So i know some of you know that the Rage Quitters, New Comers and so on are leaving Ingame matches which makes it [Interesting] how the Match end so that some Ideas could Quitting go less bad , the Idea is so that the BR gets Changed (once more) but this time that the BR Tech trees of all Nations will be firstly Adjusted as example the Type 100 smg Paratrooper will be given to the Japanese Paratroopers while the Bipod Type 100 Smg will be given to the Japanese Medics. All Techtree Weapons has to be adjusted on the Techtrees like some BR 1 Rifles are on BR 2 meanwhile some Tanks are on BR3 but on the BR 4 Template which has to be Changed.
Should the Techtree of all Nations be Redone and Fixed?
- Yes because that is really getting Messy
- I dont know if really needed
- No it should be how it Already is
After that done we’re go to the Gameplay Mess. The Playerbase doesnt really care about the Free XP they’re Missing out and the Teamplay which makes some Quit the First seconds, the Idea there now is that the Player has to cooperate with their Team like Using APC, Anti Tank, Medic Packs, getting Healed, Building Anti Air, Shooting down Tanks and Planes, Building Ammo Chests, Using the Onbuild Ammo Box of the Motorcycles, Spawnpoints, etc, has the Team the Chance of both Sides to Win or Lose Fair and Square but those Ammo Boxes, Medic Boxes, Motorcycle Medic/Ammo Bixes should getting if used more XP as example 50XP every use of those.
Should the Gameplay XP be Changed? or Not
- Yes that could make it Fair
- Maybe some Adjustments
- Absolutely Not
Now for the Last Part we go about the Vehicles.
The Tanks, Motorcycles, Amphipious Vehicles, APC, Airplanes are sometimes weird with their Ammo or Armor that could be fixed if each Type gets Overworked and Looked more if there are any Problems that has to be done as example and we all know the KV 1 and others that either the Armor is Paper thin but the Game doesnt Recogise it much or that the Build MG starts to Jump up or that the Cross of the MG, Tanks, Planes, APC, etc isnt in the Right way how the Devs thought off. So have a good day everybody and be Fair of your Team mates.
1 Like
The solutions to desertions:
- Make the map up/down vote actually work.
- Isolate BR1 and BR 5 matchmaking to +/- 0.
35 Likes
Thanks when i wrote the Suggestion i had Forgot about those two and i would say they should be there aswell to make it even more Fairer
I forgot:
- Stacks should only play against other stacks.
It is such a massive advantage when a team is actually coordinating. I recently experienced a VERY short invasion defense game where artillery and attacker plane would hit the point at the same time, just as a tank pulled into view and started firing and 5+ full-strength squads rushed the point impact-grenade first from all directions. Just COMPLETE coordination. While my entire team was standing NEAR the point, or basically 10m from the spawn points.
I was 1st place on my team with 44 kills and 2 vehicle kills, which is definitely a problem.
There was also a guy who must have just gotten his first hammer. He had 45+ wrench score, but it was all just filling the final point with barbed wire, like FILLING it, to where you couldn’t defend the point.
And twice some other Jangus built sandbags in the only doorway out of a room with a rally in it that couldn’t be traversed by bots (and BARELY by players by trying to duck/jump over it).
On the plus side, i think it might actually have been a full BR1 game for a change, though i guess that’s because the BR2 players i usually get uptiered against decided to team up and swat me in BR1 instead.
/Rant
9 Likes
Since matchmaking doesn’t seem to want to pull in players to existing matches that had a lot of deserters, just give a big XP + silver boost to those who stay to incentivize them to stick it out. Just add a visual or audio cue to let them know what’s going on.
Could even flavor it by having the announcer say something like “The bolsheviks outnumber us, steel your resolve, fur das vaterland!” or “By order of comrade Stalin, not one step backwards!” and start playing some wynorrific (<— new word i just learned lol) music to fit the hopeless mood.
2 Likes
To make sure I’m not just being a sour patch kid, i looked up the match in question (I don’t claim to be good, I’m aggressively mediocre, hence why me being #1 with <50 kills is a really bad sign for the team), and yeah, the same 3 guys appear together in a ton of games (not sure if replays shows the team lineups or not, but am away from my computer so can’t check now).
Whenever i get a match like that, especially first one of the day, i usually tune out for a day or 2. It’s really super bad for new player engagement/retention to have your noob solo players team get curb-stomped by a coordinated 3-man team in BR1.
Yes it does, but you cant distinguish whether the a group was premade or open (gathered from other players with an open party)
3 Likes
I’d start here. I think it’s the largest plank Enlisted could put in place to prevent the ship from sinking any further…
9 Likes
I do think BR 1 has to be BR 1 Only because lets be real you all like i dont want seeing BR 2 Weapon/Vehicles while ya Still BR 1 Equipped…
4 Likes
For this particular game i checked their names against other games, and they’re frequently playing together, so purposefully teamed up.
To be fair, i have nothing against them, they’re playing within the rules. The problem is teamed-up guys, probably voice chatting on discord, have a massive advantage in a game with no in-game chat and no easy way to team up or coordinate.
They shouldn’t be able to match-make with a full team of solo players.
3 Likes
I suggest that the Enlisted developers replace the current tier system with a chronological approach based on when equipment was introduced: for instance, 1941 corresponds to Tier I gear, 1942 to Tier II, 1943 to Tier III, 1944 to Tier IV, and 1945 to Tier V. This would not only add a sense of WWII historical authenticity but also help players understand which weapons belong to which era, preventing situations where newcomers armed with 1941-era gear end up in Tier V matches facing 1945-era equipment.
3 Likes
Wouldnt it be better if Started 1937 and end to 1945? There were muvh Equipment the Italians, French, British, UdSSR, Canadian, South African, Yugoslavian, Greek, Romanian, Polish, Hungarian, Danish, Norwegian used
1 Like
I would literally never desert if the MM didn’t send me to Berlin with T-28 or Stalingrad with jets.
1 Like
If we had enough players for 5 separate BR queues, I’d rather have BR 1-2, BR 2-3, BR 3-4, BR 4-5 and BR 6 (fantasy, balanced, Ho Ri 2017, Su-9 1946) than ±0.
1 Like
Do you really Consider having it so as Example:
Your Playing BR 1 and you see people using BR 2 Weapons you then think why am i in a Game with BR 2 people that have Equipment which are Stronger, Faster, Resistante against Anti Tank Rifles or AT Guns? The Same goes for BR 2 then BR 3 and so on i support the Idea what the Commentor said about Dividing the BRs for Several Reasons and other Question would you really if you First Start your Game and being New wanna Fight against the British Crusaders, Stuarts and others?
You dont have to have BR 2 Stuff when ya didnt even Purchased those BR 2 and other to be BR 2 you Instantly get thrown into a Match that isnt Harder than it should be
Most people leave the game in the beginning of the match when they get a map or mode that they don’t wanna spend time on, best solution would be making map voting work or completely rework it.
1 Like
most of the time when i quit matches it because i hate conquest and i dont want to play conquest
3 Likes
