Tested AVT-40 20 with horizontal perk on fully upgraded rifleman 3 and that gun is even better than with vertical perk.
Now i wish for APC we could have rifleman and driver could carry a rifle.
Tested AVT-40 20 with horizontal perk on fully upgraded rifleman 3 and that gun is even better than with vertical perk.
Now i wish for APC we could have rifleman and driver could carry a rifle.
@Euthymia07-live Would you mind asking about Applying the 50% Fuel Reduction Jets got to “ALL” aircraft? (really prop aircraft dont need more than 30% fuel)
Jets got this little added bonus rather quickly… (Makes a fair bit of difference…the SU-9 for example is 900kg lighter, 262 is 700kg lighter)
It also might help with some long time bugs
2 Potential fixes for Flight Bugs that have been around for years - Suggestions - Enlisted
You may want to consider going to the Russian forum because at least they’re somewhat trying to do things over there.
There’s been nothing to do for over two weeks. And the event is probably next week. It’s almost a month away… Everything is ready, why don’t you publish it?
is that were the action is?..Ill just keeep trying
You should try posting that question on the Russian side Because at least on that side they’re actually there unlike our ones on this side which are hiding.
Well, I don’t know Russian. And I’m sure they won’t listen to anyone there either. So I won’t bother.
Apparently considering a helper tagged me on the transparency thread on the Russian side while I’ve been pestering this side and haven’t got an actual answer.
I have some translators I can give you or you could ask SG considering he was the one bridging the gap
Translator? No thanks! I have no idea what a Russian post means. So I don’t post something I’m not sure about.
Microsoft Edge solves my problem to some extent and I have translators for text which I just have to put back and forth until it makes sense.
And here is a topic I was talking about that I made to show that the helpers on that side are actually doing something and they shouldn’t have actually done something considering the English side hasn’t even touched that side.
According to some rumors, there should be an event today, but nothing happened. Therefore, I have reason to suspect that the developers did not actually complete their work on time because Active Matter does not interfere with the update work of Enlisted. Therefore, there is only one reason for this. I really believe that developers targeting Enlisted should set up a Key Performance Indicator and disclose it to players, while ensuring that there is no false fabrication
Considering how things are going at this company that’s impossible because if they had it we could probably hold them to account.
While the same CM can’t tell which studio is working on the game and don’t know if Riga DF still exist. I wouldn’t trust his words as he don’t have much contact with Gaijin now outside of the probably one dev of Enlisted and Matter Team.
Well, it’s just an unproven idea of mine. I’ve always thought Enlisted could have done better, and I’ve replied to others like that. But everything today shows that the developers didn’t satisfy the players
I have indeed heard some rumors that Riga DF has disbanded in 2023, with most members transferring to Active Matter for development work, and only a few continuing to lead Enlisted as planners. Similarly, there is an unconfirmed rumor that the Enlisted project will be transferred to a studio located in Hungary at some uncertain time (they developed WT)
Tbh, they’re not gonna go on full with the cosmetics, even if we suggest many to them.
Honestly, I don’t think AM is to be blamed for this. I think the update and this event as well were postponed mainly because of that Chinese attack on Gaijin.
They still haven’t fixed the consequences of that.
I’m really fed up with the flat ui and the more difficult interface to operate
Helpers seem busy elsewhere
Could this be added to the list please?
Planes could do with the Patch up jets got (jobs not finished). Anywhere between 100-800 kgs lighter, plane dependant