They are all anti tank. they all have quick reloads and good pen. and they face thinner armor than japan does
no i have not if the grant and lee are anti infantry tanks that leaves one br2 tank left that has tissue paper for armor, now if you remove any he shells and make it a pure anti tank, tank then yes its br2.
can you name any turreted long barreled 75mm tech tree enclosed turret tanks in any faction
One tech tree if you want to make the chi nu br2’premium id vote yes
Chi nu 61-47-60mm crusade 30-40mm
oh wow youre still making up armor stats? chi nu has maybe 53mm of armor. crusader has a quicker reload a stabilizer a coax machine gun better mobility and still isnt that good for br 2. and you saying a chi nu br 2 premium is ok but not a chi nu br 2 tech tree is dumb as shit. full stop.
1 Like
no the chi nu has plates 50mm thick those are effective armor values the chi nu has sloped armor
just like the chaffe has 24mm thick plates with 50mm effective
i used the armor viewer in enlisted
what sloped armor are you talking about??? literally posted screenshots
its that way with everything premium, event battle pass can be better than tech tree i didnt make the rules i just follow them
dog youre clowning yourself rn. if its ok in br 2 as premium its ok in br 2 as tech tree
dog youre clowning yourself rn. if its ok in br 2 as premium its ok in br 2 as tech tree
ok then by those rules its not weak enough to be bp, tech tree, even or premium br2 if one is equal to all others, sorry if that confuses you
at this point my only logical conclusion i can make about you is that youre an ameriboo who is desperate not to let japan get an actually adequate tank. you keep ping ponging from excuse to excuse that i have repeatedly dismantled. And heres the thing: You dont need just one adequate reason, you need multiple as this is talking about balance. balance is a spectrum and as more of your arguments are dismantled, the less strengths you can talk about and the more balanced your version of the chi nu is. you started off with chi nu as this tank with great armor and this god tier cannon, now all you have is a tank with bad armor and an alright gun
you started off with chi nu as this tank with great armor and this god tier cannon, now all you have is a tank with bad armor and an alright gun
thank you i was sweating
at br3 its an alright cannon
at br2 its god tier
the m3 cannon is alright
the chi nu cannon is great
but please say the m3 cannon is equal please say something that stupid
Chi nu is too strong for br 2 guys!
The same guy T28 super heavy br4
definitely not bias
that was spite its only br4 in the universe that the ferdinand is br4
1 Like
hard to tell as it seems like you genuinely know nothing about tank balance. you literally went into this discussion with incorrect armor values and gun performance and somehow still think you know better
and i admitted i was wrong i though the chi nu was not designed by drunken sailors, but its universal the m3 cannon is dog water
the chi nu cannon is worse than the m3 cannon…
thank you, thank you
i was feeling bad for myself
yeah you got the armor thing spot on
until the last moment i was feeling a fool, but you pulled defeat from the jaws of victory
thank you
thank you
the m3 cannon of the sherman has a better reload, better angle performance, identical flat pen, same he performance and better performance at range. the only thing chi nu has is aphe filler. and 66 graqms is enough to one shot pretty much anything unless its a heavy tank or youre doing a cupula shot.
youre so desperate to be right for once its kinda pathetic
on paper, in practice just about everything bounces it
again thank you, oh and name calling which of us is desperate