression you only use historical laodouts… and care so much when X is in X campaign where it wasn’t irl… yet you do it yourself.
I have never said that because that’s virtually impossible in this game.
We have weapons from all kinds of eras and campaigns across all BRs.
I might take M3 Grease Gun and M24 Chaffee in my Normandy loadout and end up in North Africa where none of that was used, I might have Volkssturm loadout with VG 1-5 and MP 3008 and want to defend Berlin but end up in Moscow.
Leaving 99% of matches because we don’t have map selector would be just wasting time.
But certain BRs such as BR4 with Panthers and 76mm Shermans clearly don’t belong in Tunisia.
Similarly just as high BR Stalingrad/Rzhev and low BR Berlin are full BS and I choose to leave those matches in 100% of cases.
If Enlisted starts to bring some Maps from the Indian, Malayan, Indonesian, Papua New Guinean, Hong Kong, Burmese, Aleutian, Pacific, Indochina there would Help and maybe rework some Pacific Maps to its Historical Accurate Peak then bringing more TT stuff for BR 1, BR 2 would help Against the Neglection of Japan
Too much work, when they can’t even hotfix the existing maps. Plus: The game should have colorblind-modes. For me, it ain’t snowblind, but the Asian jungles make me get headaches and only see a green-beige blur after a while…
Mission TYPE selector also would remedy plenty of wasted time mission failures! Myself? Never for assault jobs, too slow, too leaned back. Others can’t wait, so stormtrooper jobs are easier to them.
I’d rather deal with destruction on normandy maps or berlin than anything on tractor plant or quarry. Both would be great but I feel map selection, or at least the system actually banning maps instead of barely lowering the chance to get them, would be the better option should only one be added.
Your logic is idiotic… there are already things that aren’t present in the certain theatres… you just don’t want people who enjoy higher tiers to play on those maps.
Not what that is saying. That is an opinion on why Veekay opposes adding BR4 to Tunisia based on the weaponry not a pledge to only use historical equipment for different theatres, which you can’t choose nor customize loadouts for specific maps.
And BR4-5 Tunisia would be genuine torture but that discussion isn’t part of this suggestion.
Seems the player base is large enough to support it, they just need more game modes that generate xp so people can go do what they actually want to do.
Dedicated open servers like the other shooters that gave xp players can go pick maps that they want hop it kill stuff hop out get xp. Maybe a ladder for competitive and historical modes with limited loadouts like WT.