Problems with Japanese swords

here is chatgpt answer cause i was lazy

For the SVT-38, the standard issue to Soviet soldiers was two detachable 10-round magazines.

Key context (important for accuracy):

  • Although the SVT-38 used detachable magazines, Soviet doctrine did not treat them as expendable or numerous items the way later Western armies did.
  • Soldiers were expected to reload the magazines using 5-round Mosin-Nagant stripper clips while the magazine remained in the rifle.
  • Extra magazines beyond the two issued were rare in frontline service, especially in 1939–1941.

Why only two magazines?

  • Magazines were relatively expensive and seen as semi-permanent components.
  • Logistical shortages and conservative doctrine favored clip loading.
  • This practice carried over from Mosin-Nagant training.

Comparison for clarity:

  • SVT-38: typically 2 magazines
  • SVT-40: also usually 2 magazines (occasionally 3 in later or guard units, but not standard)

So, while the SVT-38 was technically a detachable-magazine rifle, in practice it functioned more like a clip-loaded rifle with a removable magazine, and soldiers were not issued large numbers of magazines.

sources for it

https://media.wfyi.org/fireandice/history/weaponry_soviet_sa.htm

here is non direct evidence from soviet equipment :

AVS-36 and SVT-38/40 pouches.
With the acceptance of AVS-36, the first self loading rifle in service with the RKKA , special pouches were designed to hold the 15 round magazines. Each pouch could hold two magazines and were bigger than the later introduced SVT-38 &40 10 round magazine pouches.
In 1939 the new self loading rifle SVT-38, and in 1940 SVT-40 entered service respectively. Internally, the pouch was split with horizontal divider for two SVT magazines. Early SVT pouches,1939- early 1941 had D ring. In summer 1941, production of SVT pouches was stopped, and a new simplified model was introduced that could be be used either for SVT magazines or Mosin clips. Internally, there were two folding leather dividers i.e. horizontal for two SVT magazine and vertical for four Mosin clips. Pouches were made in leather, canvas and kirza material with Y closure strap, solid closure strap and differing hardware construction (riveting, stitching etc).
​​
Below: Left , AVS-36 pouch. Centre, SVT-38/40 pouch. Right, SVT-38/40 pouch showing interior magazine divider.

Picture Picture Picture

Below: Top. Interior of of a 1941 simplified SVT-40 pouch.Left to Right, showing horizontal and vertical folding leather dividers, vertical divider folded to hold two SVT magazines and horizontal divider folded to hold four 5 round Mosin clips.
Bottom. A 1941 SVT pouch and magazine and 5 round clip. An economy SVT-40 pouch, similarly produced in canvas and kirza material.
​​

Picture Picture Picture

Picture Picture

In 1941, the WW1 chest pouch (bandoleer) was reintroduced. 1941 bandoleers mostly had six pockets only for ammunition in clips, but some also had a pocket for a SVT magazine. Versions with the SVT magazine pocket were only produced in 1941-1945.

search forum suggestions and you will see people quote high ROF documents

5 Likes

This “im the victim here retribution” topic appeared about 2mins after hes what ever reasons were rejected by technically everyone in the bodyarmor topic.

1 Like

il save him from the burden.

Irony here is this exact same website has clocked ~800 rof for PPS43, which we have in the game.
While numerous other sources suggest PPs43 to have approximately 600-700? rof
Like this one

But apparently source like this is fine, as long as it benefits sovjets but not so much regarding fnab.

1 Like

This is getting way off topic.

it’s a pretty resounding no homeboi swords are unique to the Japanese and should remain so if you want swords just play the japanese.

Every faction has their unique gimmick U.S/Britain can stack vehicles Japan has speed boosted swords Germany gets low tier belt fed machine guns and laser beam SMGs and Russia gets body armor that wasn’t widely fielded.

1 Like

pretty normal for this forum…

1 Like

A Mag reload on BR3, Bayonets on their ARs, an AR with 4.3 damage more than their competition, no movement dispersion on their BR5 LMG.

2 Likes

and if we just make axes run like if these were swords?

1 Like

good choise

What exactly you mean? Sounds interesting!

Which one?

light semi-carbine VG1-5 with 30 rounds

Bayonets on br2 smg

even worse than M1 carabine hell last time i used ts i preffered to use a knife instead

your federovs got also a bayonet aswell and we didint asked for it same goes to other stupid nonsense

and whats the problem of having a bayonet on br 2? i have to remember you that ussr have a rifle that one shoot on br 2 and its semi auto with “beautiful and unstopable bayonet”

1 Like

Do I need to comment even :joy: Japanese swords are bigger we don’t need to overcompensate with body armor for the lack of sword size :crossed_swords:

2 Likes


in my experience U.S/Great Britain is the only faction that can stack like this Germany can sorta do it but it’s never as good

At rank 3 I can have 2 shermans and an M10 2 P-51s and the XA-38.

At rank 2 I stack M8 Scotts, and everyone knows how op the Scott can be

Saw a post about it on the reddit… you could literally sit in the other than this situation useless tech tree spitfire and ruin his day.

But people choose to complain to deliverers instead.

Keep in mind you have to sell your soul to the snail to do it though there’s no pay to win my ass.