Yes it is an advantage, but it doesnt win you gun fights which is the main point why body armor is so problematic.If soviet body armor damage reduction is removed (Or is only on effect for the Assault engineers) i dont see any reason why japan should have swords by default then, it would finally give the katana a use.
1 Like
Should the VG 1-5 get a damage buff too? Since it shares damage stats with German ARs
i wonder when people will stop using competitive games as reasoning for balance… you can set rules in them yknow… and not every game is 10v10 against competitive enlisted players.
Then what should we set the standard for the balancing instead then? Balance around the game for the bottom 5% players in terms of skill? like hell that would be good for the game.
And? what are you even trying to say here? Even without the rules, the soviet will dominate in every infantry play versus any faction in the game period, given the both side have same or similar skills. Body armor, Zuckerman launcher and RMN-50 spam will be so fun to fight against innit.
2 Likes
No VG is fine as is.
And P47.
1 Like
You are right on some points
The R4M rockets do not have enough TNT to be effective against infantry and tanks.
The same argument can be used with the allies and their fictional weaponry, given to them by the developers to mask their lack of skill in playing and thinking.
1 Like
Well, some of the reasoning behind buffing Germany is confusing to me, and I even disagree with parts of it. Still, I support adding these items to strengthen Germany.
Come to think of it, the American Stinger has only been released twice for such a long time. It’s almost as rare as an endangered species. It probably won’t compete with the T-44-100 in quantities large enough to change the meta.
Honestly, Soviet players are absolutely desperate for the IS-3 and T-44-100.
They badly need versatile all-round tanks on par with the Tiger II.
The funny thing is, their complete War Thunder models are already sitting in the game editor, but they just won’t add them.
I feel like the odds of us ever getting these two tanks are about the same as palliative care for a terminally ill child — slim to none.
For the Soviet plate armor, buffs for Germany should mostly focus on BR 1 and BR 2, giving Germany better submachine guns. When fighting with full-power automatic weapons at close range, Soviet plate armor doesn’t offer much advantage. Instead, the Soviet armor shines more at lower battle ratings.
Also, Soviet players have waited for nearly three years.
Soviet tanks at BR 5 are absolutely terrible. Using aircraft to crash into enemies is even more effective for anti-tank work.
If you get to drive the Tiger II fighting Soviet tanks, count yourself lucky — it’s far easier than fighting American tanks.
American tanks like the Sherman and M26 still can’t use binoculars while peeking out of hatches; they’re clearly being targeted by DF. Oh right, they still don’t have shaped-charge rounds that can penetrate turrets, only solid shot.
That’s really bad.
For now, maps for German forces should be expanded or reworked. Create wider, obstacle-free zones for tank combat, so Ferdinand and Tiger tanks can perform to their full potential.
They shouldn’t be forced into urban combat, where infantry with heavy anti-tank weapons can harass them over and over.
Don’t even get me started on Japan.
I’ve never seen another WWII game that bends reality as much as Enlisted does.
Call of Duty Vanguard probably bends reality more
Is the oposite they have way too manny TNT soo they would be stupidly Broken
For comparison here the 75mm HE Shell of the PZ IV F2
They have nearly the same filler soo nope those rockets can’t get added because 24 and 48 rockets is too much you basically trow 48 75mm HE shells in like 4 secs depend how fast you click and It reload them in like 30 secs turning the plane going to the refill point
Br4 tiger
Br4 mkb 42
Scotti naval
Mas 38
Marder tanks on br2
Solothurn
5 man jeep with 3 mgs (that do almost double the damage of m2 50 cal) and 20mm autocannon for infantry and AA
Wtf are you talking about? They had powercreep from the start and are continuously getting things that are stronger and stronger than other nations?
1 Like
I remember a post from 2-3 years ago where it was debated whether the R4M would be useful, and the answer is no, due to the lack of TNT to create a blast radius and destroy armored vehicles with penetration capabilities.Or overpressure
Well, that argument isn’t valid when the Germans have been bombed with HVARs and 500lb bombs from the P-47 since 2021.
Panther >
Insufficient for combat in that BR where the Kiraly and other submachine guns are better options.
Battle Pass weapon where there are only 4
We can also mention the Soviet and Allied tanks that are competent in that BR
So, is the rocket tank that Germany doesn’t have also a problem?
Since 2021, the Allies have had a lot of competent weaponry and advantages to deal with Germany when the now-defunct Campaign mode still existed.A Jumbo jet in Normandy when it never actually fought in that operation; German fighters without bombs, unlike the Allies.Then in recent years they have been given a vast arsenal where they have fulfilled a large part of their demands Infantry weapons, AT guns, AT cannons, aircraft, tanks, MGs, etc.Fictional and captured weaponry to cover up that faction’s lack of skill, and then you come along and say something incredibly incoherent simply because you don’t like it.
4 Likes
If you see what i quoted I quoted the infantry not the tank part soo R4M are just too powerfull against infantry
Wtf are you on about? Most people agree it’s one of the best ARs in game and competes in br5 exceptionally well. Last time i checked you can’t put kiraly on assault engineers either.
Rocket tanks are premmy first off. Nothing I’ve mentioned is. Second, any competent player can take out a rocket tank before they have a chance to do anything. They have a huge one hit kill box on the pods themselves, and the tanks have shit armor. Don’t pretend they’re anything special. I’ve only seen half a dozen calliopes in the wild over 3-4 years and a single t99.
The Event Weapon does not count and cannot be equipped to more than 2 soldiers
1 Like
They’ve handed out atleast 4 of them, i have 6, enough for the assault engineers. Why does event stuff not count? The OP is referencing premmy/event/BP stuff? So if you’re going to point the finger at other non TT stuff germany’s must also be looked at. I actually think event/BP stuff holds more value than premmy squads, because one is free while the other is not.
It is a solid tank but i don’t understand all the fuss about it if i’m being honest.
It is really good weapon, but i don’t think it powercreeps as much as 30. cal Thompson does on BR 3. Also, 30. cal Thompson were handed out like crazy, i got zero drops from the silver boxes but i still have like 9 of them, all were acquired thru the event.
It’s not a bad weapon but far from being powercreep on BR 5. At least not when something like Fedorov Avtomat available on the TT and the fact that BR 5 is the BR of SF rifles anyway.
The low damage and shitty sight picture tho. Also if you think about it, it’s just a downgrade of PPS-43 that’s also available on the TT, not as an event weapon.
They are not even that good tho. Only fills up the niche roll that when BR 2 gets uptiered to BR 3 and meets KV-1 or 75mm Sherman. Even then, Stug 3 F is also BR 2 so idk who’d even uses Marder 3s when they don’t even have the proper commander view mode. Because of this, you might as well be blind in Marder.
Must be prone to be used and even then it’s worse than Type 97 ATR or Scoped PTRS(GOAT ATR tbh)
Sure this is true
3 Likes
I don’t care germany has these things. I enjoy using them all. The point was they are most definitely not, not keeping up with the power creep. The game is far more balanced now than ever when taking everything into consideration. I just don’t think it’s fair to say they aren’t keeping up with the power creep is all
None of which are better than a King Tiger.
In terms of air combat it goes Meteor - 262 - F-80 - Kikka.
In terms of ground attack it goes F-80, Kikka, 262, Meteor.
So no the 262 is not wildly outclassed by other jets, it’s just a jack of all trades where other jets clearly specialize in certain play styles. Also talking about the aircraft discrepancy and not even mentioning the P-47 is telling.
“Their assault rifles are better” No, and select fire meta so who cares. The Stinger is better than the MG-42-100 but how many Stingers are being thrown around vs the amount of MG-42-100s. Nonetheless an MG-42 universal buff is welcome.
Both of which are already in the game
Also already in the game
The Brummbar wouldn’t be BR5, the Jagdtiger wouldn’t change anything, and for someone who’s been bitching for an essay’s worth of words about how the Tiger II is the only advantage Germany has buffing it seems like an odd choice.
This needs a correction, F-80 is better than 262 on air combat. Don’t believe me then start a turn fight 262 as F-80 with flaps deployed.
3 Likes