I pay the internal currency in order to receive them. Someone pays gold
and then their value increases ironically.
even if you put it in a separate slot, it’s obviously not going to work with a parachute)
so they’ll make a separate slot and you’ll keep crying anyway.
after all, the root of your phantom problem has not been solved, but only shifted to another after all, the root of your phantom problem has not been solved, but only moved to another place.
Stupidly.
Is it the translator or are you just typing it in strange ways?
You are extremely difficult to understand. Might as well type in your native language so i can use translator on it?
Just because you don’t meet them, it doesn’t mean they are not there. According to https://enlistedrollcall.com/, I checked 90% of your games, and I didn’t see you play BR5 at all. At most, you played BR4. Veterans play BR5 for the most part, and that’s where the body armor can be found, not at newbies. There are also veterans with body armor playing BR3, but there are a huge number of BR3 games happening daily, so fiding the veterans who abuse the body armor is smaller in BR3.
The stats don’t lie. And in the clan scene, where vehicles are not allowed, everyone is running Soviets for 2 reasons. Body armor, and The AVS 36 20, which is just better than everything else out there. Is everyone in the clan scene subjective , or is it that we know what is better ?
Fixable by removing the body armor. You suggested above giving it to everyone. Why spread the mess ? It’s easier to just remove it from the 1 faction that has it .
There is nothing subjective about the stats. From turn rate, to the cannons, it’s not even close.
for example, the Tu-2S is everything the Junker 188 wishes it was.
The TU-2s has :
Cannons
Climbs faster
Turns better.
Did I make my point or do I need to go into every plane ?
Speaking of, they have the yak 9k which can 1 shot TIGER 2H btw.
Right… paratrooper who have to make safe landings with parachutes should not be jumping with heavy equipment that also limits your mobility. Where is the issue?
I will get dissapointed… from getting what I want…? Huh…?
Ah, phantom problem. Of course, there are no concerns about the effects of body armour. Kindly refer back to what Valkay said in the beginning of the topic;
If the problem doesn’t exist, there is no issue in removing it - if the problem exists, it must be removed.
Helpers are gonna forward the post with less than 50 percent positive votes to keep the select fire recoil as it it’s but nothing will happen to this suggestion.
The problem with “I deserve damage reduction because I paid for it” falls apart when you mention that you paid for COSMETICS.
Not body armour as its own gear (like a backpack or gun), not the effect itself, but cosmetics that you will keep even after the unfair damage reduction is removed.
If you bought these only for the advantage than you are nothing more than a exploiter, last time someone took advantage of a major exploit, he and his whole friend group got banned.
If you’ve noticed, I play with friends who are interested in playing 4 against 5
ImpotentsConstantly playing on 5 br, don’t be offended.
I play wherever I want, because I’ve had enough of one or the other br, if you tried to hurt me, you couldn’t)
As I wrote above. In real combat, artillery and tanks help bulletproof vests to zero
You’re taking the perfect ones again.That’s your mistake, all of you. Take the usual mass fights where no one is puzzling over how you all are here
By reducing the damage to avt, the vanshot will not disappear.
It’s easier to play and not think
Than to think and not to play)
only in your wet dreams. As the owner, I haven’t shot tanks for a long time.
The narrow orientation of this aircraft does not make it an super technique, otherwise it’s bad.
if you want to go ahead)
as I said, everything is subjective here.
I have no idea what tanks, aircraft or other vehicles would have to do with body armour. Those are their own balance concerns.
Talking about these really feels like that someone is trying to justify an unfair advantage by listing grievances his favourite little faction has in completely unrelated matters
Is our game just about infantry?
It seems to say that it cuts 10% of all damage, so it’s worth considering all sources of damage, and here’s the bad luck, shooting damage is literally in the minority)
we have a lot of things much more dangerous than your infantry)
I don’t have a favorite faction, I play for anyone who is sent by a random search)
I’m just making fun of your relatively small numbers and limited thinking.
I often prefer to play with equipment in support, and I don’t really care about cuirasses, and this is literally true, cuirasses won’t save you from a HE)
also, when playing infantry for the USSR, I often die from explosions and rarely from shootings)
and when it comes to a shootout, a burst of lead flies at me, not one phantom bullet, as you consider and reason here)
and now the USSR has a better custom than boring cuirasses, they remained in very small numbers. when I was just pumping up the USSR, and in principle it was stylish at that time, now everything has changed)
Thank you for admitting that the problem exists now all of the sudden.
It feels extraordinarily unfair arguing against you… your translator isn’t doing you any favours, and you don’t even hold a position for longer than five minutes.
Why are you here then, arguing against removing the bonuses…?
Wont ever happen with him, i wouldnt be surprised if he just talks this much to derail the convo because its literally just a back and forth with him not making any good points.
There’s nothing to even discuss here, but I’ve already spent an hour on you in particular)
Give 5% protection from bullets and 30% from all explosions adding to all fractions and the problem is solved, on both sides of the issue A direct hit will still kill, but a splash will work a little worse.
