Probably because everyone has rallies.
You also do not see people complaining (much) that Soviet AA reloads faster due to loader despite other AA guns also having spots for loaders.
Swords only affect players while equipped and swords are not excatly great for ranged encounters. But sure, add swords for other factions I guess.
Which were bugged for half of their existence and TNT is still better all things considered.
Democracy sucks. Nerf MG34.
We also have body armor on the motorcycle squad 
So yeah Japan has so many secret advantages xD
Itâs 3 soldiers on an overpriced premium squad that basically nobody buys. We could distribute it to everybody for free and then shift the balance problem over to the USA and let them deal with body armor instead /s
Well this explains why no one complains since the Japanese advantages are so insignificant that no one really cares.
Again, I think its very ridiculous to wear such a heavy item and move completely unimpeded. Itâs not super critical issue that makes the game unplayable. Itâs a poor balance choice that should be reconsidered by the developers.
Thereâs no reason at all to NOT use body armor. It is objectively the correct choice to equip it because it increases survivability at no downside.
I believe that there should never be a clear-cut correct choice for what to use in a game. There should be alternatives, with proâs and conâs, that make designing your loadout a thoughtful and more involved process, not having two choices with one labeled RIGHT and one labeled WRONG
Itâs all been said here before but adding some weight to it all wonât hurt⌠The body armor discussion has been happening for years and itâs the perfect time to address and finally fix it now. I canât fathom how the developers wouldnât be able to perceive that fact, seize the chance and solve it once and for all, especially since Japan is very likely to be negatively affected by having to fight against body armor. Itâs painting the devs in a really bad light, especially since theyâre aware of the problem but are willing to leave it to fester and plague another nation.
Considering this had been an on-going topic for years now, its completely up to the devs to give us the âgoâ for when it actually makes finally sense to discuss this properly.
that is easy
Then remove it if it doesnât matter, the only reason why it keeps coming up is because it is obviously an unfair advantage.
wrong, you can only have 3 APCs on a map at any given time.
You can spawn the squad without the apc since its infantry squad.
Well, I think there should be âfaction specificâ squad types - a special soviet exclusive combat pioneer squad would make alot of sense historically speaking, cuz thats were those armors were actually used.
Pioneers with armor + SMGs
Germany could get Panzergrenadiers, AT soldiers with SMGs.
Brits could get commandos - Guerillas with AT launchers
Or what ever
If your entire input is going to be âoh you are obsessedâ and âits not that big of a deal because my vibes tell me soâ then spare everyone the pleasure of your company
Cool idea but it sucks that its just a skin
Yak-3 is an useless plane without any bombs and is low on ammo
Most of people will just unlock it to expand on collection only
You joke nowâŚ
But wait til it happens to you too! 
Nice little event. If only Enlisted had support for joystick and TrackIR, I could even fly planes sometimes.
Still soft by French Canadian standards.
They swear/cuss every 3 words when they are:
- angry.
- happy.
- tired.
- energic.
- not even caring (yep, still then).
Must be from their tough lumberjacks ancestry.
I know this topic is entirely pointless, butâŚ
It wasnât like this always. & if being able to spawn without a vehicle is a defining trait, then it doesnt apply to bikes.