Scotti naval better
TT means Tech tree.
still looking for that gotcha moment I see. doesn’t often end well
5 Likes
last time i checked you cant buy scotti naval rifles on demand for your entire army
10 Likes
Wasnt Scotti a two hit kill with a smaller mag than Fedorov?
1 Like
Love how people constantly pretend like u.s. doesn’t exist in this game. 1 hit kill for days, leagues better than federov vs Germans. Small mag doesn’t even matter.
the hyde isnt a good assault rifle. its just ok. doesnt excel in anything unlike the other assault rifles
I dont recall murrica having hidden buffs such as bodyarmor ?
Then again nerf meteor is rather frequent subject of topic.
8 Likes
It does - vs US its a FG42 with 15 round mag = worse
Vs soviets its a FG42 with two hit kills and 15 round mags - even much worse
There is a reason why I skipped that BP, that gun is pointless and literally worse than its TT alternatives.
5 Likes
soooo hows discussion goin : D?
1 Like
hell im surprised that 38% of people deny the existence of bias or want to live with it as when it comes to the people who deny the existence of body armor why not removing it anyways if it ““trully doesnt exists”” why going crazy over a cosmetic with a ““not impacful advantage”” or maybe you are hiding something 
just let the dirty german mains get what they want and thats it why making a whole fucking human barrier over something that is inssinificant?
5 Likes
I’m genuinely wondering if some Soviet mains got alts to vote no. Even so 35% + 27% =62% so in general people want body armor removed.
12 Likes
Because it doesnt matter, much like people asking for “these boots has wrong shoelaces” type of thing.
Totally un-noticeable.
What really matters is that soviet smg’s deals 0.2 or 0.4 less dmg thats something you truely can see.
2 Likes
True, sometimes random people don’t believe me if I mention this, lol.
1 Like
Nah must be people from ru forum remember a AG-2 Post i Made?
Welp
I got posted into a telegram link and i’m sure people came to it same could have happened with this post
5 Likes
Well, things are usually like that in our half of the forum.
3 Likes
Well i didint get mad at Tka4enk0 in fact the first thing i thought was
Hell Yea i’m famous on the other side 
3 Likes
Russian players are mega Soviet biased. A lot of them really believe that Soviets are a weak nation and that MG-42 is better than RD-44 or that FG-42 II is better than AVT40(20) because of the higher RoF
Could be that they gathered here to just spam vote ‘no’ but still didnt manage to break the 50% mark so who cares. Even less with the fact that at first the post had overwhelmingly positive response with barely 30% being against it
And then again essentially all of the reasoning behind those people who vote no are reduced to:
- It doesnt matter/doesnt happen as much
- But it was user irl and worked irl
- But what about the Soviets being weak!
When all of this was already refuted. If devs remain ignorant about this when clearly majority of people want it removed then Im starting a war
11 Likes
There are some files i have on My profile regarding about FG42 on escense the avt-40 20 is same as the 15 rounds ver just with 5 rounds more and thats it
Theres are more date i places on EVA posts regarding abt fg42 ii
Hope it helps : D And pls btw ask for it’s bayonet
But overall we all know body armor is the Main issue and the elephant on the conversation
1 Like
Ah, don’t be like that. There’s even some Russian guys, who voted for buff removal and your video actually helped me promote it, so we’re all kind of different there 
2 Likes
I’d like to see even one of the Soviets mains try to give a reason why armor is fair for the soviets.
In this entire discussion all I have seen so far is that they claim it should stay because it has no effect.
(Which is the dumbest excuse I have ever seen in a video game)
- or actually one of them claimed how when removing body armor PPS 43 should get a two hit kill damage buff in return, because MP40 would obviously be too strong.
What a bunch of clowns.
9 Likes