Whoa, that’s not what I meant. I was just talking about the St.Pz. II. I got confused there for a second.
Oh, you mean that small tank with a 50mm gun mounted on the Panzer II chassis? It’s also an open-top vehicle. Too bad. I really hoped it could be moved to BR1.
Right now BR3 is overwhelmingly strong, so BR2 needs buffs to keep up. But BR2 is heavily held back by BR1, meaning it can’t get too powerful. That’s exactly why the St.Pz. II has to go to BR3. Given that, we should push for an assault gun that fits BR3 perfectly — and that’s definitely the Brummbär.
The current meta is pretty stale. They could at least add those open-top 75mm tank destroyers, like the SU-76 and the Marder series.
Wish we could address this “soon”, too much Anti-tank ammo is wasted/not being used as this is an infantry game, infantries everywhere its either HE, HEAT or MG to counter them, I just hoped that there would be an option for allocating the amount of ammo we wanted and however we like.
wish we could allocate it like this cause, the enemy can and sometimes rarely uses only 2 tanks in the game simultaneously which means you cant even encounter them all the time, so what do you gonna do with a 42 AT ammo? when HE or HEAT is whats mainly used against infantry
Also this, I did not see ANYONE, I mean literally anyone use this tank destroyers in the game, it would be helpful if they get moved to BR 2 or 3, this game is an infantry game, infantries everywhere that can use AT weapons, this thing is literally helpless
so please reconsider this, also the “legacy squads” I hope that we can buy them too just like the Chinese has access to them after the merge, because whats the point of them being in the files if the players specially the new ones that just joined dont have access to them, its not fair
nope, overpowered? sheit cant even see properly without the commander sticking out or just finding a high ground for this Tank Destroyer tank, were not talking about just tanks here, the Enlisted game is all about every little thing to everything, Planes, Infantry and tanks can kill this thing, hit one of its tracks and its gone, and seriously, I DO not see anyone use this even at BR 4-5, whats the point of having this in the TT if its just going to rot or collect dust in the game, might as well throw it in the new players and up to them what they intend to use the Tank destroyer for
That’s right. The suggestion to swap the StuG III’s APCBC shells for HEAT got the green light two weeks back.
The request to adjust ammo for the Japanese Type 2 Ho-I was approved about 90 days ago. I think giving players the option to pick their own ammo is ideal. The sIG 33 b could then run entirely on HE shells.
Having access to more squads is a fantastic update. Lots of us own different tank skins, so I can make two squads running Shermans and Panzer IV Gs. We can’t do a three-tank cycle, but if the first tank gets taken out, the second can jump in right away to hold the line. It works the same for planes too. Anyone who’s beaten the Normandy map can deploy two Ju 188 bombers now.
More importantly, I hope we can switch between squads and battle rating rosters without having to change vehicles. We could simply equip different BR tanks on separate squads. It seems the devs have noticed this issue. They no longer grant new vehicle access to legacy squads that were phased out long ago. That’s why the Cromwell and 105mm Sherman now have to share the same squad slot. It’s similar to the situation for German vehicles: you can only pick one slot for either the sIG 33 b or the StuG III N.
Just like what I just said, The game has infantry and planes and tanks, did you really think the players are stupid enough to confront an enemy tank frontally? look at the armor, fking thing would be destroyed by a M1 Bazooka
And it seems fair to me, it’s a good thing to differentiate from other games, but yall still have to rely on historical photos (also aerial) if possible, because right now the current D-day maps and the Pacific maps, what should they represent to me? It’s pure fantasy
whats the point of bringing historical accuracy into the game when the merged happened 3 years back, that historical accuracy is nonsense now, sheit some players would bring italian tanks to normandy which in the records they are ofcourse not present
This tank has no turret, and only its frontal armor is decent. I truly believe it belongs at BR3 alongside the ISU-152. This way, Germany will finally have a vehicle that can stand up to the KV series.Considering that the American Hellcat has been moved down to BR3 and is no longer a threat, I can’t help but wonder when Germany will receive a similar adjustment for this vehicle. It has been waiting for quite a long time since the map consolidation.
We do have skins but gaddamn, the devs said a few months back that this wont just be skins but a viable part of the tank as well, guess they didnt follow up on what theyve promised, I mean look at this
The tracks add additional armor but the sand bags are just decorations
also this, we got this a few months back and the devs said they do something about it and now its the end of may and we still got nothing
Historical accuracy is no longer a priority. Game balancing is the sole focus of all adjustments. The general setting is loosely based on history, and most vehicles are authentic World War II models. However, a couple of Japanese tanks at BR5 are blatant exceptions. One Tiger variant was never officially fielded, and another is entirely fictional. Some players keep criticizing others over historical inaccuracy while turning a blind eye to these facts. They apply double standards purely to serve their own agenda.
