@MajorMcDonalds I support your relations. But please complete this last goal - add a new front at least. We all know it is soviet-japanese. This year was 80-year anniversary of it so I was upset it aint given yet. It gives new life to a japanese side and a soviet one. Do us a favor, Major
3 Likes
Cool!
2 Likes
@MajorMcDonalds @Euthymia07-live are DEVs planning to fix the german shotgun “Drilling”? It has 3 barrels and still only 2 are functional
18 Likes
Did active matter fail that bad???
Hot take: if you only have 2 cannons ready out of the 4 required, you don’t release any of them until all 4 are ready.
The Devs should have started working on Japanese and Soviet cannons the moment they decided to divide AT guns by BRs.
8 Likes
It seems like Active Matter didn’t matter that much after all.
17 Likes
The playerbase wasn’t active enough.
15 Likes
To be honest I’m unbothered because it didn’t really MATTER that much to me anyway.
6 Likes
In other World War II games, there are various types of anti-aircraft guns such as 128mm, 88mm, and 50mm rapid-fire anti-aircraft guns. I look forward to seeing some of these as part of the map scene props and as corresponding weapons for BR in Dark Stream.
2 Likes
Regarding your point about assigning specific maps to weapons or teams to prevent some out-of-place issues, I recall that Darkflow seemed to have attempted something similar when merging the tech trees. I remember there was an announcement about categorizing certain weapons to appear on specific maps, like certain tanks only being available on designated maps to adhere to historical accuracy. However, Enlisted is still a fast-paced game and is much more challenging compared to tactical teams. I think the previous campaign mode was better, but the severe player diversion led to the necessity of merging. So, it seems that this idea might only be feasible when there are more players or when Darkflow has a better plan. Eventually, that idea was abandoned due to player complaints that it was too complicated. Now that I think about it, it’s quite similar to what you’re suggesting.
1 Like
At the beginning of this game, everyone complained that the production capacity of “en” should be divided among them. But now, this game seems to be nothing special, ordinary and nobody cares about it. The most distinctive feature of the game - the ability to drive vehicles - has not been realized. Moreover, the market competition is already saturated and it’s time to pick up something reliable now.
No matter how strong the elite squad is, what about the fairness of the game you claim? Earlier you said that a few weapons obtained by banned players affected the so-called ‘fairness’! Strengthening the elite squad won’t affect it anymore? Isn’t that just slapping yourself in the face? If you can’t manage it, get a new planner!
3 Likes
I think you are referring to the one and only Test Server which lasted for only several days, where all gear was categorized by “letters”, where e.g. Tiger 1 had letters B, N, T meaning you would potentially get to play on berlin, Normandy and Tunisia maps with it.
That testing was so short (I was out of town for the week and couldn’t participate), had so few players (because test server) and was so unbalanced (because people with M1903 and Stuart were thrown into the same matches as people with STG and Tiger 2), that the fast conclusion of “history bad” was made.
Now, despite what my opponents often try to claim, I have never and will never advocate for intentionally unbalanced gameplay.
I have come up with a few ideas over the years from gear automatically changing depending on the theater (e.g. your Panther becomes Tiger 1 in Tunisia because Panthers never fought in North Africa) to interchanging squads depending on the theater (e.g. Chinese squad in Burma, Arabs in Tunisia, French resistance in Berlin, etc.), but currently my most refined concept to avoid insane BS is this:
Enlisted 2.0 – Historical and Balanced concept. With UK, Italy and France
6 Likes
I do forget the Flak 41 was a thing, god its so fucking funny.
1 Like
Why the devs thought low BR Berlin was acceptable and won’t allow players to choose their own BR/map links is beyond me.
Like no, I do not want to be fighting 1930s Soviet tanks in Berlin (like T-28)
That’s not why I play Enlisted
I will quit this BS every single time, regardless if I have a booster activated or not
This is called bait and switch.
This is not what I signed up for in 2020-21.
If Enlisted devs had announced their game back then as “T-28 in Berlin haha”, I would have spared lots of money and time over the 5 years.
4 Likes
quit acting like a man child and go try a different game instead of repeatedly abandoning your team, either put up or shut up
2 Likes
Well we can give then Japan KV and Sherman tanks and sure they can have similar aircrafts as long as Japan has similar tanks and ground attackers to the Allies BR III.
The merge killed any historical accuratcy
5 Likes
He doesnt have to. His opionin matters much has anyones. Geting aggressive in forums againts other players is a huge red flag
5 Likes
Merge killed any player choices thats for sure. We all wish we can pick modes and maps but player happyness has never impirtant. For me demolition mide is the worst.