Should Saboteurs be part of the Guerrilla Squad?

Should Saboteurs be part of the Guerrilla Squad?

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Here are key similarities between a guerrilla soldier and a saboteur:

  • Irregular warfare role

    • Both operate outside or alongside conventional armed forces and are associated with irregular, asymmetric, or unconventional warfare rather than set-piece battles between regular armies.
  • Small-unit, covert operations

    • Both typically work in small teams or alone, relying on stealth, surprise, and mobility rather than large formations or heavy equipment.
  • Use of surprise and deception

    • Ambushes, raids, hit-and-run tactics, camouflage, misinformation, and other forms of deception are common tools for both.
  • Focus on specific targets

    • Both aim at high-impact targets (infrastructure, supply lines, command posts, patrols) whose disruption yields strategic or operational gains disproportionate to force size.
  • Mobility and dispersion

    • Both tend to avoid prolonged static engagements; they disperse into civilian areas, countryside, or concealment after an action to evade capture.
  • Dependence on intelligence and local support

    • Effective operations rely on timely intelligence, reconnaissance, and often some level of support or concealment from local populations or sympathetic networks.
  • Psychological and political effects

    • Both seek to erode enemy morale, create uncertainty, and influence political outcomes (undermine authority, force resource diversion, shape public perception).
  • Resource constraints and improvisation

    • Limited access to formal military supplies leads both to improvise weapons, tools, tactics, and logistics.
  • High risk and covert legal/ethical status

    • Operations typically carry high personal risk (capture, execution) and may involve activities that occupy ambiguous legal or moral territory (sabotage, assassinations, attacks from among civilians).
  • Emphasis on training in specialized skills

    • Both require training in demolition, reconnaissance, survival, concealment, and escape-and-evasion techniques.

These similarities reflect overlapping mission sets and methods: guerrilla fighters frequently conduct sabotage, and saboteurs often operate like guerrillas when embedded behind enemy lines. Differences do exist (e.g., guerrillas may engage in broader insurgent activity and sustained campaigns, while saboteurs focus narrowly on destroying or impairing material targets), but the list above captures their principal commonalities.

1 Like

Guerilla seems more to represent Commandos. Why they didn’t just call them Commandos I don’t know but that’s what they’re supposed to represent

Saboteurs represent actual spies like the Brandenburgers, SOE, and OSS

So Guerillas are supposed to be commandos that raid the enemy, while Saboteurs are spies.

I feel they have very different roles

1 Like

As someone who’s actually played the saboteur. They play way different.

It was already explained that it is not possible to add saboteurs in the guerrilla squad:

You correctly noted that the concept of the saboteurs are similar to the guerrillas. This is not a coincidence: the Saboteur class is based on ideas that originally came up when we created the Guerrilla class, but for various reasons did not suit them due to their more aggressive play style, their squad containing AI soldiers and so on.

Closed as answered