I mean, it’s really wrong.
ISU-152 is not at all equivalent to Ho-Ri and Ferdinand, and Ho-Ri and Ferdinand have a much larger advantage.
And what I want is not irrelevant to BR5’s problem, like BR down on ISU-152
The addition of the T-44-100 and the M9A1 bazooka loaded with the T59 Rocket (230mm) must be added to the TT.
Your assumption is invalid because the armor of all the vehicles mentioned above is thinner than that of the KV-2. The high-explosive shells of the StuG IV short-barreled gun were already rendered useless by the nerfs, and now you’re targeting premium vehicles. Honestly, I’ve never seen such shamelessness
they aren’t equal in the slightest, sorry but this won’t work here
I mean Soviet bias is not new…
Always been this way.
(Example being mp40 being br3 during the merge, while pps42 was br2!!! Or earlier, ppsh41 facing beretta with a 20 rounds mag in Moscow… armour… etc.)
Devs are russian, mostly. You see this in WT as well to some degree…
So while it’s true there’s obvious bias, their games ARE fun, still.
If you learn to live with, there’s a lot of fun to be had.
I take it like a meme. There’s bias because they won the war!
… You can also desert matches with Soviets and just play balanced matches against, or as, allies, if that’s your thing, I suppose…
7 Likes
A Soviet player doesn’t even know the tank history of their own faction, and they still dare to comment? Don’t embarrass yourself!
1 Like
Great now we have debate about ISU. Where are the “people always find thing to complain” people at huh? Now you dont show your face?
4 Likes
People in the forums, as I said:
6 Likes
My dear British friend, I understand the current situation, but for the sake of WWII history and game balance, there are some things we still need to fight for and protest. After all, I’ve played all the factions, but the Soviet Union has become too invincible. The game becomes incredibly boring. If the Soviet Union won from the start, then tell me, since we already know how the story ends, is there any point in continuing to play?
Yeah i know and tbh it tiring me out now.
3 Likes
Same.
I’m trying to meme it, but even I get tired. It’s always the same…
3 Likes
Its always something.
Back in my day it was Tiger 2 opression, than spawn zone camping, than flame thrower meta, now battle rifle meta slop etc etc
body armor haters complained that Japan will get run over, turns out Japan is completely Op in BR5.
What people hate, and whats actually powerful are different things to my eye. That includes my biases.
Re current event, Soviets were missing SU/ISU series in game, this is the first variant of it. Im happy to see that. Dont need to overthink it.
1 Like
That’s right.
The issue of body armor is due to Sword TT, the infantry balance of SV vs JP is more golden than I thought because of the advantage of movement speed.
If that’s the case, for game balance, I think it would be fair to add the Grizzly IV assault gun, the Churchill assault tank, and Japan’s large-caliber assault guns as well. Otherwise, it would be too unfair for the Soviet faction to have them while the other factions don’t!
you don’t know anything lol, stop screaming
To quote an American friend, “Either everyone has it, or nobody uses it. The cuirass can’t become the Soviet Union’s exclusive right; other camps also have the right to use it.”
Honestly, it’s not a big deal in SV vs JP.
JP also has a Sword TT, so the infantry balance is pretty good, no matter which BR you go to.
The real problem is the tank problem, but in the case of BR3, JP is vulnerable because JP does not have BR3 AT, and in BR5, SV is weak in AT and tank, so SV is vulnerable in BR5.
I’m glad the map isn’t a good one for the tank (except the airfield)
Well if there was a debuff for wearing it, like being slower, it wouldn’t have gotten to this point
1 Like
They didn’t win the war while being debuffed!!!
1 Like
KWK37 HE never got nerfed, show me the update log if you persist
just calc the tnt amount
ISU 152 isn’t a big deal
| gun | reload | tnt | tnt/sec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75mm KwK37 | 3.3 | 686 | 207.9 | |
| 88mm KwK43 | 8.5 | 1000 | 117.6 | |
| 150mmn s.I.G 33 | 11.1 | 8600 | 774.8 | |
| 75mm M2 | 3.3 | 666 | 201.8 | |
| 75mm M3 | 5 | 666 | 133.2 | |
| 105mm M4 | 10 | 2200 | 220.0 | |
| 76mm L-11 | 7.1 | 621 | 87.5 | |
| 122mm D-25T | 21 | 3600 | 171.4 | |
| 152mm M-10T | 33.3 | 5800 | 174.2 | KV2 |
| 152 mm ML-20S | 27.7 | 5900 | 213.0 | ISU152(reload on guess) |
The US and the USSR were both level 3 and 5 strong, while Germany and Japan were level 2 and 4 strong. Tell me where the problem lies.