In the beginning I was kinda indifferent towards this whole thing, it just seemed like a fair, plausible suggestion. But man oh man I hope they look at the votes and consider this change even more now, after seeing you malding and thrashing on the forum like this.
devs aren’t idiots, obviously they can see that there are 90% of votes YES to move mkb42 to br4 in a neighbouring thread and make the right conclusions about people like you who vote there, thanks for admitting that you voted because you seethe over your inability to provide any arguments
You are comparing br 3 weapons with br 4 ones which are cleary superior -_-
3 Likes
I agree that devs aren’t idiots so I wonder which side they’re more likely to listen to… Ones who are asking for reasonable balance change like in this case or ones who are uncivil in their forums, thrashing and lashing out at others like madmen? You could’ve just presented your arguments calmly btw, the way you’re handling this whole thing just ends up making them all moot.
2 Likes
Welp im not a fan of moving assault rifles to br 4 rather than saying that the mkb42 does not have reason to exist on br 5 since mp43 and the stg are cleary superior also why You are complaining You fucking have weapons with insane mag and insane fire rate? And since the maps on br 4-5 are CQB You have a bigger adventage
But well Br4 doesnt exist at all bruh so whats the point? Of moving it to br 4? After all it Will face br 5 only
creates a thread with thrashing and lashing against soviets
Such as?
1 Like
i play br4 germany rn tho
All im doing is asking for a single argument on why should it reload with clips other than “other guns do this” and then meeting a rant over “soviets being the most pampered nation”
delusional germany players are so deluded
And let me guess 90% of time getting an uptier?
Is called balance and i alredy have mentioned to You on previous wall texts the reason why is unfair to have such short reload time while the other guy have to reload it’s rifle life of it was a fucking Heavy mg
2 Likes
does it even matter if 80% of soviet players use br3 shit on br5?
mg42/mp43 feed vs mosin sniper, dp27, sectoral ppsh
Welp thats their fault for being stupid and don’t having any propper equipment for br 5
2 Likes
6 Likes
The creator of this topic went ahead and asked a pretty civil question and let people vote on it. And people who cared enough to elaborate have you their reasons, the main concern and reason for the change seems to be balance between br3 semi-autos. Now if their reasons aren’t good enough for you or if you aren’t able to accept them that’s your thing, but that doesn’t make their points invalid and doesn’t open up the people making them for insults.
8 Likes
And then it’s the same case whenever i play br 5 with soviets my enemies have br 3 weapons and rarely a propper equipment
Oh Yea but they got a fucking good team thats something i can’t deny
1 Like
their reasons: i play germany, german auto rifles reload slower so should soviet ones for balans
ha ha ha, great reasoning
And your reason against it is…? People here are arguing in favor of balance, that is good reasoning in my eyes.
2 Likes
unfortunately, the KT2 doesnt warm up much.
BR3 -/-4 .
But while doing such you conveniently forgot KV’s in BR2 lobbys.
Almost said since when soviets have had tommy, but thank god I remembered ofc soviets must have tommy.
Dunno, doubt anyone asked for that.
But jeez thanks for AR that is -/- mkb35 at BR2 which is also pretty shit.
Definitely better option than RM50 oh wait.
4 Likes