That’s means you’re tryna nerf Japan, are you that scared they’re gonna take away body armor?
That’s only one of the options given…
What’s your point? It’s still an option
The goal here isn’t to nerf Japan it’s consistency which is fair imo. Impact mines are a fun gimmick but the axes having a lower sprint speed than the shin into always felt wrong to me.
1 Like
Until the holes in Japans tech tree get plugged it’s fair.
Every tree has holes man.
Japan is still a good nation. Unfair bullshit doesn’t excuse unfair bullshit. Grow up
1 Like
I’d rather keep things like the Shin Gunto because they make each faction more unique. I don’t want every meal to taste the same and I don’t want every faction to play the same.
I have the same problem with people who say body armor should be outright removed, body armor encourages a different play style that makes Russia feel different to me. The same thing goes with the Shin Gunto.
Not to mention that the Shin Gunto is one of the few advantages Japan has against its adversaries, and that it’s not even very noticeable unless someone is explicitly using it in their tactics because 99% of the time you’re going to be holding your gun and not your sword.
There’s things that make nations more unique and things that make nations less fair. Anti impact mine is unique. It has opportunity cost and it’s not the meta option but it’s a fun piece of usable identity. Being able to charge 50 percent faster with a specific faction and no other ones is bs. They’ll still have swords instead of axes it’s just the axes will be more in line. They’ll still have identity without sacrificing balance.
I still believe asymmetric balance has its place in Enlisted, so I can’t agree with changes that make each faction closer to just reskins of each other.
Sorry you can’t agree with balance. Damn shame
Weirdo
I didn’t hear a no 
Personally, I think we should at least provide assistance to all factions.
Default small dagger - Increase movement speed to 120%
To correspond to the game’s setting where the cutting tool runs the fastest
Nothing else needs to be changed. The reinforcements from the Japanese faction enter the battlefield much faster than those from other factions. Just consider it as a game feature.
It would be even better if some activities related to giving out the swords were included.
1 Like
I said, “Buddy, there’s nothing about the Soviet Union or anything like that mentioned here.”
Rather, it was a proposal that other factions should also be treated better.
I said that you were doing this entirely targeting his personal character, rather than the event itself.
Such behavior is extremely embarrassing.
I’m even ashamed of your behavior now…
You need to exhibit more decent and positive behavior, acting like a gentleman rather than a scoundrel.
1 Like
Why weaken the Japanese factions?
It would be wiser to strengthen other factions instead.
Isn’t it??
This way, it can better please the gamers.
1 Like
Show me
Show me
You really want that?
Exactly. the Shin Gunto isn’t game breaking its a slight advantage that most people don’t even take advantage of. It’s not like body armor where you just put it on and forget about it.
Well, the most important part in a game - speed - and here singuto helps much more. I dream to have swords for all my axis\allied\soviet boys - it helps my quite often to win
1 Like
So, quickly remove those bulletproof vest attributes.
Let him only exist as a decorative feature with an appearance trait. This way, there will be no unnecessary talk from everyone.
Those heavy burdens offer no benefit at all in the top-floor rooms.
In this way, the Soviet SMG weapons could also be enhanced to provide equivalent combat capabilities for other factions.
Only in this way can I be the happiest.
here is chatgpt answer cause i was lazy
For the SVT-38, the standard issue to Soviet soldiers was two detachable 10-round magazines.
Key context (important for accuracy):
- Although the SVT-38 used detachable magazines, Soviet doctrine did not treat them as expendable or numerous items the way later Western armies did.
- Soldiers were expected to reload the magazines using 5-round Mosin-Nagant stripper clips while the magazine remained in the rifle.
- Extra magazines beyond the two issued were rare in frontline service, especially in 1939–1941.
Why only two magazines?
- Magazines were relatively expensive and seen as semi-permanent components.
- Logistical shortages and conservative doctrine favored clip loading.
- This practice carried over from Mosin-Nagant training.
Comparison for clarity:
- SVT-38: typically 2 magazines
- SVT-40: also usually 2 magazines (occasionally 3 in later or guard units, but not standard)
So, while the SVT-38 was technically a detachable-magazine rifle, in practice it functioned more like a clip-loaded rifle with a removable magazine, and soldiers were not issued large numbers of magazines.
sources for it
https://media.wfyi.org/fireandice/history/weaponry_soviet_sa.htm
here is non direct evidence from soviet equipment :
AVS-36 and SVT-38/40 pouches.
With the acceptance of AVS-36, the first self loading rifle in service with the RKKA , special pouches were designed to hold the 15 round magazines. Each pouch could hold two magazines and were bigger than the later introduced SVT-38 &40 10 round magazine pouches.
In 1939 the new self loading rifle SVT-38, and in 1940 SVT-40 entered service respectively. Internally, the pouch was split with horizontal divider for two SVT magazines. Early SVT pouches,1939- early 1941 had D ring. In summer 1941, production of SVT pouches was stopped, and a new simplified model was introduced that could be be used either for SVT magazines or Mosin clips. Internally, there were two folding leather dividers i.e. horizontal for two SVT magazine and vertical for four Mosin clips. Pouches were made in leather, canvas and kirza material with Y closure strap, solid closure strap and differing hardware construction (riveting, stitching etc).
Below: Left , AVS-36 pouch. Centre, SVT-38/40 pouch. Right, SVT-38/40 pouch showing interior magazine divider.
Below: Top. Interior of of a 1941 simplified SVT-40 pouch.Left to Right, showing horizontal and vertical folding leather dividers, vertical divider folded to hold two SVT magazines and horizontal divider folded to hold four 5 round Mosin clips.
Bottom. A 1941 SVT pouch and magazine and 5 round clip. An economy SVT-40 pouch, similarly produced in canvas and kirza material.
In 1941, the WW1 chest pouch (bandoleer) was reintroduced. 1941 bandoleers mostly had six pockets only for ammunition in clips, but some also had a pocket for a SVT magazine. Versions with the SVT magazine pocket were only produced in 1941-1945.
search forum suggestions and you will see people quote high ROF documents
6 Likes