New battlefield - Omaha

Switching to low graphics while in the garage triggers a visual glitch. The track guards and additional armor on the vehicles are merely cosmetic. I once experienced severe network lag when loading in, and noticed these decorative track armor pieces disappeared entirely. Beneath them, the models are identical to the base version, leaving the hull looking quite bare.

They promised us these armors would be implemented soon. Clearly, they lack the technical capability to pull it off and have broken their word. Even though these add-on armors wouldn’t bring any substantial improvement to the tank’s protection, it’s still disappointing to see promises go unfulfilled. Don’t create these fake visual skins if you can’t deliver the actual content — it’s just self-deception.

It would be far better to add genuine Panzer IVs fitted with track armor. Then we could take three more hits when facing KV tanks and Shermans.

1 Like

Will they finally add the option to select which mission types you don’t want to play? Because Conquest mode on an even bigger map doesn’t sound very appealing. Even in confrontation modes, this has become problematic, as teams tend to simply wait for the enemy to capture an area and vice versa during more than one hour

1 Like

wtf major update so soon after last “major” update? is the game getting some love from devs finally?

5 Likes

Almost feels like we are back at the old campaign system era.

More maps have always felt like the biggest content addition to the game.

3 Likes

Man any tank can get killed by infantry thats literally like say that the jagpanther should be BR2 because you can kill It with the M1 bazooka

3 Likes

You can kill Tiger II with PTRS - its a BR1 tank obviously.

2 Likes

What new buildings are they even talking about? I’ve seen all these structures on the Berlin Railway map of the Eastern Front. In my opinion, it would be much better to make the coastal guns inside the bunkers operable.

Yeah and the BT-7 can kill It shooting on the back of the neck xd soo yes It should go to br1

1 Like

i cant deny some maps would be always one sided but still think that it shouldnt be such a big and insane difference

This is a videogame and unless you look for absolute military reamsemble go for it but for most ppl this will be annoying

i think that best devs can do when it comes to map desing is to add more cover and ways to sneak it so it still holds that defender adventage while it doesnt makes unssufreable to play as attacker cuz some maps and specially pacific ones are like this open field where you can get shoot from safe positions with no chance or figthing back that should be addresed and fixed not make all maps feel the same just trying to make all fun on their ways and no a “free xp” for a side thats what i mean with one sided maps

I’m going to be honest, I thought with the upcoming WT infantry that gaijin would abandon Enlisted.

But abandoned projects don’t get new maps…

So it seems it will really just be split between pre/during ww2 for Enlisted and post ww2 for WT…
I think.

Surprising but nice. We will see how it goes.

7 Likes

I`m going to ask you an honest question, answer it truthfully, Have you SEEN ANYONE using this damn tank? no like seriously? I dont see anyone using this

2 Likes

All the maps on this game are great, plenty of cover and other things to hide behind but what lets this game down in a big way is the kill cam…fire one shot and the enemy knows exactly where you are even if they can’t visibly see you hiding behind a bush or whatever…Not only that, also the cheats using apps to see through walls and trees. Tanks that shoot through buildings with no damage to the building it’s self…I’ve even encountered enemies that are bulletproof…fired a whole magazine from a Thompson into one guy, didn’t even slow him down while I was reloading he fired one shot without aiming and my soldier was dead…If it wasn’t for the cheats, this game would be perfect…Getting rid of the kill cam would be a step in the right direction…absolutely pointless being a sniper if the game tells the enemy where you are hiding

2 Likes

But sooner or later there will be nothing left to update, I hope it can be produced until 1976.

It still has its users, though only a small number of players pick it. Stat-wise, I think this vehicle is ready to be moved down to BR1, which is in desperate need of buffs. Tanks there are extremely slow, and the maps are cluttered with obstacles that further hinder their movement. The road wheels have basically become a downside. Honestly, using this is worse than taking the Panzer III M.

New vehicles will definitely be released less frequently, but maps have endless potential.

They could simply keep rolling out new maps in the years ahead.

1 Like

World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War all made extensive use of World War II weapons, but also had new Cold War gadgets: firearms, tanks, jets, and helicopters.

So you’re a developer who’s been hanging out on the Russian forums? What a rare sight!
So, about those buildings on the maps—the ones that already appeared on the East Berlin / Eastern Front maps, plus the stables and wells that were already in Normandy—can they be replaced in the future? We’re really tired of seeing the same old stuff.

We never know.

The trend nowadays is to make re master, or re release (final fantasy 7 as example).

A better example: Conan exiles. It was as good as dead, with nothing left but a predatory fomo battle pass going… then out of the blue it resurrect, for a lack of a better term, and get updated with new fresh graphics and features. And funcom (ah! It’s tencent, really) already have Dune going.

Maybe Enlisted is lucrative for gaijin and they decided it’s worth keeping alive as a niche ww2 game.

I don’t know more than anyone what will happen to it, but apparently, it’s not yet ready to have “it’s plug pulled”

1 Like

You know that he means the Jagpanzers no?

We also haven’t gotten many maps like Poland or Italy anway.

1 Like