Sorry I’m trying to get the game improved after 4 YEARS OF COMPLAINING THAT WENT IGNORED
All thanks to a couple of dudes that are too ignorant to care or do hoops of mental gymnastics to justify having twice the TTK because of a cosmetic because they are afraid to let go of their crutches
Is your ego healing after hearing the devs have pampered you in your delusion after being clowned on by everyone?
why is it so unreasonable to ask to add a movement penalty to wearing a gigantic metal breastplate lol. The less superhuman the soldiers are, the better
In reality, nobody should have to be pushing the body armor agenda now because it should have been addressed a couple years ago. Either every faction has it or no faction should have it, that is just common sense.
No, that’s dull 1:1 approach to balance. On contrary, other factions should have their own personal gimmicks.
It’s funny how nobody complains about Japanese rally points being significantly smaller, them having access to unlimited number of swords and very potent lunge mine (if used correctly).
Body armor issue is probably the most overrated made up problem the community has ever came up with.
Probably because everyone has rallies.
You also do not see people complaining (much) that Soviet AA reloads faster due to loader despite other AA guns also having spots for loaders.
Swords only affect players while equipped and swords are not excatly great for ranged encounters. But sure, add swords for other factions I guess.
Which were bugged for half of their existence and TNT is still better all things considered.
It’s 3 soldiers on an overpriced premium squad that basically nobody buys. We could distribute it to everybody for free and then shift the balance problem over to the USA and let them deal with body armor instead /s
Again, I think its very ridiculous to wear such a heavy item and move completely unimpeded. It’s not super critical issue that makes the game unplayable. It’s a poor balance choice that should be reconsidered by the developers.
There’s no reason at all to NOT use body armor. It is objectively the correct choice to equip it because it increases survivability at no downside.
I believe that there should never be a clear-cut correct choice for what to use in a game. There should be alternatives, with pro’s and con’s, that make designing your loadout a thoughtful and more involved process, not having two choices with one labeled RIGHT and one labeled WRONG
It’s all been said here before but adding some weight to it all won’t hurt… The body armor discussion has been happening for years and it’s the perfect time to address and finally fix it now. I can’t fathom how the developers wouldn’t be able to perceive that fact, seize the chance and solve it once and for all, especially since Japan is very likely to be negatively affected by having to fight against body armor. It’s painting the devs in a really bad light, especially since they’re aware of the problem but are willing to leave it to fester and plague another nation.
Considering this had been an on-going topic for years now, its completely up to the devs to give us the “go” for when it actually makes finally sense to discuss this properly.
Well, I think there should be “faction specific” squad types - a special soviet exclusive combat pioneer squad would make alot of sense historically speaking, cuz thats were those armors were actually used.
Pioneers with armor + SMGs
Germany could get Panzergrenadiers, AT soldiers with SMGs.
Brits could get commandos - Guerillas with AT launchers
If your entire input is going to be ‘oh you are obsessed’ and ‘its not that big of a deal because my vibes tell me so’ then spare everyone the pleasure of your company