Hello ! The way the rank system works is problematic.
What it’s done is that players who want to play seriously will systematically choose Germany or Japan, while everyone else just loses (a 1-2 years ago, I had an 83% win rate with Germany, 78% with Japan, 17% with the USA, and 30% with the USSR, now it’s the opposite). If you wanted a high rank, you would always play Germany or Japan, and all the best players would do the same. And if you wanted a high rank, it was impossible to play the USA, for example; they just kept losing.
The problem is that this has created a huge imbalance; everyone who played to win went for Germany. To fix this imbalance, the armies and maps were modified accordingly. And as a result of these changes, the USSR became overpowered, and Japan is disastrous; the game mechanics have been reversed because of this migration.
Now, there’s a massive migration towards the USSR, and it’s impossible to beat in urban environments, especially anywhere automatic weapons are effective. Take an urban map, for example: Germany has an 80% chance of losing.
Its weapons have become far too powerful (especially submachine guns, but even the SVT-38 is infinitely more effective than the Gewehr 41; it has less recoil, a detachable 10-round magazine, and is even better than the Gewehr 43 in Br-4). There’s a huge imbalance that didn’t exist before. Now, with this massive migration towards the USSR, Germany is winning much less because Russian weapons are more effective, and people are starting to migrate to compensate.
To solve this problem, the rank point lost when you lose a battle should be removed. At a stretch, you could increase the number of ranks between each rank to compensate, but this loss mechanic, which encourages players to choose the best nations, really needs to be eliminated. As long as this point deduction mechanism remains, the balance will be disastrous.
However, we can keep the point deduction for desertion, but not for the team or anything team-related. Alternatively, we could award more points, perhaps even an extra point, if the person whose rallying points were used the most by the team.
This system is very easy to modify and can have an excellent effect. Removing it won’t pose any problems. So we might as well remove it to see what happens. Besides, it’s fundamentally unfair.
- Yes
- No