What is the difference between a nerf and a buff? Both are changes, aren’t they? ![]()
One makes the gun better and more fun to play the other makes it worse and less fun to play
Also saying it’s br 1 cuz it’s not as good as the most meta smgs in br 2 is hilarious and a line of logic you keep on trying to make work even after all this time
What does MP-18 have to do with me?? YOU HAVE NO ARGUMENT
Ur argument: the mp18 is so bad it doesn’t need changes to go to br 1. U tried brining up the mp 40 as comparison, which has 120 less rof. Ur argument. Ur involvement.
This is just ragebait to get someone angry and a moderator will close this post
You’ve done this with several others.
Sorry you don’t have the emotional intelligence to control yourself.
If you think the MP-40 is worse, that’s a skill problem
Tell me how it’s better than by a full br worth then. Enlighten me
Again, what does MP-18 have to do with me? Stop ignoring all the arguments and changing the subject.
Cuz ur blaming me for you getting angry and the post closing.
A nerf means you reduced something, and a buff means you increased. Both are changes, and this squad has already been changed as it was buffed. Since it has already been changed, then there is nothing sacred about this squad so it’s no big deal if the dev’s decided to nerf or buff it again, they’ve already done it. Nerf, buff or leave as it is, it should be BR1, and always should have been BR1.
Again. Name me a time a premium was nerfed.
This is just ragebait, of course I’m going to get angry. When you have an argument for why the MP-18 should be BR2, send a message.
The mp 18 should be br 2 cuz it has too high of a fire rate for a 30+ round mag to be in br 1, its quite good and solid where its at currently (my favorite premium infantry squad actually) and enlisted doesn’t nerf premiums. See since my stance is what the games stance currently is its your responsibility to hold up ur argument. So why is the mp 40 better to a degree they’re different battle ratings worth of viability difference.
It’s fictional, so if it’s corrected it’s BR1
Several SMGs have 30 rounds or more in BR1, so it wouldn’t be a problem.
Can’t you debate without having to insult people? You called me a MORON, and now this guy lacking emotional intelligence?
How old are you, 12?
See boys and girls, this is how you know you’re losing the debate.
But carry on… ![]()

You missed how I showed the combo of the fire rate and the 30 round mag? And enlisted doesn’t nerf premiums. Show me when they have and it better be after the premium is released.
Sounds like someone couldn’t find a time enlisted nerfed a premium….
If the rate of fire that actually existed is implemented, it will be a BR1 SMG.
It’s not a Nerf, it’s a historical correction