Standarize the Jets turn rate and give a reason to use propper planes

As the topic says the Jets turn rages are stupid
Take for example the Me 262

Is supposed to have 28 secs of turn rate and what we have on the Game? Oh Yea 16-17 secs only which is not only stupid but also kills the reasons on why we should use propper planes instead of Jets spam

The second reason i want to all Jets to have same turn rate is to give them a more Accurate playstyle (boom and zoom)

And finally is for balance reasons maybe 16 seconds sounds to few but lets take a look to meteor which have 13 seconds of turn rate making it the Best jet on the Game and it’s payload is not behind aswell since it has 2 bombs instead of 1 (glad that 500lbs and not 1000lbs since these we’re Even worse)

So i suggest standarizing the Jets turn rate to the same number for all Jets

But first i’m doing some questions

Do You agree that both propper planes and Jets must have a reason to be used on high brs?

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Which must be the turn rate that Jets should have if is standarized to same number

  • No changes (explain why)
  • 16-18 seconds
  • 19-20 seconds
  • More than 20 seconds
0 voters

Ah yes before i forget about it pls increase the number of ammo on kikka since 100 bullets is to few i suggest around 200-250

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
1 Like

From what I know, the Kikka only had 50 rounds in each cannon And during Kikka few tests, it didn’t even have all the ammo lol.

The R2Y2 V1 would be an option, but without the bomb

Americans can easily take 200 rounds from nowhere (when is supposed that are only 100) and use them on their stingers so why Japan can’t?

Because we don’t need more fiction

Sir we are getting a prototype tank and a weird weapon for Japan next update isnt that fiction?

1 Like

Well there is Yokosuka MXY-7 interceptor that even saw combat but the devs dont wanna do new models:

SENSHA: Ohka-based Interceptor Fighter

So it can be interesting suicidal interceptor xD

We can get also the other option:

Chi-To Late did exist, so it’s not fiction. The Type 2 6.5mm also existed, but the model and magazine are wrong because the devs were lazy.

I’ve been waiting for this a long time, I hope it comes to the game someday.

1 Like

I think the best thing they could do would be to give the Meteor 100% fuel capacity to nerf its performance, the other jets are fine tbh. The main reason why they feel so good compared to everything else is that they’re basically BR6 equipment stuck in BR5 because of compression.

They’ve added props like the Tu-2s and Ki-83 that are able to perform better than their faction’s respective jets, but there are still plenty of BR6 props they could add that don’t require nerfing jets. I’ve said this before but the only truly problematic jet is the Meteor, every other one can be outturned easily by a prop.

1 Like

Thats not true at all all jets are broken they have insane speed and payload capacity the worst Jet is the Kikka and its also OP 800 kg bomb and insane stats the only bad thing is the limited ammo the Soviet and the German jets are also super strong the US and UK are the best since they have best payloads. But there is not a single one of them that is not better then the props so they all deserve their nerf. Since they added them to the game BR V is absolutely bad even in the past the rocket spam was better then now.

The Ki-83 is not a good plane at all Tu-2s is slow like very slow the Soviet Jet is better same way the Kikka is better then Ki-83.

The Ki-83 is full of bad disadvantages :

Too Big
Made of glass
cannons are at the bottom
overheats
small bombs
weak flaps

Overall its not very good plane its boom and zoom plane.

I think that the Ki-83 is the best prop fighter in the game, so the fact that it’s an attack aircraft is a good thing. Its bombload is small, but still enough to destroy tanks and APCs if you know how to bomb. But yeah the Kikka+Ki-83 combo is really strong all things considered.

As for the Tu-2s, the speed has never been a problem for me. In fact its capability to shoot down planes is so good that I don’t even use a fighter plane at BR5 for the Soviets, the Tu-2s is that good. Also it’s tied for the best bombload in the game and it’s really not hard to bomb with it.

Making them all the same? Sorry not in favour personally

1 Like

Ki 83 is bad prop there is many better props then Ki-83 a good Spitfire or Tempest will ruin your day very easily. And wait till you face the La-7 xD All the Japanese BR V planes are better then Ki-83 except the J2M3.

1 Like

Gets me how undervalued this beast is

Well if it had big bombs would be good BR V plane but with that miserable payload simply cant be BR V but I cant wait for La-7B-20 xD Imagine this thing xD It has the 3 noose cannons the only good thing about I-185 but on La … xD

Well it was fine before jets. Not like anyone else had a great fighter payload either lol

But yeah. Br 4 now

1 Like

Yeah before this the payloads where normal simply after they added the Jets I mean Meteor and the US Jet have 10 times the bombs of the La and they are on the same BR xD

1 Like

Well if I find the good Spitfire or Tempest then I’ll let you know. But until then I’ll just keep shooting down Meteors and P-47s.

Well the Meteors must be very bad since they have much better turn and speed and climb not to mention they can just come on top of you where your plane has a blind spot since all the guns are on the bottom. The P-47s very few people can play good this plane really its very easy plane to learn and they never learn how to play. Also planes with good roll rates can also ruin your day since they can spray you and roll out.

You must be a really bad pilot if you’re letting yourself get bested in a Ki-83