If Enlisted starts to bring some Maps from the Indian, Malayan, Indonesian, Papua New Guinean, Hong Kong, Burmese, Aleutian, Pacific, Indochina there would Help and maybe rework some Pacific Maps to its Historical Accurate Peak then bringing more TT stuff for BR 1, BR 2 would help Against the Neglection of Japan
Too much work, when they can’t even hotfix the existing maps. Plus: The game should have colorblind-modes. For me, it ain’t snowblind, but the Asian jungles make me get headaches and only see a green-beige blur after a while… ![]()
Mission TYPE selector also would remedy plenty of wasted time mission failures!
Myself? Never for assault jobs, too slow, too leaned back. Others can’t wait, so stormtrooper jobs are easier to them.
I’d rather deal with destruction on normandy maps or berlin than anything on tractor plant or quarry. Both would be great but I feel map selection, or at least the system actually banning maps instead of barely lowering the chance to get them, would be the better option should only one be added.
Are you sure about that?
Your logic is idiotic… there are already things that aren’t present in the certain theatres… you just don’t want people who enjoy higher tiers to play on those maps.
Not what that is saying. That is an opinion on why Veekay opposes adding BR4 to Tunisia based on the weaponry not a pledge to only use historical equipment for different theatres, which you can’t choose nor customize loadouts for specific maps.
And BR4-5 Tunisia would be genuine torture but that discussion isn’t part of this suggestion.
No ideal what this is
Seems the player base is large enough to support it, they just need more game modes that generate xp so people can go do what they actually want to do.
Dedicated open servers like the other shooters that gave xp players can go pick maps that they want hop it kill stuff hop out get xp. Maybe a ladder for competitive and historical modes with limited loadouts like WT.
Your communication skills are idiotic.
If you expect people to treat you not like an idiot, learn how to communicate in a decent way.
Also, your screenshot doesn’t make any f’ sense.
Couldn’t care less how you treat me or what you think of me… if that wasn’t evident by my interactions on this forum… and you shouldn’t either considering you continue to spew your opinion which is irrelevant wherever possible.
Maybe you should learn how to quote properly and i wouldn’t have thought you were denying your statement on why BRIV tunisia shouldn’t be added.
This is going in a rather bad direction… say what you will and i will agree that my way of communicating is also somewhat idiotic and rude… but i really cannot think of any other way to describe your way of thinking… and if its portrayed in such a way i suppose i should keep it to myself.
Them not wanting BRIV tunisia because it could include panthers and m4a1 76 is a correlation to their inability to let go of how it was pre merge… it makes absolutely zero sense… there are already instances of stuff you can bring where they weren’t even close to their theatre… which is why i continue to say their opinion on that topic is idiotic… there is no other way to describe it.
And power wise? Panther wouldn’t be nearly as bad as long 88.
I do realize now he wasn’t disagreeing with me stating that but that he thinks historical equip
ent should be the only thing in game and he is also being disingenuous in that case… continues to complain about minuscule things of that aspect it has given me the impression that’s how he plays.
Yknow… this is beyond the topic of this conversation… however i couldn’t help myself from pointing out their again idiotic logic from the original comment saying they wouldn’t desert if (like i’ve been saying continuously) if they weren’t sent in X campaign using X equipment… you don’t get to draw a line on it either with jets etc… it’s just as stupid.
Instead of punishing those who leave the battle, please reward those who fought until the very end.
Consider the players who kept fighting even after four teammates marked with controller icons disappeared right at the start; the player who earned over 100 Engineer score alone and was the only one on the team to build rally points; or the players who were crushed by KV-1s in a bottom-tier match against the Soviet side.
The fact that these players receive no special recognition or rewards, while the developers simply keep saying, “Fight! Fight! Fight! Never retreat!” is nothing more than laziness on the part of the developers.
is simply a sign of the developers’ unwillingness to properly address the problem.
I play on Console aswell and i Stay in Fights to the very End, some Gamemodes are Nuts like A,B,C which is why i Disliked every Map that Contains that Gamemode
Neat words! You are aware that they will envy and hate you for this, right? ![]()
Friend, that’s a great idea. However, given Enlisted’s current tech tree system, I think it would be better to stick to the chronological approach used in the old historical campaign mode—spanning from the Battle of Moscow (1941) to the Battle of Berlin (1945).
