T-44 for BR5

Jagdtiger should come, but it’s a tank destroyer.Obviously, not many people will use it over a Tiger 2H.It’s not directly comparable, so the E-75, being a tank with better qualities than the Tiger 2H, is a good and comparable option.

Because if they include both in the next update, I assure you that you’ll see more T44s than Jagdtigers, and obviously, players aren’t going to trade a tank that’s balanced in power, mobility, and… Armored tank destroyer with more firepower, lower rate of fire, mobility, and no turret

@Veekay45 Look at this statement

If they modeled weapons, they should also be able to do so with an E-75, which is very similar to a Tiger 2H.

The devs are not going to add a vehicle thats not in war thunder unless its very very unique vehicle and its desperately needed and even then probably will never happen since so far they never added vehicle outside of war thunder. Since there is a lot of nice ground attackers for Japan but none has been added that is not in warthunder.

1 Like

Well, speaking of Japan, they’re missing a lot of planes for their TT that I want to use

Japan is dead faction by the time they add the desperately needed ground attackers and lower BR planes the faction will be dead hope they move Ki-61- II Otsu Kai to BR III so at least we have one working BR for Japan.

Can we move Ki-61 II Otsu Kai :fast_forward: BR III and J2M3 to BR IV - Suggestions - Archive - Enlisted

Because T-44 wasn’t used in WW2.

Same as a dozen other things developed/produced during WW2 but including them would be Alt-History:

image

image

Really again no logic the game is full of prototypes that are not used in combat T44 is not even a prototype it was used in combat and we know how it operated its far more realistic then all the vehicles that you posted. USSR had number of T44s build during the war. In the TT you have much much worse paper vehicles. T-44 is a real world war 2 tank.

By your logic we should not add also M26 Pershing…the T-44 was not send in combat since it was not needed but its exactly cold war tank like the M26 Pershing.

The T-44 was issued to three tank brigades mustered on 15 September 1944 for training purposes, but these formations (6th Guards, 33rd Guards, and 63rd Guards Tank Brigades

So really I dont see how the Super Pershing is more realistic then T-44 …

WTF this game is Alt-history game Germany and Japan cant win the war they lost…if we make it realistic lets give realistic number of vehicles in the battles and realistic number of resource’s

Would love to see any kind of source on this other than “trust me bro”

In WW2?
Where?

They have only modeled 2 tanks which are the flamethrower ones. Even apcs are just warthunder AA trucks with guns removed. Not to mention that e-75 is simply too overpowered and nowhere near comparable to t44 in terms of power. T-44 100 is the perfect tiger 2h counter while normal t44 panther counter. E-75 would be closer to is-3. Balancing real weapons with prototypes has always been a thing and they won’t just suddenly add some unkillable beast for germans simply because soviets got a much weaker prototype.

Have you opened it :

Tank Archives: Intermediate Tank

it was produced during the war and it was not in a prototype stage…

T-44 was issued to three tank brigades mustered on 15 September 1944 for training purposes these formations 6th Guards, 33rd Guards, and 63rd Guards Tank Brigades

Not to mention it was also tested and fired upon with German 8.8 cm Pak 43

Tank Archives: T-44 Under Fire

The tank was not a prototype at this point simply there was no need of it since Germany surrendered. USSR did not need to use all its porotypes like Germany did since Germany was a nation that half its tanks and planes and weapons where on prototype stage they had no standardization like USSR or US thats why they had poor logistics all the time since they used too many type of vehicles that lacked standardization of its equipment and many limited productions they rushed everything just like the Panther tank in the Battle of Kursk the soviets didnt need to rush and experience the same disaster like the Germans. The Soviets realized that the logistical problem that the new tank will make and didnt rush it.

The tank was in full production in the factories at the end of the war.

Are we still trying to pull the historical accuracy card in the Big 25?

What you wanna strive for is historical authenticity, because historically accurate wouldn’t be fun

1 Like

My question is simple – source please.

Which battle? According to what data?

Quite sure no one is capable to win the “war” on the current game.
Just some battles.

Not really, back in days of campaigns the somewhat “requirement” was if it was used it can be added.
Obviously, the goal post since has been shifted quite numerous times.

Dunno, one could argue the GE tank supremacy is “ass-ymmetrical” balance.
Just like murrican planes being un-contested & sovjet infantry weapons.

Well we all know the battle results and the resources used in this battles Germany had very few King Tigers in the Battle of Berlin. If we put full realism battle of Berlin wont be fun for the Germans. Neither they had equal air force to the soviets neither tank force. Giving the nations the same amount of tanks and giving Germany endless amount of King Tigers vs IS-2 is not really realistic.

I doubt there was too many ak-47’s, rd44s, avt’s nor fedorovs either.

Wont really be fun for anyone.

Dunno, against murrica regardless of the 2v2 setup, the murrican planes are by far better compared to GE.

Nor the soviets prototype / absolute garbage guns being top tier in the game.
So lets not pretend it would be somekind of joy ride for soviets either.

T44 100 would still be worse than king tiger H. The turret can be penned by Br 3 panzer 4 while King tiger is pretty much invulnerable to everything except br 5 tanks and couple br 4 ones. King tiger also has better gun depression and faster reload giving germans still a edge in tank gameplay.

I dont really mind if we’re going for red vs blue balance, but these should be implemented in larger scale regarding all equipment.
Since past years the edge of what ever equipment has been shifted quite heavily towards US / USSR.

1 Like

I agree. Along with t44 100 germans will need some buffs. Fg 42 needs bayonet, fockewulf needs fixed flight model and meteor needs to be nerfed at least.

Well exactly this tank is far more realistic then them :

ИСПЫТАНИЯ ОБСТРЕЛОМ БРОНЕКОРПУСА И БАШНИ ОПЫТНОГО ТАНКА Т-44

As you can see it was not some paper prototype. It was in full production during the war simply There was no need to complicate the logistics with it and train new units rushing new vehicle is never a good thing and the Soviets had time while Germany didnt they needed to rush all they had to the frontline.

Well it will be fun for the Allies for sure since USSR and US had very big resources compared to Germany or Japan.

Depends on the BR and I dont think they are better they simply have better payload. There is few very broken planes but they are not in the TT all Murica has in the TT simply has amazing payloads but if you remove it the planes are not that impressive.