The M/26-32 performs well; the 1919A6/A4 and Bren 100 are definitely in need of buffs by comparison

Suggestions Weapons
1

56a1326611923e0a2859ad3ee3022591
56a1326611923e0a2859ad3ee3022591696×1139 189 KB

9725c75c2e7ed9da517e623489961115
9725c75c2e7ed9da517e623489961115651×1152 162 KB

690bc83e831db85cba56f25cc779729c
690bc83e831db85cba56f25cc779729c657×1161 183 KB

575741f1f66195b45101cddcceddf8e7
546d107e98ea26dc0227530e0fd3c110
d04eb0a34cafbf5b3c0252f7c7936b0b
d04eb0a34cafbf5b3c0252f7c7936b0b1368×879 223 KB

As a new battle pass weapon, the M/26-32 inherits all the strengths of the base M/26. It’s more mobile than most machine guns with low moving-aim penalty; I’m not sure about its aim-down-sight speed. Even with a fire rate of only 500 RPM, it’s fully competent as a BR 3 firearm.

To put it simply: after investing 2 yellow skill points to unlock the 30% reduced moving ADS penalty perk, this gun is viable for shooting while strafing.

By contrast, the 1919A6 and Bren 100 only boast an extra 25 rounds and a 30–50 higher fire rate, yet they’re burdened with all the typical machine gun debuffs. This balance feels unfair. What’s more, even without any soldier skills equipped, the M/26-32 already outperforms the Bren 100 in stability on the shooting range.

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
2 Likes
2

I’m really glad the devs made a weapon that’s completely different from the MG 34. I’ll slot it into my assault loadout to replace the MG 34, but don’t forget to buff the older battle pass and tech tree weapons too.