This tank has no turret, and only its frontal armor is decent. I truly believe it belongs at BR3 alongside the ISU-152. This way, Germany will finally have a vehicle that can stand up to the KV series.Considering that the American Hellcat has been moved down to BR3 and is no longer a threat, I can’t help but wonder when Germany will receive a similar adjustment for this vehicle. It has been waiting for quite a long time since the map consolidation.
1 Like
I think its nice!
But what i think the gamers would realy love, its Itally maps like Anzio, Monte Cassino, Sicily!
5 Likes
We do have skins but gaddamn, the devs said a few months back that this wont just be skins but a viable part of the tank as well, guess they didnt follow up on what theyve promised, I mean look at this
The tracks add additional armor but the sand bags are just decorations
also this, we got this a few months back and the devs said they do something about it and now its the end of may and we still got nothing
3 Likes
Historical accuracy is no longer a priority. Game balancing is the sole focus of all adjustments. The general setting is loosely based on history, and most vehicles are authentic World War II models. However, a couple of Japanese tanks at BR5 are blatant exceptions. One Tiger variant was never officially fielded, and another is entirely fictional. Some players keep criticizing others over historical inaccuracy while turning a blind eye to these facts. They apply double standards purely to serve their own agenda.
We already said this gives extra armor in game, it just doesn’t show up on the xray
5 Likes
I argued for a more authentical game mode seperated from merge before ,
Maybe Enlisteds needs a more Historical and authentical mode? - Archive / Suggestions - Archive - Enlisted — official forum
Maybe i need to do part 2 of this?
1 Like
I’m not talking about that
I just logged in without problem
oh, just hope the xray gets fixed soon, it leads up to misunderstanding and unnecessary worry, also thanks for the reply
Switching to low graphics while in the garage triggers a visual glitch. The track guards and additional armor on the vehicles are merely cosmetic. I once experienced severe network lag when loading in, and noticed these decorative track armor pieces disappeared entirely. Beneath them, the models are identical to the base version, leaving the hull looking quite bare.
They promised us these armors would be implemented soon. Clearly, they lack the technical capability to pull it off and have broken their word. Even though these add-on armors wouldn’t bring any substantial improvement to the tank’s protection, it’s still disappointing to see promises go unfulfilled. Don’t create these fake visual skins if you can’t deliver the actual content — it’s just self-deception.
It would be far better to add genuine Panzer IVs fitted with track armor. Then we could take three more hits when facing KV tanks and Shermans.
1 Like
Will they finally add the option to select which mission types you don’t want to play? Because Conquest mode on an even bigger map doesn’t sound very appealing. Even in confrontation modes, this has become problematic, as teams tend to simply wait for the enemy to capture an area and vice versa during more than one hour
1 Like
wtf major update so soon after last “major” update? is the game getting some love from devs finally?
5 Likes
Almost feels like we are back at the old campaign system era.
More maps have always felt like the biggest content addition to the game.
3 Likes
Man any tank can get killed by infantry thats literally like say that the jagpanther should be BR2 because you can kill It with the M1 bazooka
3 Likes
You can kill Tiger II with PTRS - its a BR1 tank obviously.
2 Likes
What new buildings are they even talking about? I’ve seen all these structures on the Berlin Railway map of the Eastern Front. In my opinion, it would be much better to make the coastal guns inside the bunkers operable.
Yeah and the BT-7 can kill It shooting on the back of the neck xd soo yes It should go to br1
1 Like
i cant deny some maps would be always one sided but still think that it shouldnt be such a big and insane difference
This is a videogame and unless you look for absolute military reamsemble go for it but for most ppl this will be annoying
i think that best devs can do when it comes to map desing is to add more cover and ways to sneak it so it still holds that defender adventage while it doesnt makes unssufreable to play as attacker cuz some maps and specially pacific ones are like this open field where you can get shoot from safe positions with no chance or figthing back that should be addresed and fixed not make all maps feel the same just trying to make all fun on their ways and no a “free xp” for a side thats what i mean with one sided maps
I’m going to be honest, I thought with the upcoming WT infantry that gaijin would abandon Enlisted.
But abandoned projects don’t get new maps…
So it seems it will really just be split between pre/during ww2 for Enlisted and post ww2 for WT…
I think.
Surprising but nice. We will see how it goes.
7 Likes
I`m going to ask you an honest question, answer it truthfully, Have you SEEN ANYONE using this damn tank? no like seriously? I dont see anyone using this
2 Likes