6 Likes
Yes, this class is stupid. It’s like they want to try and bring the Lone Fighter players back to the game by offering a solo class
A squad with 1 soldier is ridiculous in the game about SQUADS
2 Likes
Listen to the players suggestion for infinite money Glitch = 
Listen to literally no one and make a spy class from tf2 = 
I mean, let’s be honest here.
ISO comment about damn jeeps outratioed the main thread with likes once again,
Is there more to say?
Guess begs the question what this forum is really all about when suggestions with tons of tractions ends up nowhere for years.
As a wise meme once said; “ R2, we need to be going up! Not down! “
8 Likes
“We hear you” and they proceed to add a thing no one ever asked for. At least you can’t kill what is dead.
2 Likes
Imagine how much revenue they have lost steering this ship like a drunken sailor. They could have achieved greatness just by following a few basic concepts, instead of becoming a “could have been”…
1 Like
The idea not only goes against the core of the game, it matches the departure from historic maps. We were given a fake “preference” section for maps. When do we get to see the results of the thinly veiled poll? Will the next roadmap off a cliff proclaim success too in such a false way? Instead of building on the successful parts they seem to dismantle it. You don’t shrink the box in order to think outside of it.
Have we decided?
4 Likes
From today on, Im dropping an AP mine on every friendly rally and in every doorway.
Go on, waste 5 minutes killing an enemy, steal his fit, hike behind our lines, only to be blown into pieces by my AP mine.
And the best part is that the little b!tch will know he deserved it.
7 Likes
The partisans could easily have had the mechanics, but we’ll have to see.
2 Likes
My problem with the addition of this class is that this game already suffers from a lack of collaborative effort. With a lack of communication between teammates, and with players doing their own thing. And this only encourages more solo play, and playing hide and seek and messing around. When they should be playing the objective instead.
I can see they tried to soften the blow by releasing the Dornier and the Cromwell. Which are cool additions, but it doesn’t change the fact that saboteurs were not asked for or needed. Not when there’s other priorities they should fix.
3 Likes
Anything but new nations.
2 Likes
ouch
3 Likes
Sounds very interesting, but not as interesting as adding minor nations (Such as Slovakia, Hungary, Romania etc.)
All of those participated in operation Barbarossa.
Since we are getting the new class of soldier which is tecnically a spy well…
We can probably now play among us if a mod is Made it would be hella funny to play enlisted but as among us
4 Likes
Where does this ‘21 man’ thing even come from? For instance, I don’t have any squads larger than 6 people at all. And even those 6-man squads are only that size because you can’t make them any smaller.
And why did everyone decide that if a Saboteur appears, there will be fewer people at the capture point? If I never went to the point even before Saboteurs, will I somehow take someone else away with me after they’re introduced?
The presence of certain classes doesn’t fundamentally change how players are distributed across the map.
If someone manages to actually use the amongus models from this picture and turn it into a playable mod - that would be insane.
Hmm, if I was a dev - I would consider something like this for next April fool event.
Not possible until we get custom content support from the devs which will probably never happen since they don’t care about modders
2 Likes