Dunno, Soviets have TT Panzerfäuste (long before Allies and Japan got Ofenrohr), Land-Lease planes and Bazooka and every second new event stuff is Land-Lease gear as well, not to mention that they got the Valentine, Lewis and M3A1 APC before the Allies, who still dont have them (who made the stuff) and got 76mm Sherrman and M3 Lee before the Allies in their respective campaigns.
So not sure how this is not weird at all. But I forgot, Soviets dont have BR2 Premium Assaulters.
That’s the most logical choice given that tech tree apcs will likely come in the future, germany has a Sdkfz 250 which is as tiny as UC and probably better, soviets used UC massively and idc about Japan
It doesnt make it right to nerf the svt, i hope m3 comes to allies tech tree at some point
it makes sense for soviets to have panzerfausts because of how massively those were captured, lend lease vehicles are all mid all around so idk
It also doesnt make sense to come up with straw men that do not make sense when you take a look at the TT.
So give Germans SVT, PPSh (no the Balkan-War mod that no one uses), PPD, AVS, PTRD/S and whatnot because they were massively captured by them.
comes up with a straw man himself
Which is?
It shows you don’t have it.
It’s high profile. It’s slooooow. It cannot climb 5⁰ hills…
I mean, 3,75m and around 6m of length alone is about the same, right?
sdkfz 250 isn’t in game is it?
it’s 4.5m of lenght or just a meter longer than UC

wrong sdkfz bru

And all in-game APC-Sdkfzs are 251 models and not 250s.
perhaps i worded it incorrectly, germany has 250 as an option to be added in game as a UC analogue in future, soviets don’t really have any similar apcs and japan has some that should be in TT
This Sonderkraftfahrzeug 250 or another one? Because this isn’t a Universal Carrier analogue, and the soviets just got their own UC in the event, just like the allies have.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sd.Kfz._250
the main gripe with UC is that it’s tiny, sdkfz 250 is similarly sized and could come in the future, they dont really need a UC
You just said it would be a UC analogue. And now that’s not the case?
““Analogue” can refer to something similar or comparable to something else”
it’s not an apc it’s an artillery tug, as you can see by it’s lack of [A]rmour protection for the [P]ersonnel

