WTF are you talking about LMAO, please learn how to read, what I was talking about was player balance in game and any minor rebalancing is really not that hard at all, simply testing different adjustments of numbers LMAO.
1 Like
what was said and what I get to see in game is totally different unless your brain fuctions differently mate I simply asked few questions with yes or no answers but you all just going around the point with no concrete answers and if your minor adjustment ever comes to the game I shall change my view point
Just use internet archive to search for data that is no longer available. I can’t find any mentions of “100 players per battle”. If you could do that, I’m sure it would convince everyone. I don’t think it matters thought. Trying to catch them on a “lie” from years ago won’t do anything for the game we have here and now.
If people want more players per battle, I think they should just ask for more players per battle. Invoking old promises will do nothing. Even if they did promise something only to go back on that promise, there must have been a reason for that. A reason that won’t go away from people accusing them of something.
Changing ammount of players to asymmetrical would require rebalancing the guns so that the side with less players gets more powerful guns to compensate for that.
But apperantly you are incapable of simple logic 
yes totally ok to say 100 soldiers battles…includes 98 bots and 2 human player
it wouldn’t be a lie then, no.
But bots are bots
no it is just some mInOr aDjUsTmEnT
1 Like
What LMAO?
It says specifically the player count is uncertain there LMAO!
Also, now you are simply exaggerating, the game has ten ish players a side with a max of 7 bots per player LMAO.
Totally not resulting in a drastically diffrent player experience iF yOu JuSt ChAnGe TwO nUmBeRs. (team one max count, team 2 max count)
oh yeah I have seen these random dudes in discords where they suggests like never ever I think they typed a code lol
Which clearly refers to total player count per battle, and not per side.
Should read Map extension for both sides - #43 by 5762269
Have a few giggles
ok lets close this topic only adding more negativity in the already negative environment
2 Likes
More Player is Better！
Via the Enlisted Press-Kit on the main website:
So all that’s promised is 10v10
Enlisted Press Kit 2020 - Google Drive
The reason I was digging around in the press kit: nice custom steam layout for the game
2 Likes
Didn’t see that steam layout when i looking around in press kit 
Im very said if enlisted proceeds to make equal teams battles.
Asymmetrical team balance is the new generation of ww2 FPS gameplay.
Equal team balance will just make this game forgiving
1 Like
I meant that I made it for my own steam using the artwork and logos in the kit.
1 Like
Stalker devs made a lot of promises in the beginning. Actually we have a lot of stories about false promises. But stalker still a good game, an all time hit.
Enlisted have a strong interesting gameplay now. We have a huge game map - I can imagine more then 10 v 10 playerz in the future. Why we demand everything at CBT? Right now.
Tarkow grows about 4 years. And now it have a lot of mechanics and new maps. BTW I guess I first want to know there is soviet side in BF5 promised by lead developer. It wasn’t. That is a false promise
1 Like
honestly, BF 5 overall is a huge false promise
2 Likes
Wow that looks legit 