Not really P-47s were responsible for much more damage including into 44-45 when they were slamming luftwaffe airfields
Including 44-45? They weren’t fighting the Luftwaffe before 44.
1 Like
P-47s were most definitely fighting the luftwaffe in 1943 to 1945 they we still performing bomber escort mostly in 43 but they would carry ground pounding ordinance so if they werent intercepted they would peel off when they got into france and basically do hunter killer missions if it was german and on the ground they slammed it
1 Like
Major don blakselee part of the 4th fighter group scored the p47s first air victory against a fw-190 on the 15th of april 1943
1 Like
Even at 6 HVAR + 500lb P-47 is going to be the best attacker plane in the game. What are your contenders?
Ju-188/Tu-2S that fly like bricks?
Or BR4 Ki-83 with 2x100kg bomb?
Not to mention that US has plenty of really good equipment, there’s no need for them to have neither broken (like it currently is) nor even the best planes (Like they would have even after both Meteor and P47 nerfs)
1 Like
That just emphasizes HE spam
Vehicles are just a part of this game as infantry… why should they get more content for infantry spam?
I can give tips on improving your aim with it because TF shell works, but it has a very small trigger radius I imagine for “balance reasons” which is nonsense because the skill ceiling is already very high to use this in the AA role considering the slow traverse. But… when you do land a hit 90% of the time insta kill.
You’ve already nerfed the Meteor’s bombs, and now this plane? Wouldn’t it be better to check out the jet bombs on the Japanese and German planes?
I can give tips on how to write something that people are willing to read.
I dont need your advice.
The Ju-188 is fine, not the best not the worst. The Tu-2s the just there Ju-188 but better, calling it a flying brick is indicating that you don’t know what a good plane is. And the Ki-83 is an effectively a fighter plane, not an attacker, meanwhile the Kikka is effectively an attacker and not a fighter.
I have a sneaking suspicion that when y’all begged and cried until the Meteor got nerfed, people just started using the P-47 more as a result. And now y’all are begging and crying for the P-47 to get nerfed but you haven’t learned your lesson.
Why beg for stuff to get nerfed when you should be begging for larger scale changes to the vehicle system. High tier AA guns, a score requirement to spawn in vehicles, F2P squad slots so people are more likely to spawn in a fighter to shoot down a problematic aircraft, etc etc.
Skill issue
I’ll give my 2 cents anyway out of spite kiddo!
You aim to the edge of the lead indicator not the center and crew perks should be reloading speed and reload time retention ignore jets you can’t track them fast enough attackers and prop fighters are Ideal.
How original
1 Like
OG 2016 cussing
1 Like
Ah yes, because calling a plane with significantly lower top speeds a flying bricks definitely makes me uninformed on what makes great planes in Enlisted
I dare you to enlighten me regarding this issue
Especially after saying this. You want to tell me that Kikka is effectively an attacker? Since when? It’s one of the better flying Jets out there. Ki-83 being effectively a fighter - sure! Too bad it’s a fighter with 2x100kg bombs. Meanwhile P47 is effectively a fighter but with 10 HVARs and more bomb power in that singular 500lb than those 2x100KGs lol
Even the distinction between attacker/fighter rather than just taking in plane dogfighting, energy conservation and bombload capabilities is just plain obvious you have no idea what you’re talking about
Already did
‘Guys just use more aircraft to deal with the aircraft HE spam problem’ lmao
1 Like
The kikka has low ammo count which makes it struggle as an effective fighter that can actually screen multiple targets you get one maybe two good fights from those 100 30mm rounds and then you have to turn back which goes into his point about how its effectively an attack aircraft because it has the largest bomb for japan while the ki-83 is the exact opposite decent amount of ammo and flying stats but no real bomb load
The Tu-2s can effectively chase down prop aircraft while also being able to outturn jets, an IL-2M or a Dauntless are more along the lines of a flying brick. Not to mention that the 20mms are better for shredding planes in a dogfight plus it has tail gunners. I would take the Tu-2s over the P-47.
Also yes I would consider the Kikka effectively an attacker, the low ammo count on the 30mms and the fact you can drop an 800kg bomb every 45 seconds means that you have to play around the resupply. Also no duh America is gonna get better planes than Japan, no duh America is gonna get better planes than every other nation, they’re the plane faction.
Also how is the P-47 effectively a fighter? You brought up energy conservation and then use it to call a plane with terrible low altitude energy conservation a fighter? Really?
If vehicle combat is just HE spam to you then maybe Enlisted isn’t the game for you.
Preach the US mains will continue to drop bombs until morale improves
I’m not even a U.S. main, I’m just not braindead