This is because you are showing that it’s fired on prone. Look at around the 5:06 where he is firing T24 while on standing and look how badly the rear iron sight wobbles and blocks your vision.
It doesn’t but in reality it is. It feels much worse than MG-42 when you actually fire it. Maybe the rear sight wobbles so much when firing while standing up postion makes it worse.
So how exactly is T24 dispersion worse if its the same ? Assuming you are still comparing it to MG42 early.
Yeah, they aint the actual stats.
I can tell Memeretta 1918? Has absolute shit sight picture without ever using it.
Doesnt seem to obstruct the vision nearly as badly as say grease gun, is it due to T24 sights being further away from face than in grease, idk but hardly a obstructing sights.
Kinda highlights the flawed comparison between guns that never fight each other.
Yes, iam.
You have hundred ( 100 ) Rounds in magazine.
You press the bumbum button once and you have ninety eight ( 98 ) rounds left.
It doesnt magically double the ammo.
Isnt that the case with every gun ? Depends only to what you compare it to.
Press prone, and proceed.
Weird that gun that is supposed to be used on prone or bipoded works better than while not using.
You are 100% wrong about this tho. Type 100 fires 2 bullets at the same time while reducing only 1 bullet on the magazine. So this means that the Type 100 effectively having 200 rnds per mag. Go test yourself.
This is incredibly biased and disingenuous take as prone/mounting only LMGs are utter garbage.
theres 2 holes in the target and 2 rounds reduced from magazine.
I guess we have different version of the game, but feel free to try it out yourself.
Nothing stops you from using it while walking or standing but obviously the downsides are there for a reason.
You have to press the mouse button very briefly otherwise it just fires 2 shots(4 bullets)due to sheer RoF. I will upload the clip myself if you don’t believe me i guess.
For what reason exactly? While other BR 5 LMGs doesn’t have this problem?
Thanks captain obvious.
Still, 2 holes in the target and 2 removed from magazine.
Managed somehow to even get a single shot which meant one (1) round removed from magazine.
Apparently the MG42 sights does move from side to side as well.
You mentioned that it “sounds relatively fair,” but if those trade-offs are truly balanced, it makes me wonder why the two weapons are placed in entirely different tiers.
Those actually are the official in-game stats. Please take a look at the data yourself; it is clearly shown in the weapon’s stat card that the recoil values are higher.
As I have mentioned multiple times, the front sight post completely blocks the target, which might be hard to truly realize without actually using the weapon yourself.
By your logic, the PPD-1944 is placed at Tier 3 due to its lower rate of fire despite having a 71-round drum magazine. If fire rate isn’t actually that important, does that mean you would be fine with the drum-mag variant of the PPSh-41 being moved down to Tier 3 as well?
It’s not magic; the weapon actually fires 4 rounds while only consuming 2 from the ammo count. I didn’t believe it at first either, but it really is the case.
No, it isn’t…
If you are too blind to can’t actually see that there’s two tracers there just tell me that you are blind rather than comes up with brain dead excuses and showing your lack of understanding for the game.
Not like T24 does obviously. If you have functioning eyes that is. Altho given your usual ultra biased take and hostility towards whenever people want to buff something that’s not german you probably would ignore this even if you know this is incredibly biased and disingenuous. Not the first time anyway. 
100 rounds.
Which are wrong.
But for some oddity reason the absolute blocking cant be seen in the video ?
Are they bit obstructing ? Sure, are they bad as you describe ? According to video no.
Sure, while at it move KT2 to BR2 as well, it has less ammo than many BR2 tanks.
I must have different version of the game as I see 2 holes in the target and 2 ammo reduced from magazine.
True, thats why you see ppl running around with BR1 guns in BR5.
Not like the guns become better as you progress.
dunno guess we got different version of the game then
Actually I said about 50 posts ago buff it for all I care.
Just curious what kind of strawman arguments you make here.
You are actually denying it to save your face even after looking at my clip that literally showing 2 tracers per 1 bullet spent from the magazine? Claiming that there’s “duhhh only 1 bullet holes theree” after literally shooting the target at the point blank range which literally tells nothing. What a specimen you are. Keep coping till the end.
I cba to look into all your incredibly biased posts sorry.
Which you seems to so in love to do so whenever german equipments involved.
Dunno, seems to me quite alot easier to look at 2 holes than try to zoom in your 2 tracers with “Trust me brah they there”
But what ever rocks your boat.
But still whining ?
Are we speaking of buffing GE equipment here 
Yea keep coping buddy. At the end of the day, everyone can see that you are literally the peak 
here.
I’m pretty sure i’m not as whiny as you are, even looking at this post alone. No?
Exactly. So get your arse elsewhere to someone talking about german equipments, shoo shoo.
are there 2 holes in the target ? Is there 2 rounds missing from magazine ?
Clearly, hence the whining ?
Theres no reason to be butthurt just because you cant use your equipment properly
If you’re going to call official in-game data and literal facts “wrong” just because they don’t fit your narrative, then there’s no point in arguing. Denying the facts won’t change reality. Besides, if a gun firing at 600 RPM and a gun firing at 1,200 RPM are supposed to have the same recoil… am I the only one out here firing a literal cannon?
That’s an issue that only comes up because you haven’t actually used it yourself. When you try to aim at mid-to-long-range targets with this… you literally can’t see a thing.
I only brought this up because you claimed that the rate of fire doesn’t matter that much. Yet, here you are bringing up the King Tiger just to be sarcastic and mock me. Besides, did I ever even argue that the BR should be lowered just because of a low magazine capacity?
This isn’t an issue with the game version. It actually fires two rounds at once, but the spread between the two projectiles is so tight that it’s hard to notice at close range. You can barely tell the difference only when you shoot at a distance. That’s exactly why the in-game stat card shows this weapon’s damage as 26.4.
“Trust me bro my shitty screenshot that i took after i shot the target at pointblank range is literally more believable than the actual clip that shows 2 tracers on the sky per bullet!!11!!!”
I mean you are blind enough to cannot see the 2 tracers on the sky so i wouldn’t exactly trust what you are seeing.
Theres no reason to be butthurt just because you cant use your german equipment properly
While comparing machine guns which arguably are best used from prone or bipoded.
How does the smg fit in the subject of machine gun exactly ?
50 rounds BR4, 100 rounds BR5
Not sure whats the difficulty here
calm down buddy
Calm down for what? i love making fun of absolute clown. 
perhaps you should re-evaluate your career options, you aint exactly that funny clown.
