no one plays BR IV.
The way the system counts the BR of the battles is by counting the equipment with the highest BR on the match.
Since BR IV is usually uptiered, that counts towards BR V category.
BR III and BR IV matches count as BR IV matches in these statistics. We can deduce that one or two BR IV players cannot make a difference since Allies and USSR dominates too hard.
Well its not surprising you need to Open a lot of gold chests to have playable BR IV build vs BR V. No matter how cracked you are on BR IV against BR V you will have hard times. BR IV is absolutely dead BR.
It’s one of my favorite brs to play for russia and germany. U.s. ain’t there yet still. Does require a lot of bp/event stuff though to fight br5 well. No premmy stuff needed, just adds a bit of extra flavor, like the akt 40. Federov mg is fun, but not necessary. Hardly use it.
Its fun to play until you start getting BR V matches full of full automatic weapons. I love playing BR IV with all factions but simply there is very big gap between weapons and vehicles to call this matches balanced.
Pointless comparison then as Meteor no longer has access to 2x 1000 lbs so what was your intention to bring it up in the first place when we were talking about the F-80 and Me 262 in comparison?
Make it make sense then. I’m having a difficulty to understand what you are even trying to say here to the point that i have been literally trying to deciphering your ‘english’ writings. Make use of a better translator would be a good start for once.
That sounds like a skill issue. I don’t like using this word but i can’t find a better word than the skill issue to describe for the claim that 50 cal is shittier than Mk 108 30mm on air to air combat against fast and agile targets.
Yea, you are talking out of your ass at this point. I never lost to Me 262 in my F-80 unless they got behind me while i was distracted by other things. If you really think that 262 with 30mm is actually better than F-80 then i’m all available. We can duel in a custom game, let’s see how much you’d do well in your Me 262. I have a high expectation, you must be so good with Mk 108 30mm that you’d hit me right away while i’m doing merge evasion on head-on course in my F-80. This is something that even the veteran Warthunder air player are having a hard time to pull off on their Me 262 against F-80 doing merge evasion but you must be so much better than them, talking about learn and anticipation huh. 
We discussed the weakness of the F80
I gave an example of what it’s weak about, but the fact that the bombs are different is a small thing and not as strong a nerf as we would like.
All planes are good, all planes are important, and I still don’t understand the argument.
Another Germany main crying because supposedly Germany is weak HAHAHAHA THE NORM IN THIS DISGUSTING FORUM
That’s how German players are; they want the best for themselves and not for everyone else. They complain about EVERYTHING like the crybabies they are, but they don’t see all that they have. But that’s the general attitude of the Anglo-Saxon forum; everyone is like that.
I think the Marder Tanks on BR2 are balanced for the most part, they’re open top like other BR2 TDs
Such as? All you did say was F-80 is weaker than Meteor that’s it. Hardly an example.
Brother, what are you even talking about? Having a different bomb loadout absolutely freaking matters. In fact, it’s the most important thing when it comes to the choice of airplane. The reason that why some of the fighters without any bombs or much weaker bombs on their BR basically never been used despite some of them have a really good flight performance and offensive armament such as Spitfire Mk. Vb etc etc is literally that.
This applies for every players who biased for their favorite faction, not something unique. But i’ll admit it that the “germany sufferz” people, no matter the circumstances such as OP here are the loudest and most numerous ones in this forum. And i’m fine with crying and complaining, but i hope they at least bring some objectivity.
Descei
You perfectly described the situation of the incompetent player base of the Allies and Soviets who, even with the help of the Developers, cannot compete against the Faction you hate.
A stupid argument just because it has a less powerful bomb doesn’t make it any less powerful than the P-80, and certainly not less powerful than the Me 262, which has a turn rate of 13 seconds.
Dude, you have nothing to prove to me and that person, everyone has their own opinion on the content in the Game, the fact that you are trying to justify f80 and see advantages in it, it’s not a fact that others will agree with this, for me f80 is a bad Reagent and a plus only in 2 1000f bombs, otherwise I think it’s a scam on money, do you think otherwise? I honestly don’t care, I’m not forbidding you to love him, it’s just that everyone has different opinions, it’s okay.
a strong misconception, however, it’s not for me to dissuade you)
everything is stupid with you until they agree with you)
In out game, just like in WT. it’d be just a worse Tiger 2, because of slow reload and no turret. Camping one sightline is overrated in a game where infantry can easily flank you, and plane spawns are free.
I don’t really care what you think either. Frankly, i don’t even believe that you are capable of being convinced even when the objective truth is right in front of you. Keep denying the objective truth right in front of you with something like “but I think that’s not true” is not just ‘everyone has a different opinion’, you are actively coping and trying to do a disingenuous, bad faith argument.
I think you are basically the same type of people that those who extremely biased towards their favorite faction. You are no different than those “germany sufferz” crowd judging from your usual horrible take, only difference is that you are extremely biased for Soviet and to some extent, USA instead. Your previous history of posts literally proves this. You can say whatever you want here ofc it’s a forum afterall but don’t be surprised when someone call out your so obviously biased BS.
At best, it would be Ho-Ri but worse, mainly due to the much slower reload speed and mobility.
99% of times the Tiger 2 would be just a better choice honestly if you ask me.
It have worse movility yeah but you can’t look at the WT stats for that because they changed them on enlisted It will have the Tiger 2 speed but with the weigth It have It will get slower speed anyway this tanks is basically inmortal to nearly all tanks of the game thats why they shouldn’t add It and Germany already have the best BR5 tank idk why there is people asking for the Jagtiger(not you salty guy)
as I wrote above, I do not single out any favorite faction, my suggestions are based on where I live And what I know a little more than you know about us)and that’s fine, I’ve been in the game for a long time and have my own opinion based on my interests
I’m not denying the power of the f80, I’m denying its power in the absolute, the situations in battle are different, and the victory conditions are different. In terms of maneuverability, yes, it is better than the ME 262, but in terms of armament, I will give preference to the me262.
I also noted that there is a meteor that is better in maneuverability than the f80, that’s all, I do not know why you are angry, everyone really has their own preferences, to condemn for this stupid)