My source is that I made it up
1 Like
I don’t know how many times this needs to be said, but the T-44 is not a prototype tank. It was in actual production during the war and was assigned to actual Red Army units, it’s just that it was never deployed into combat (except for allegedly some combat trials against the Germans and maybe limited deployment into Manchuria against the Japanese) due to logistical concerns. While yes the T-44 was produced in relatively low numbers during WW2, this was because they didn’t wait to retool any of the T-34 factories to built the tank and so instead assigned it to the bombed out remains of the Malyshev Factory (perhaps if the T-44’s production wasn’t hobbled by such dire conditions they might have been able to build enough for the Red Army to consider it worth deploying into combat). Now you can argue that service without combat experience is not enough to justify adding into the game, but don’t act like the T-44 is at the same level as something like the Maus or the E-75.
Are you really pulling out the “Soviet human meat wave attack” myth in big 25?
That’s because they don’t work in the gameplay ecosystem of Enlisted.
That’s the point.
It was never used in WW2 just like these:
Real vehicles? Yes.
Do they have a place in a WW2 game that is not Wolfenstein? No.
Allegedly and maybe according to what source or data?
There’s basically no debate T-44 never saw a single second of frontline combat in WW2.
I feel like you missed the point of my message.
And I feel like you missed the point that “alleged” combat trials against the Germans or deployment into Manchuria means there is some data/evidence that it might have seen combat.
What is this “alleged” based upon?
It was just in reference to claims that it was used there. I used the word “alleged” in reference to the fact that claims are of questionable reliability. Had I considered the claims to be likely true I would had worded it differently.
it doesn’t matter… you don’t get to make the argument that it never saw combat so shouldn’t be added yet simultaneously another thing that didn’t see combat is ok because it’s not top BR
Hell, this thinking is pretty r to use in high br where 75% of stuff are prototypes anyway.
Which claims though?
Even allegations need to have at least some basis.
You straight up quoted the claims, I don’t know what you’re getting confused about.
So your “alleged” comes from random forum users claiming stuff? Ok got it.
Yea mate I have no idea what you’re going on about. I heard people claim that the T-44 saw combat in X, I mention it in my post with the inclusion of a caveat that they’re not really backed up, and then you go on this whole spiel.
1 Like
I told you if you want realism you can join there is a war going on for the rest of us that dont want full realism we can add all vehicles that make sense to be added. Enlisted is not a full historic game it has all type of world war 2 equipment and no longer has theaters of war like in the past that kept the balance and equipment to be historically correct now this is impossible in the new system. Literally BR V is fantasy BR has nothing to do with reality.
But even in the old system you had prototypes so yeah in Enlisted system of BRs there is no way the game can be made with 100% historic accuracy. Other games can provide that with specialist equipment being limited to specialists this means not every second guy running with STG and AK 47 in Moscow.
No one told you that T-44 was used in combat I told you it was produced and tested during WW 2 maybe it was used in Manchuria but how this matters there is plenty of weapons and vehicles that where never used and are in the game really.
If you want realism you must set a better system like Post Scriptum or Hell Let Loose that have more complicated class system.
Good job buddy, now give a solid reason why it shouldn’t be added into the game
He has none since by his logic Germany should have King Tigers and USSR and US should have T-34 and Shermans in a 2 vs 2 battles vs King Tigers sounds balanced. 
I suggest giving proper balance:
There is 54,000 T-34s produced during WW 2 and only 492 king tigers so for every king Tiger the soviets will be able to spawn 110 T-34s 
So it’s okay if this is added, right?
This is also good considering that the other things didn’t see a fight either.
Depending can they add similar equipment to the other factions. As you can see the jets broke the game imagine what will happen if they add even better Jets xD Well since you want balance this was also used:
No prototype it was used so lets have it. Good luck with your little toys.
The Jets were a game-changer when they were introduced to Factions that didn’t use them in combat; Germany must have been the only Faction with jets.
Then Allies must be the only faction with Nukes ohh wait its exactly like in the real world since Germany has zero to this day.
2 Likes
Well, I don’t think the Allied players will enjoy dropping a nuke that ends the game instantly. You have to think about it because the bomb doesn’t just cause damage to the Germans, unlike a…The V-2 rocket will cause damage, but not to the degree of a nuclear bomb.
Well Im an ally player I will enjoy nuking making 1000 kills its in war thunder even. So I think will be satisfying getting my screen full of kills xD Then I get a victory screen exactly historic accuracy 100%
1 Like