Ttk alone means nothing other than “potential” without any other circumstances. You already agreed with me that tommy gun is quite nerfed in comparison so not sure why you’re trying to back track here karen.
It’s only recently become somewhat of a fair fight between u.s. and germany after a year or so of neglect, and germany players bitched and moaned the entire time u.s. finally got some attention. Germany was the “golden child”, “the favorite” for years on end, it’s gone to your rotted brains and now y’all act like children throwing temper tantrums when they don’t get their way.
I never complain about RD44 being the best weapon in the game, simply because its limited to MG gunners, a full squad of AVT40 has more effective potential firepower - but RD44 as a weapon compared to other weapons on its own is the best.
In fact I complain much more often that Stinger should get a capacity nerf, because it has visually a 100 round belt box, that incorrectly fits 200 round.
Alot of people complain about Stinger being OP, I am not one of them, again because I consider MG gunners a gimmick - they are just a support unit, with a niche gameplay application, movement dispersion breaks those guns in regular run and gun gameplay.
RD44 is the only MG that is not effected by this, and thus obviously the best MG in the game, since the reasoning for this (intermediate cartridge) doesn’t matter, because full power rifle cartridge MGs dont one hit down to begin with
hmm let me check with imperial percentage calculator
3-7= ~50%
so one machinegunner is aproximately 33% because 50 cant be split to 3
so it seem 3x33% is 99%
Fkng hell, look at that spank me and call me charlie brown. 3 machinegunners is indeed 99% of the 7 men squad and the rest 4 soldiers makes it 125% full squad.
Thanks imperial percentage calculations.
True, but its generally agreed upon that when you compared guns like pps and mp40 its quite enough.
Ofc we got some imperial math professors that goes every now and then full retard and comes up with arguments ptrd bestestest because bestestest ttk strawman arguments.
So in that sense, yes I do agree. TTK leaves way too much wiggling room for people that likes the taste of crayons.
But, you should just ignore them, like I should have ignored you.
Did I ? Ive always said its beast in CQC but due to other shortcomings such as not being that great at long range its kind of fine.
But its not like murrica doesnt have options, like Lanchester which is also better than GE counterparts.
The classic “Flank it brah” which apparently wasnt so good solution after all when the tables were turned.
Tell me more.
Yeah, That memeretta 20 vs ppsh41 was such biased move from devs, how the fk they though ppsh could ever compete with 20 round memeretta that is not capable to waste bullets like ppsh.
I dont mind the murricans get the wheelchair assists and want to “abandon” the ass-symmetrical balance thats fine.
But the benefits that murrica & ussr enjoyed of ass-ymmetrical balance must also be gone.
No cherry picking
Well, I would argue that back during beta, when MGs had NO dispersion at all, and they played like big assault rifles - MG34 in Moscow was quite powerful, combined with Panzer IV HE spam, Germany was pretty busted, also when Normandy got introduced FG42 was unrivaled, wastedwoodsman could have told you that. Also Tiger II H is still quite the target to deal with.
There were ups and downs for all factions, the biggest balance issues of the past in my opinion was Panzer IV H vs Jumbo, indeed beretta 20 vs drum PPSH, Panzer IV J vs T34 85, and Panther, Tiger, Jagdpanzer IV L70 vs what ever the allies had going back in the days.
All the LMG’s were quite great, but fixing that didnt really take long as ppsh41 box.
And one could argue that ever since the LMG’s have been and still are rather useless, disregarding few exceptions.
All the while the “LMG’s” has been scapegoat argument bout ass-ymmetrical balance
“soviets got smg’s & GE gets lmg’s”
If I recall the T28 was just as capable to do it, added with T50 / T34 with sloped armor issue making them impervous to GE tanks was also quite fun.
You could snipe the T50 or T34 turret but could not kill the rest of crew.
And again, devs really didnt have rush to fix that.
No doubt, and got nerfed & added that absolutely retarded semi as default.
Which remained long after sovjets got the avt.
They still have quite un-contested cas spam.
Another “issue” devs havent had much of rush to fix.
How often do you engage at 200m distance? Not to mention you are nit-picking at how it’s true that it’s ‘2-3 shots’ when there’s blantant dishonesty by first including 3 shots and also comparing it to MG-42 that ALSO takes 2 shot, which you have ‘conviniently omitted’ in your statement
So it’s not the best weapon in the game? Lmao. If a squad of seven avt40 is better than a squad of three rd44 and four avt40…then by your own logic the rd44 is not the best gun in game. Man you really botched yourself here. Should of just said you were wrong for saying that which is much more honorable than continuing to argue over something you said in a moment of german bias blindness…it happens to us all
Id say for this exact reason its better to stick on 1on1 comparison since this “overall” thinking leaves quite alot wigling room for people that enjoy crayons more than its healthy.
With your logic I could also claim due to “big picture” KT2 is inferior to pershing because once the meteor kills both KT’s to spawn pershing is the onlyone left alive.
So clearly, especiatly with you its better to stick to 1on1 comparison.
And in that comparison id say the RD44 indeed is quite beast.
@X_BloodBandit_X stop being so insanelly cringe have you ever seen the spreedsheets? at least once all your "arguments are even worse than red parrots ones hell i would say that even redparrots puts a smile on my face while reading how he is going mad but you no… all you are doing overall are pathetic arguments that not even the most biased soviet/german main could ever done i would even say that these would have alredy learned the lesson… hell… if i were you i would take a breath leave the forum read the sheets and memorize the most important aspects on at least 3 different languages (maybe thats optional…) and also i reccomend you to start doing some calculations about ““German superiority”” against US when it comes to fire arms damage armor and stuff like that and you would see that at the end of the day what makes the germans appear to be strongest nation is their player base which you even mentioned that is the most obvious thing
so if you trully want to buff allies maybe you should ask for a common sense perk for their players instead of crying while asking nonsense without any fundament
I say - delete this function of cuirass, like it only serves as a way to divide community, especially now with how unexpected the spike of this topic is (well greater chances to be heard)
But if i had to say - having 2 yes options may strike back, like based on 3 options “No” wins, there is no function? to kinda add up 2 “Yes” options they seem to be on their own, and that division between 2 “Yes” may bite back. Basically there should be 2 polls like:
Body armor?
Yay
Nay
If Nay
Delete only from Cuirass
Delete from all cosmetics
IMO but that way 2 “Yes” options are combined into 1 and you have greater chances to be seen and what especially needed to be heard
Well at least thats how i think votes work here and how moderators/helpers/etc may see and treat them
Ok, so bye
And would also apply to me and anyone who wants balance because everything would get FUCKING SCREWED (unless You aim to the torso) which would be fun cuz is the opposite that most shooters tell You “shooting at the head deals more damage sometimes Even oneshots” which would be cursed XD but no i won’t aprove this bo matter what
there’s another cosmetic with a buff which is exclusive from a German squad that gives You 80% head damage reduction so Yea for avoding complains is better to remove both
but you no… all you are doing overall are pathetic arguments that not even the most biased soviet/german main could ever done i would even say that these would have alredy learned the lesson… hell… if i were you i would take a breath leave the forum read the sheets and memorize the most important aspects on at least 3 different languages (maybe thats optional…) and also i reccomend you to start doing some calculations about ““German superiority”” against US when it comes to fire arms damage armor and stuff like that and you would see that at the end of the day what makes the germans appear to be strongest nation is their player base which you even mentioned that is the most obvious thing
