What do you guys who have been around the game for a while think will be the remaining levels? Squads, vehicles, weapons etc. ? Just fun speculation, it is my personal favorite campaign
Also, is it not viable for the devs to have a premium sniper squad? Or are they just holding out until Stalingrad lol. They seem to make a premium for every other squad type except them?
I just don’t think there’s a lot of space for one, outside of maybe Allies in Tunisia.
What rifle would they get? We’ve already got basically every sniper/marksman rifle from the powers we have in game, except for Lee-Enfield conversions, and those might get added to Tunisia as Sniper III weapons.
you could be right about snipers I am stirring the pot a little to see what people think and maybe I learn of some obscure rifle that is not yet implemented . I have not used snipers too much until Tunisia so it made me curious .
You played CBT ? Any ideas in general for Moscow campaign levels ?
I’m not really sure. I only play the allies in every campaign but tunisia, mind, but there’s some stuff I’d like to see for Moscow. Mostly, I’d like to see assault squads or MG squads with the Federov Rifle, and I’d like to see a T-34. Obviously the Germans would need something to compensate, but the t-50 is already armored basically as well as the T-34 and they don’t have much trouble hurting that.
Honestly still things to add, like tanks, pz4 variants, kv1, early t34, maybe sdkfz222/221, tank destroyers like stug, su76, marder… Not sure bout weapons and squads tho. They could extend Moscow to Stalingrad or Kursk and just dubed this “Eastern front” or smth.
Maybe there will be other campaign rewards thrown in I dunno.
It’ll probably get put in if they want to add TDs to both sides, then again they put the Wolverine in Normandy where it’s outgunned and basically useless.
I’m down for more PzIVs and PzIIIs, but most every axis player i’ve suggested that to hates the idea. I’m opposed to heavy tanks in this particular infantry game, too hard to balance, too hard to fight against if they’re camping greyzone. The armored car would get wrecked by even the T60, but TDs would be interesting. I think we’ll probably get F34-armed T34s, and it’s gonna cause some backlash from axis mains unless they get effective HEAT for the 75mm armed Panzers and Stug.
It’s just names. Keofox specifically said the Normandy campaign is meant to represent all of Operation Overlord, but it would be nice to see that stated clearly in the game somewhere.
Operation overlord ran from June-August 1944, most Jumbos would have been built before it started. Were they at the beach? No. Took part in the operation? Yes.
U say armored car would be wrecked by t60-welp yes but armored car is not supposed to dight tank directly, and just look at Tunisia-got 2 armored cars and british one is the one useless here(at least if ap rounds will get propper spalling effect).
Wolverine outgunned? How? Stuart has 37mm, sherman has 75 that has worse anti tank capability, puma has 50mm, pz3N has short 75 and u say wolverine is outgunned…
Because it is outgunned by the Axis counterpart - the German KWK42 in the Panther is seriously better than the M7 3-inch in the M10 - plus the Panther has seriously better armour, and isn’t open topped.
You might think this balances out Jumbo vs Pz-IV - but that doesn’t stop the M10 being seriously outgunned by it’s “equivalent” axis vehicle.
At least with the Jumbo vs Pz-IV the Pz-IV had a better gun.
And T-34’s in “Moscow” wil be blanaced by Pz-IV F2/G I reckon - like hte Sherman vs Pz-IV in Normandy hte Pz-IV is vulnerable enough to the Soviet 76mm that it’s much better gun is not a great advantage.
If they’re being historical for say, Operation Barbarossa, since the Battle of Moscow is the tail end of that, the PzIVF2 wouldn’t be present. The KwK40 L/43 gun was a response to Soviet armor during Barbarossa, and didn’t make it into tanks until '42.
That said, I’d still be glad to see it in Moscow for the axis. If we allies get the t-34, axis needs something that can pen it that isn’t poorly modelled HEAT.
The F2 comes in about March 42, so if the campaign was actually “Barbarossa to Case Blue” then it would be fine
One oddity that isn’t in WT so won’t be here is they initially were going to upgrade the F1 with a 50mm L60 gun - at least 1 prototype was made - expect to see it in WT some day
M10 is not panther counterpart so why even campare the two , m10 should not engage directly but make ambush attack, side shoots and that things… Not 1v1 panther at the distance-if u do that u are just braindead and should uninstal cuz u clearly have no idea how to play. It’s not world of tanks with health bars…
U just pointed urself that jumbo outperforms pz4… Yah it does, and so the panther outperforms m10. There is no rock paper scisors here, it’s not that kind of a game. It’s like to say that mg42 should be nerfed cuz u have no chance facing in the open on mid range… no sense at all. Learn to use what u have effectively instead of crying that u cant pen panther… U could at least guess that u should be able to pen turret… And go around and kill it. Maps are big, I don’t get ppl that go face on straight under enemy fire.