Reinforcements received: Hit & Run

News
43

I’d like to ask the developers to reconsider the current ammunition setup of the Pz. IV E and Pz. IV F1.

Previously, these tanks had regular HE shells, which made them very useful in their infantry-support role. After the change, the HE was replaced with HEAT.

HEAT is useful against enemy tanks, but completely removing the regular HE significantly reduces the effectiveness of these short-barreled Pz. IVs against infantry, AT guns, MG positions, and enemies inside buildings.

Could you please consider one of these compromises for the upcoming update?

  • Bring back regular HE and give the tanks a limited number of HEAT rounds, for example 7–10 HEAT shells.
  • Or replace the AP/APCBC ammunition with HEAT while keeping the regular HE.

This would allow the Pz. IV E/F1 to retain their original infantry-support capability while still having some anti-tank capability from HEAT.

3 Likes
44

5dfeb19e14911
5dfeb19e149111024×784 85.5 KB

The .50 cal is interesting, but this squad is… disappointing.

This would have been a fantastic opportunity to add an SAS squad instead of another American one. (the third in a row)

It wouldn’t even be hard to do:
Take the standard Jeep,
give it a British squad (maybe reusing the existing SAS squad customization to speed things up),
and mount a couple of Vickers K guns on the front (which are already in the game).

Maximum result, zero effort.

image
image

10 Likes
45

nah m2 willys just makes sense, although the M3 soviet apc’s m2 hits like wet noodles and needs like what, 3-4 shots to kill? they’ll probably make willys same

1 Like
46

They forwarded it. Alles Klar?

So finally we will get rid of Chivalry 2 gameplay mechanics xD

47

There’s something that occurs to me…
For Japan, we have a TT bike with a Te-4, a BR4 MG, on BR1.
Now they have added a TT jeep squad with the same number of soldiers, lower speed, lower power to weight ratio and shitty Type 11, a BR1 MG, and put it on BR2.
For the life of me, I can’t see the logic in that.

2 Likes
48

You can thank the folks here who complained it was so historically inaccurate or what not… not that i give a shit… ill never touch it.

1 Like
49

can yall please revert back to 20k every 2 days… just because you made it give you more points on objectives which doesn’t even work if the enemies are far from the objectives when killed it just promotes camping in planes and tanks or farming trash air raids

7 Likes
50

I Agree 20 k every two days, unless you’re playing conquest it can be hard to get 25 k (assault mode comes to mind). Love the M2hb Jeep, 3 soldiers is a bit stink though, if they don’t increase the squad-size then the driver should be replaceable for another 3rd specialist, no issues with the Italian 5 man squad, looks like it could make a dent on the field.

3 Likes
51

More garbage , wheres the 20 maps you owe us, you fargin iceholes?

1 Like
52

Would’ve been better if it was a SAS squad instead of another American squad.

I might use this. Seems like a interesting vehicle. And the fact it’s Italian is great.

Also, is japana nd the Soviets gonna get a even jeep like vehicle too? It took a while for the U.S.A. and Japan to get a event assault engineers

7 Likes
53

Yes lets celebrate a low bar event by smothering it in coconut oil

54

Very nice event vehicles, the Italian one is especially cool! Really hope the Japanese and Soviets will get something nice too! :grin:

3 Likes
55

agree

1 Like
56

What, still gone?

I am more disappointed in how they messed up the selectable fuel amount for planes
(some work, some dont: check the gauge)

57

It would have to be the long range desert group because the sas squad is already in the game.

2 Likes
58

Yeah. I played the plane yesterday and looking behind me. Rear Gunner was / is still not visible

1 Like
59

they better both be useful as AA

60

Will there be a new nickname decoration for players who have logged in daily for 5 years?

61

I remember seeing the AS42 on a custom map quite a long time ago. Its weapons couldn’t be used. What I recalled is that there was also a PT boat. The PT boat might be implemented in some form in the future as well, but I don’t know how they would do it.

62

I would assume that’s an issue with if the planes gauges are portly modeled.