PPD-29 issue

Suggestions Weapons
1

image
image1314×24 4.87 KB

In game prototype of PPD have 44 rounds and its no sources - it have 44 rounds except wiki. But in a weapons armory encyclopedia other things
image
image1024×850 155 KB

Model 7/2. 7.62 mm Degtyarev system submachine gun “PPD-30”. Model of 1930 chambered for the Mauser cartridge.

The operating principle is a modified Degtyarev system, without a gas vent, with a fixed barrel. The bolt is locked by pivoting lugs which, due to the large bevels in the connection points with the receiver, allow the bolt to self-open after the shot.

Main characteristics of the submachine gun:

  • Magazine … DP machine gun type magazine for 50 Mauser cartridges;
  • Sights … Flip-up sight of the “Japanese type”, front sight with a protector;
  • Submachine gun length … 720 mm;
  • Weight without magazine … 3.2 kg;
  • Weight with magazine … 4.21 kg;
  • Weight of empty magazine … 760 g;
  • Weight of loaded magazine … 1.01 kg;
  • Sight radius length … 352 mm;
  • Rate of fire … 1200 rounds per minute;
  • Number of parts for field stripping … 12;
  • Number of parts for complete disassembly … 19.

The submachine gun was developed at the BNKiS (Design Bureau?) in 1930. The primary developer was V. A. Degtyarev.
Source: Inv. No. 2 p. 2; No. 619 p. 56; No. 767 f. 81.

So, bring a real bullet amount to this old timer and its real name - PPD-30.
Source https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X0iKFNYaHy_C9VJFNV0SVDOQJLNltM9f/view?usp=sharing

Bring a PPD its real stats
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
6 Likes
2

If the change is historically accurate then I support it!

3 Likes
3

Yes, I agree. But many people on the forum are biased.
Some guns could have higher and more realistic rates of fire, but they refuse to implement them, saying the current slow ones are fine.

I’ve even seen people claim that even if a round deals more damage on other weapons, balance should come before historical accuracy.
It’s just ridiculous.

2 Likes
4

Imo, historical accuracy comes first and then we could do things like lower damage and increase recoil for balance later

5

Yeah, changing damage values would also be pretty ahistorical.
You can’t expect a full-power rifle round to be worse than a semi-auto just for balance.

I think BR5 is already high enough — we should just give it the proper historical performance it deserves.

6

nah

7

You are don’t agree with any soviet thing don’t you? Except its a nerf

8

depends, I agree in other posts but this one not is needed

9

Dunno, we have 20-30 smg for axis at br2-3. I like its variety

1 Like
10

I come here again today to pay tribute to the departed.

1 Like
11

Not a bad idea - in order to honour decard, we could actually buff that gun. As a nice “good bye” present.

While at it, we move all SFR to the MG gunner class to honour wastedwoodsman.

And we nerf Gorov rifle into the ground, because apparently Greyparrots thought this gun is the most biased gun the Soviets have - despite almost no one using it because of its bad sights.

Okay jokes aside → when PPD actually had a 50 round mag and a RPM of 1200, why not change it?

1 Like
12

for a moment I thought Decard was unbanned

2 Likes
13

I kinda wish most perma bans would turn into 1 year temp ban max.

Yes alot of those banned people were annoying and didn’t really contribute much outside of complaining, but man decard wasnt all that bad - he made some good suggestions for sure.

2 Likes