For some reason i don’t think this was possible
I only briefly sifted through the comments, so my apologies if I missed stuff outside of the OP that was already addressed.
If the Stinger was tested/compatible with 100 and 200 round ammo boxes, could we potentially see a version with a 100 round magazine for the tech tree, or would they have to resort to a prototype that didn’t see combat to give the Allies tree a proper BR 5 machine gun?
Also, I feel like the 200 rounds isn’t really…“problematic”, considering it’s an event weapon, and I’d argue anything beyond the 100 round standard for the BR becomes negligible, even with it’s rate of fire.
that was not his argument, he said that as the reason of why they did it IRL
not exactly sure what you are trying to present here, 20 rounds to kill 1 player indeed seems pretty shit accuracy.
Excuse me? Have you just forgotten the discussion?
Can you not read the quote? Can you do that in real life? No.
Can you do that in real life with less than 20 shots? No.
here’s what I think
add an ANM2 stinger to the tech tree with 100 rounds
keep the event ANM2 stinger with 200 rounds but make it unable to ADS when standing up, since I’d assume trying to shoulder an aircraft machinegun with 200 rounds of .30-06 attached to it would be impossible
5 Likes
yeah so is firing the type 97 into the sky without breaking half of your body… but you don’t want to add forced mount to fire for that now do you… this isn’t changing the topic… you don’t get to cherry pick things from the historical accuracy basket only when it fits your liking.
i have to acknowledge however how disgusted i am that you try and further this garbage addition to the game… if anything it should be so machine guns like browning can be justified for BR3… not because you don’t like heavy hitting machine gun… because that’s what it is… not because you wouldn’t do it in real life because see above.
This was my thought too! Let’s make it happen!
I’d rather not see a weapon of which 6 existed added into the TT. That’s even worse than the japanese TT rifles
If you don’t like prototypes don’t play BRIV+ simple… let us that enjoy the fast paced and high power weapons advance on the playground that has been provided to us.
No, there should never be Prototypes in the TT. They’re event weapons and that’s it. There’s no reason to see five thousand T20s when barely five had been produced before the war ended, this isn’t fantasy wonderland.
It quite literally is in BRV so… haha… exactly my point
type 97 ATR is the only anti tank rifle available for Japan and its strength is to compensate for Japan’s complete armor weakness at BR1
USA has machine guns that perform their job good enough at BR5
“but muh historical accuracy”
Once again… you don’t get to use an argument only when it applies to what you like… well you can but it looks very one sided from where i’m standing.
Like i get where you’re coming from but you don’t get to try and cut the balls off one of the best machine guns for US only for whatever reason… for what?
1 Like
Because Willy don’t like it.
I think 100 rounds should be the limit for all machine guns in this game because less bullet spam is better
It’s not the most friendly thing to say but again just don’t play it? You don’t like bullet spam… cool! Go play where all the magazines are virtually capped at 30… you’re welcome to… but you play with the big cats and then try to put everything down to where you think it should be…
BR4 would be my ideal environment but they just get lumped together with BR5 so naturally I just play BR5 to not get put at an disadvantage.
Maybe the ANM2 stinger would be more appropriate to me if the ROF wasnt as high as it is combined with its capacity
1 Like
It very much isn’t. There’s still a good deal of WW2 equipment in there, and even it was there’s no place for that in Enlisted.