Modify TKB-264-42

Increase the ammunition of the TKB-264-42 from 50 rounds to 100 rounds, and then change it from BR4 to BR5.

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
3 Likes

Another overpowered LMG for soviet BRV? No.

3 Likes

I like having BR4 guns

2 Likes

USSR mains cant get enough bias.
Screenshot 2025-01-08 113655a

8 Likes

You two don’t get it, he’s trying to restrict the BS soviet weapons to BR 5, while making this one no better than an RD-44.

No problem they reduce MG -43 -100 to BR IV and they can have it TKB-264 with 100 rounds xD

im a soviet mains and i love the idea lol

1 Like

Yea, this weapon runs through 50 rounds fast.

I’m all for it. Besides it’s a BP weapon that I rarely use.

Having 100 rounds may make me have interest in using it.

1 Like

I think it would be better to keep things as they are. Currently, gamers are either concentrated in BR 3 or BR 5. The number of players in BR 1-2 is greater than that in BR 4. Therefore, I hope to place more powerful equipment in BR 4 of each faction to attract more players to play.

Let’s focus on the German arsenal first. They have two belt-fed machine gun options: the full-power MG42 with the 100-round belt and the MG81, both freely available as tech tree weapons.

In contrast, the Soviet side mostly relies on the RPD-44, which is essentially an oversized PPSh. As for that flawed Tokarev model, a personally designed failure even its own designer disapproved of, its in-game performance is downright underwhelming. It’s just like a regular Madsen without any buffs.

Even if this weapon gets moved to BR 5, its accessibility will stay limited since it’s a battle pass reward, barely impacting the overall meta. You’ll rarely spot more than one or two Soviet players wielding it in a match, and its overall prevalence still can’t compare to the MG42 100-round variant.

Compared to other battle pass weapons, it is far from overpowered or meta-breaking. What’s more, adjusting it out of BR 4 would practically relegate it to BR 5 anyway. The current BR 4 meta is already unbalanced, and several weapons in this bracket deserve stat tweaks to match BR 5 power levels.

This is by no means bias against Soviet weaponry. I also have balance adjustment suggestions for firearms of other nations, proposing buffs or BR reassignments to BR 3 and BR 5. It’s common knowledge that vehicles at BR 3 can still fight back against BR 4 opponents, while BR 4 equipment stands almost no chance against BR 5 opponents.

1 Like

After all, it is a battle pass weapon, so it won’t be widely owned. As a result, players will rarely encounter it in matches, meaning it won’t greatly disrupt the game balance.

The core advantage lies in its belt-fed design. Unlike drum magazines and box magazines, belt feeding frees it from strict ammo capacity limits. Given its belt-fed mechanism and the fact that this machine gun is modeled after the MG34 general-purpose machine gun, I believe equipping it with a 100-round belt would be the most reasonable setting.

1 Like

Ok so scotti can get 25 rd discussion ended.

2 Likes