Absolutely not this is something comparable to IS 3. T44 is a Panther for USSR basically. If you want direct comparison its Panther II.
The E-75 is comparable to the T44. The prototype tank that did not see combat in WWII is comparable to a paper tank that did not see combat in WWII.
Use some brain activity when you want a new vehicle think how it compares gameplay wise did it see combat or it didnt doesn’t really matter as long as its created during the war its fine you literally have full paper tanks never made T-44 was made during the war even beyond a prototype Germany has prototypes even in BR II… that never saw combat and it was produced even less then T-44… and lets not start with US and Japan.
1 Like
Then E-75 must come if they include the T44 100 using the logic of more vehicles
Why will we need E-75 before Jagdtiger ?? Jagdtiger need to come fist.
The T-44 saw combat in Manchuria and was produced more than the Tiger II during the war.
On top of that the E-75 isn’t in War Thunder so if you want it then you better start coding.
3 Likes
I know thats why there is absolutely no chance adding it over a war thunder vehicle.
Jagdtiger should come, but it’s a tank destroyer.Obviously, not many people will use it over a Tiger 2H.It’s not directly comparable, so the E-75, being a tank with better qualities than the Tiger 2H, is a good and comparable option.
Because if they include both in the next update, I assure you that you’ll see more T44s than Jagdtigers, and obviously, players aren’t going to trade a tank that’s balanced in power, mobility, and… Armored tank destroyer with more firepower, lower rate of fire, mobility, and no turret
If they modeled weapons, they should also be able to do so with an E-75, which is very similar to a Tiger 2H.
The devs are not going to add a vehicle thats not in war thunder unless its very very unique vehicle and its desperately needed and even then probably will never happen since so far they never added vehicle outside of war thunder. Since there is a lot of nice ground attackers for Japan but none has been added that is not in warthunder.
1 Like
Well, speaking of Japan, they’re missing a lot of planes for their TT that I want to use
Japan is dead faction by the time they add the desperately needed ground attackers and lower BR planes the faction will be dead hope they move Ki-61- II Otsu Kai to BR III so at least we have one working BR for Japan.
Can we move Ki-61 II Otsu Kai 
BR III and J2M3 to BR IV - Suggestions - Archive - Enlisted
Because T-44 wasn’t used in WW2.
Same as a dozen other things developed/produced during WW2 but including them would be Alt-History:
Really again no logic the game is full of prototypes that are not used in combat T44 is not even a prototype it was used in combat and we know how it operated its far more realistic then all the vehicles that you posted. USSR had number of T44s build during the war. In the TT you have much much worse paper vehicles. T-44 is a real world war 2 tank.
By your logic we should not add also M26 Pershing…the T-44 was not send in combat since it was not needed but its exactly cold war tank like the M26 Pershing.
The T-44 was issued to three tank brigades mustered on 15 September 1944 for training purposes, but these formations (6th Guards, 33rd Guards, and 63rd Guards Tank Brigades
So really I dont see how the Super Pershing is more realistic then T-44 …
WTF this game is Alt-history game Germany and Japan cant win the war they lost…if we make it realistic lets give realistic number of vehicles in the battles and realistic number of resource’s
Would love to see any kind of source on this other than “trust me bro”
In WW2?
Where?
They have only modeled 2 tanks which are the flamethrower ones. Even apcs are just warthunder AA trucks with guns removed. Not to mention that e-75 is simply too overpowered and nowhere near comparable to t44 in terms of power. T-44 100 is the perfect tiger 2h counter while normal t44 panther counter. E-75 would be closer to is-3. Balancing real weapons with prototypes has always been a thing and they won’t just suddenly add some unkillable beast for germans simply because soviets got a much weaker prototype.
Have you opened it :
Tank Archives: Intermediate Tank
it was produced during the war and it was not in a prototype stage…
T-44 was issued to three tank brigades mustered on 15 September 1944 for training purposes these formations 6th Guards, 33rd Guards, and 63rd Guards Tank Brigades
Not to mention it was also tested and fired upon with German 8.8 cm Pak 43
Tank Archives: T-44 Under Fire
The tank was not a prototype at this point simply there was no need of it since Germany surrendered. USSR did not need to use all its porotypes like Germany did since Germany was a nation that half its tanks and planes and weapons where on prototype stage they had no standardization like USSR or US thats why they had poor logistics all the time since they used too many type of vehicles that lacked standardization of its equipment and many limited productions they rushed everything just like the Panther tank in the Battle of Kursk the soviets didnt need to rush and experience the same disaster like the Germans. The Soviets realized that the logistical problem that the new tank will make and didnt rush it.
The tank was in full production in the factories at the end of the war.
Are we still trying to pull the historical accuracy card in the Big 25?
What you wanna strive for is historical authenticity, because historically accurate wouldn’t be fun
1 Like
My question is simple – source please.
Which battle? According to what data?