It’s called trowing everyone on dust
If all the other nations take 2 days to reload their br 3 guns via clips why soviets shouldnt suffer aswell?
And before You start saying more nonsense i gotta remind You that all the other rifles would be on the same spot and none would have any adventage
And talking about trowing everyone on the dust i’m wondering how a gamemode with more realistic recoil and slower realod for all guns would look like 
Yeah thats fucking amazing, I would love that, its those sorts of things that make the game shine, I for one still think one of the best features for Enlisted is the limited view you have inside a tank, and how you have to risk your commander sometimes to get a better view.
As was the UC, it offers very little to no meaningful protection to the dismounts inside, the only people sufficiently covered are the driver and hull gunner.
Hence why past the early war and in select circumstances, the UC wasnt used as an APC in the traditional sense, mostly being used as an artillery tractor and utility vehicle.
As for the T-20, it was used in basically the exact same way as the UC, and it would operate very similarly in game as well.
nah, t20 was used only for towing guns, UC was actually used to transport personnel in battle, directly fighting
it pains to see mains who cannot objectively think critically.
" you attacked my group, i now attack your group. and when enough evidence is provided, i shall move the goal-post ".
ape type mentality 
Bold statement.
Did you know, theoreticly speaking, that’s true for the Sd.Kfz. 7 as well.
Only difference is, this thing is both armed and armoured, whilst the Sd.Kfz. 7 isn’t.
So, what’s the problem…?
Oh, and that the UC isn’t and never was an APC, that was never its intended role, nor is it even capable of being one. It was a armoured utility vehicle, ferrying ammunition, gear, messages, artillery pieces, select very important people or wounded in and out of hotly contested zones. It was amazing, at this very specific thing, yes, but it’s not an never was and APC.
You’re not squeezing a section of mounted infantry in the back of a UC, the few that could fit in were either not protected (carrying four passengers), or only carrying two taking cover (and it’s going to be one hell of a bumpy ride with no dedicated seating in the back). There’s not even a way for them to dismount that wouldn’t leave the troops vulnerable to small arms fire (in the Sd.Kfz. 251 there’s a door in the back for example, standard for almost all APCs).
Face it, if the T20 isn’t an “APC” in your mind, which at least has dedicated seating for 6 passengers, then the UC isn’t either.
There are only like four vehicles fullfilling the term anyways (M3, Japanese, LAV and 251) while the second German 251 being a SPG.
Others are just half-tracks, light tankettes or straight ordinary trucks.
The is certainly accounts of T-20’s being used in the APC role, but its far more the concept of, “Heres a vehicle with an armoured compartment/engine and is tracked, meaning it will be able to push onto its objective despite small arms fire while acting as a support unit for infantry it would carry to the point of contact”.
Its worth mentioning that no APC in WW2 was used as we think of APC’s now, all would carry their dismounts to the point of contact with some very rare exceptions, the only exceptions coming to mind here is carrying sappers to a bunker/etc to plant charges.
That is true, two wrongs doesnt make a right tho
t20 has 6 places for the gun battery crew
to my knowledge they were usually issued with 1-2 spare mags, and a bunch of stripper clips, just like the G43
i give up on you not seeing how moving a br4 tech tree weapons to br3 is unfair to a faction that lacks them. thank you no truly a bat shit crazy person like you makes me feel sane.
not seeing the difference between the g43/svt38/svt40/ vs garand.
is like not seeing the difference between the g43/svt38/svt40/ vs type 4/Johnson/g41
---------------------g41------------------garand
reload 2 seconds 3 seconds
magazine 8 bullets 10 bullets
please talk more i would love to take more hits of youre copium
The Germans want to win in all BR LOL, then please add a LMG for USSR that Equivalent to MG34
Why not buff the G41? Gaijin players just want to make everyone unhappy
I agree.
stg - ak47
mkb - fedorov
quite hard to imagine any GE weapons that soviets didnt get a prototype counter or something else.
Agreed
Ah yes, except mgs, sdkfz 251/9, solothurn, ofenrohr, fg42, KT, etc
Well, got to agree that is true. Every BR where LMG is bit of lack luster GE just better ones.
So both has trash LMG’s but GE just has little bit less trash LMG.
At BR5 soviets got the RD44 which is best TT lmg.
And to even up this absolutely disastrous LMG “benefit” ge has soviets got in exchange better smg’s thru all BR’s.
Tough life.
I assume this is somekind of event apc, probably at BR5 because too OP or something.
Ah the unique solothurn, which unique part is that in can only be used in prone or bipod unlike any other AT rifle.
And ofc again, loaning the arguably best BR2 AT weapon, bazooka which is TT.
Must be tough to only have RMN50 in comparison regarding event rewards.
dont worry, you will get it too just like every each pzfaust.
AVT that is better.
Well thats about the only thing GE has better and ofc the earlier mentioneded LMG’s of BR 1-4.
Other than those soviets got either better or same equipment.
You truely are suffering.
solothurn
yep a semi auto
with the best pen in the game
has twice the ammo of ani semi auto at rifle
or is a 10 round semi auto against 10 round bolt action rifle
yep removing
the prone requirement would be as fair as moving the garand to br2
and if you bring up the type 97
yes i recall the great Japan on Germany battles
the forces of the emperor vs the furher