Remove the damage reduction from Soviet body armor before Manchuria drops

All the LMG’s were quite great, but fixing that didnt really take long as ppsh41 box.
And one could argue that ever since the LMG’s have been and still are rather useless, disregarding few exceptions.
All the while the “LMG’s” has been scapegoat argument bout ass-ymmetrical balance
“soviets got smg’s & GE gets lmg’s”

If I recall the T28 was just as capable to do it, added with T50 / T34 with sloped armor issue making them impervous to GE tanks was also quite fun.
You could snipe the T50 or T34 turret but could not kill the rest of crew.
And again, devs really didnt have rush to fix that.

No doubt, and got nerfed & added that absolutely retarded semi as default.
Which remained long after sovjets got the avt.

They still have quite un-contested cas spam.
Another “issue” devs havent had much of rush to fix.

4 Likes

It’s absolutely unheard of people going to different forums to vote on things after all.

The cope is unreal.

1 Like

How often do you engage at 200m distance? Not to mention you are nit-picking at how it’s true that it’s ‘2-3 shots’ when there’s blantant dishonesty by first including 3 shots and also comparing it to MG-42 that ALSO takes 2 shot, which you have ‘conviniently omitted’ in your statement

I don’t think you are describing us here

9 Likes

So it’s not the best weapon in the game? Lmao. If a squad of seven avt40 is better than a squad of three rd44 and four avt40…then by your own logic the rd44 is not the best gun in game. Man you really botched yourself here. Should of just said you were wrong for saying that which is much more honorable than continuing to argue over something you said in a moment of german bias blindness…it happens to us all

I think its M2 stinger, but thanks for asking.

Id say for this exact reason its better to stick on 1on1 comparison since this “overall” thinking leaves quite alot wigling room for people that enjoy crayons more than its healthy.

With your logic I could also claim due to “big picture” KT2 is inferior to pershing because once the meteor kills both KT’s to spawn pershing is the onlyone left alive.

So clearly, especiatly with you its better to stick to 1on1 comparison.
And in that comparison id say the RD44 indeed is quite beast.

7 Likes

so whos the ppl who are against? people who dont wanna stop using the armor cuz how hard to get all the costetics are?

1 Like

oh yes and before i forget

@X_BloodBandit_X stop being so insanelly cringe have you ever seen the spreedsheets? at least once all your "arguments are even worse than red parrots ones hell i would say that even redparrots puts a smile on my face while reading how he is going mad :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: but you no… all you are doing overall are pathetic arguments that not even the most biased soviet/german main could ever done i would even say that these would have alredy learned the lesson… hell… if i were you i would take a breath leave the forum read the sheets and memorize the most important aspects on at least 3 different languages (maybe thats optional…) and also i reccomend you to start doing some calculations about ““German superiority”” against US when it comes to fire arms damage armor and stuff like that and you would see that at the end of the day what makes the germans appear to be strongest nation is their player base which you even mentioned that is the most obvious thing

so if you trully want to buff allies maybe you should ask for a common sense perk for their players instead of crying while asking nonsense without any fundament

8 Likes

I say - delete this function of cuirass, like it only serves as a way to divide community, especially now with how unexpected the spike of this topic is (well greater chances to be heard)

But if i had to say - having 2 yes options may strike back, like based on 3 options “No” wins, there is no function? to kinda add up 2 “Yes” options they seem to be on their own, and that division between 2 “Yes” may bite back. Basically there should be 2 polls like:

Body armor?
Yay
Nay

If Nay
Delete only from Cuirass
Delete from all cosmetics

IMO but that way 2 “Yes” options are combined into 1 and you have greater chances to be seen and what especially needed to be heard

Well at least thats how i think votes work here and how moderators/helpers/etc may see and treat them
Ok, so bye

It over performs, like I wanted a BR2 thompson, but BR2 Thompsons need to have a 20rnd mag, not a 30rnd.

3 Likes

What would their reaction be if all Germans could wear this helmet :thinking:

2 Likes

This:

And would also apply to me and anyone who wants balance because everything would get FUCKING SCREWED (unless You aim to the torso) which would be fun cuz is the opposite that most shooters tell You “shooting at the head deals more damage sometimes Even oneshots” which would be cursed XD but no i won’t aprove this bo matter what

there’s another cosmetic with a buff which is exclusive from a German squad that gives You 80% head damage reduction so Yea for avoding complains is better to remove both

Stop being a child.

You know exactly what I mean.

4 Likes

This is probably the most sane alternative. keep it as gimmick for certain Squads, A Assault Engineer Squad being the perfect candidate

6 Likes

If they do this the damage reduction should only apply to 9 mm from things like pistols and SMGs only too. That thing is doing nothing against a 7.92

1 Like

At best, there are 10 people from the Ru forum here, most of whom definitely voted YES. Currently, 68 people have voted NO.

“We were just passing by.”
2025-12-15_08-17-49

1 Like

Well true not everyone knows exactly the stuff with these cosmétics and no everyone wants to read a wall of text

Source: made it the f up

whatever that means