Please don’t let this be the way to get decals for tanks… As a fomo reward from events
7 Likes
If you knew this was a game balance issue, and not a problem with any particular piece of equipment, you wouldn’t be making up excuses to fob me off.
What are you talking about?
BR5 is currently dominated by GE and JP.
I’ve only been referring to the situation in BR5 from the beginning.
Hopefully not. Hopefully our “beloved” devs actually implement a way to get standard decals without having to pay gold or thru events
I get that we make more points now, but I still think they should at least make it catch-up able though. Where each stage unlocks after 2 days. and you can complete all unlocked stages to catch up.
Yes you can miss a couple days and still get rewards, but sometimes it feels like Im squeezing time in during the work nights. Simple change where instead of 1-2 hours per day / 2-3 hours every other day… If I could do the event in a 6 hour+ sessions on my days off to catch up would make these events feel so much better and less stressful as a whole.
As a bonus this would benefit new players (or returning players) that return in the middle of the event.
1 Like
If you’re complaining about BP 5, why can’t others complain about BP 3 and the overuse of chest armor?
1 Like
yes, the difference being different transmission/engine bay and slightly different armor layout giving +15 mm to isu 152, anything else? Enlighten me
Let’s discuss the overuse of BP3 and chest armor. The Soviet Union and the United States were very strong in terms of Tier 3 equipment
The thing I keep pointing out is Tank, but please don’t bring up anything else.
This is the most serious issue than the infantry problem, and frankly, the GE on BR3 has been better than I thought since the addition of KE-7.
Of course if you have Mkb42 15 is not a problem for body armor but this is not TT so I’ll go off the table.
KE-7 is a really good weapon.
Just as the US abandons SMG and uses BAR in BR3, it’s time for GE to use KE-7 as its main.
Of course, if there are a lot of Mkb42 15s, it’s better to make this the main one.
Honestly, this is not a big deal because I’m a veteran player, so I have quite a few weapons like this.
Of course, the U.S. also uses 30.cal Thompson as its main.
I’m using it for 3 squads.
Yes, the ISU-152M is a modified and upgraded version of a heavy tank destroyer from the early Cold War period.
Win rate doesn’t really matter since it dose not show nothing really only how good your team is. But yes I agree Axis BR V is not weak at all but you point my friend is showing nothing. But BR V is the most balanced BR.
No wonder you cant roll out next time im not gonna even argue with you rookie … xD
2 Likes
Everything has come full circle. If the Breastplates hadn’t been overused, the Axis powers wouldn’t have needed to make any changes at BP 3.
Moreover, the Thompson submachine gun was better than the Axis light machine guns, especially for Chinese squads. So, you know why I complained.
Back to square one, it’s a problem with BR5.
I’m only pointing out the issue of BR5 from the beginning.
For the current BR5,
The infantry is golden balance, but Tank advantage is huge
No, you need to solve BP3 before talking about BP5. Skipping levels won’t solve anything.
I have no idea why we’re moving on to BR3 here.
I’m talking about the issue of BR5 from the beginning, please don’t change the point.
That’s why your persuasion is losing power.
Obviously started as a problem with BR5 due to ISU-152.
Of course BR3 is a problem that needs to be fixed, but please don’t blur the point of the conversation.
We can talk about the issue after the debate on BR5.
Or was he arguing about BR3 from the beginning.
But BR5’s debate due to ISU-152 in the first place, so this is the focus.
1 Like
Facts speak louder than words. Just wait and see the test videos on Bilibili and YouTube. I believe the ISU-152 will only bring disaster to infantry squads, just like the KV-2.
I think it’s from wanting to move the SiG 2 down to br 2
3 Likes
It’s not that the argument itself is flawed, but rather that Soviet players liked to intentionally use excessively powerful equipment to rack up kills. For example, the Thompson submachine gun used by the Chinese squad had a very stable rate of fire and recoil, but players still recommended unnecessarily buffing it.