1040 a minute with 20 rounds? That’s not good my dude. With that little ammo and that high rate of fire it’s not a good gun
It seems that just because this post wants to increase the BR of all Thompsons from BR2 of the Western Allies you also want to increase the BR of the Thompson 1921 just because "if the Western allies can’t have Thompsons in BR2, nobody can.
Because wanting a Thompson with a 20-round magazine and a 1040 rate of fire in the BR3 doesn’t make much sense.
The M1A1 and 7.63 got this but the shichuan I see moving a gun up of down a Br more of a last resort than “eh fuck it make it br4” that’s why I you know. Nerf the Shichuan rather than move it in br
The M1A1 I disagreed with since the get go it happened to be in br2 plus with the sheet the gun is weirdly close to the Lanchester but it does more dmg and the slightest difference in spread .02 more than the Lanchester’s .71
Why does this seem illogical? According to studies of the American 3BR and 4BR, these weapons are superior. Overall, the 3BR is clearly not a 2BR.
Studies? Can you cite these studies or do you mean you looked at the stats?
Studies? Looking at the statistics for a few seconds?
None of the Thompson from the Western allies deserve to be BR2, maybe in the future other thompsons with 20-round magazines could fill this gap, but for now none are BR2.
Yeah it’s not like we have the 20 round magazine for it or anything like imagine a M1A1 20 or a M1 20 great for the USMC larping or Normandy
Also Japanese Thompson.
Why? 20 rounds and a 1040 rate of fire in BR3? Xd
You have no reason to put the Thompson 1921 in the BR3, you only say it should be BR3 but don’t give any reason.
Two images, cool