You mean the temu Thompson?
No.
Absolute ISU-152 couldn’t be better than Ho-Ri or Ferdinand.
ISU-152 is easy to destroy with AT Soldier, as I mentioned above.
But Ho-Ri or Ferdinand can never be destroyed.
Why?
This is because the front armor are ridiculously high.
Our AT have a max penetration of 200mm, and their minimum armor start at 200mm.
It’s impossible to penetrate.
This is Ofenrohr, and even if it’s Panzerfaust 100, it’s 220mm penetration, and even if the angle is slightly twisted, it’s less penetration, and most of all, the opponent is Ofenrohr, which can easily destroy the tank even at 200-300m, while with Panzerfaast 100, that distance is almost impossible.
That’s Why US and SV must need M9A1 with T59 Rocket (min 230mm pen)
3 Likes
The Sichuan Thompson, a Chinese submachine gun from Sichuan that’s even more stable than the MG-30 light machine gun.
1 Like
I personally think the Thompson is alright, it’s the squad thay needs changing, more specifically to have thier Chinese uniforms available to them.
1 Like
no it’s not
At BP 5, aerial bombs can eliminate all armored vehicles; this applies to all tanks. Therefore, you don’t need to argue for the ISU 152’s downgrade, because the answer is pinpoint bombing.
I’m just going to jump in here and remind you all to keep the conversation on-topic, civil, and respectful.
The sun is out, the day is warm, and I really don’t want to spoil it for anyone with the gag hammer. So let’s keep it peaceful, yeah? 
11 Likes
It’s more of a problem if you include the plane.
Because SV’s plane is the most horrible, GE has CAS power of 1st, and JP has Kikka is OP Jet.
I don’t want to mention how my Tiger II was turned into scrap metal by American players using bombers at BP 5, so the ISU-152 was no exception.
You’re discussing Japan, I’m talking about the US, so the issues are incompatible. If you want to strengthen the Soviet Union, Germany must also be strengthened, especially in terms of anti-tank weapons.
Seriously ditch KTH and use Ferdinand.
It won’t be destroyed even if the GP500lb falls next to it.
I’ve been hitted this up a lot.
After feeling it, the direction of the nerf in the Meteor was wrong, and I immediately bought Shooting Star.
DF clever guys
Don’t worry, this is just a simple, rational discussion, not an argument or a flame war. Enjoy the midday sun in peace. 
placing isu152 where it should be isn’t strenghtening
I really hope that Enlisted will release the new German anti-tank rocket launcher next time, so that we can take down the Allied steel behemoths directly instead of letting them snipe us from the shadows.
2 Likes
The Bison 2 infantry gun should also be returned to its original position; malicious competition benefits no one.
Now all the tanks in US and SV are easily destroyed by Ofenrohr.
From the front, of course.
That’s how bad the armor are.
If have IS-3 (300mm) on BR6, then welcome to M20 Super Bazooka and Panzerfaust 150.
But now there’s no tank that’s that ignorant yet with good armor.
1 Like
No because it fires three times faster
1 Like
Will developers finally adress problems with the new saboteur class or will they abandon it just like they did with rider class??
1 Like
A ww2 tank that did not see any use.
The T-44A (85mm) was deliberately withheld from combat use for the entire war and the T-44-100 were just two 1 off prototypes.
While having some wierd prototype modification of a tank that did see service would be more believable in a WW 2 setting. Having a rare 1 off modification of a tank that isnt even supposed to be in combat just is beyond stupid.
At that point you might aswell mix in post war tanks just like WT does and you will get an similarly immersive WW 2 experiance.
1 Like
I don’t think that’s bad either, but I think it’ll be okay because it’s BR6 with added Korea War campaign if it goes that far.
By then, other factions will have tanks that match it.
But I think We’ll have to wait years to get there.
Of course, developers are also thinking of adding Korea war, but it takes too long.