The Germans already have enough submachine guns. The PPSh41 is unnecessary for Germany; no more copying and pasting is needed.
Would you be so kind as to link a source?
The Japanese have a captured shortened M2. That doesn’t make me want to add the PPSh-41 for the Event.
There is an archive that the PPSh41 and MP41 (r) were captured by the USA and even sent to the Aberdeen Proving Ground.
Since 1942, comprehensive tests of the PPSh-41 have been conducted here, including accuracy testing, reliability in extreme conditions, and comparisons with the American Thompson submachine gun. The Americans noted the exceptional rate of fire and survivability of the Soviet assault rifle.
Fort Benning (now Fort Moore), Georgia:
What was tested: Here, the weapon was tested for infantry use. Officers evaluated the convenience of the drum magazine and the EF.
Enough information?
I’d like a source I can read myself. The one you’re pulling from preferably.
Enough SMGs at BR 5? Where do you see them?
The archive is closed.
STG44 Kiraly43 M MKb42
Not an SMG
Not BRV
Not an SMG
The Kirali 43M submachine gun is very good, even the best in the 4BR
Nobody wants the PPsh-41 for Germany, we want the MP 717 for the TT, which is different from the PPsh-41, so it’s not a copy and paste.
Yet it is not BRV and thus not relevant to the Question. Also it’s not available to acquire.
The Western Allies have the saweoff M2 carbine? No
So it’s not copy and paste.
SMGs BR5? Germany doesn’t have any in the TT.
So Germany needs
Can you read? I wrote about Japan that the M2 was a sawed-off shotgun.
M2 Shotgun? What weapon are you talking about?
1 Like
Two are assault rifles, on is BR 4.
You should focus on other weapons, not the PPSh-41. For example, why haven’t you written about the G41 rifle’s required improvement?
Shotgun? Xd
I need to learn to read or you?