The gunfire recoil of the paid 43M squad is significantly higher than the panel data, and it should be adjusted back to the same level of recoil as the research tree’s pull-up force
Although the paid-for recoil system 43M is equipped with a folding stock, it should still increase vertical recoil and ballistic dispersion. It should not exhibit horizontal recoil that is significantly greater than the panel data and the scientific research version of the recoil system. The horizontal recoil should be readjusted, similar to the Fedorov 25, to rebalance the recoil should be readjusted accordingly
Do you agree to adjust the level of recoil force after adjusting the paid pull force
It would have helped if you at least mentioned the full weapon name once so everybody doesnt have it/isnt paying that much attention to the game knows what you are talking about.
Premium
TT
And yes the Horizontal should be lowered. 16 is rather annoying to play with
I don’t understand why the Kiraly 39M is a Battle Rating 4 (BR4) submachine gun; personally, I don’t think it’s bad. Some people say they never encounter it in battle, but I see it often when playing against BR3.It’s even better than the Thompson for leveling up at BR 4.
Since I am working outside and can’t open my computer to provide screenshots, I haven’t sent them. I just want to thank you, my friend, for providing the pictures
I think most if not all weapons that change the stock have different recoil values. Here are two other examples. The M-50 and M-55 are basically the same smg.
M50 Reising the maximum rate of fire with the 20-round magazine was the same 750–850 rounds per minute.
The Reising M50’s low rate of fire in Enlisted (only 500–570 rounds per minute instead of the actual 750–850) stems from two key reasons: game balance and confusion in historical documents.
