Super Pershing has no problem penetrating the King Tiger
I don’t really want to get into weapons with you because we already know we won’t agree there, the conversation is on vehicles and we all know the game has developed has ported them from war thunder which prides itself off historical representation, thus making enlisted vehicles also historically represented.
With what logic you are implying “historical” approach to vehicles while the arguably most played part infantry doesnt ?
Also the sherman jumbo never was used on d-day but yet there it was in game.
So your “Historical” approach is quite biased towards murrica.
Which is a lot since 13 seconds is one of the best turn times in the ENTIRE GAME.
The buff does not matter if it’s still outclassed by every mean by the Meteor. I wonder what did US do to deserve such an overpowered plane
The German 500KG bomb is about 9% stronger in terms of blast radius, 15% stronger in terms of fragmentation radius but has 20% less fragments. But because Meteor rocks 2 of those it has 82% stronger blast radius, is 68% better in terms of fragmentation radius and is 2.4x better in terms of total fragments
Spare the copy and paste because what you’re saying is just pure delusion.
FYI if you have the Meteor 2x500LB AN-M64 bombs it would still cover more radius than 1x500kg SC-500k by 30%. Only when you count in ENTIRE AMMO BELT for the 30mm cannons of Me262 it gets ever so slightly better air to ground capabilities but the difference is still lesser than just comparing 2x500lb and 500kg
1 Like
In that sense you want to leave enlisted historical but T20 and Super Pershing are historically accurate
It’s not even close. Why are you trying so hard here? That’s literally like saying well the 262 can still shoot down and kill the meteor. Which it can by the way, the better pilot will usually win even with a shit aircraft.
And in war thunder it’s an 8 second difference! Lol!
Thanks for proving my point about the bombs. German bombs have significantly more fragmentations.
You are the only person who is defending meteor in the whole community and I am trying hard Lol
And Super Pershing has no problem penetrating King Tiger
When I say historically represented, I’m referring to the real life counterparts and not whether or not it was used in the war. Enlisted would be a shit show if so, because you can’t reproduce certain things like germany’s shortages, and not every man using an stg/fg42.
I can promise you I’m not biased toward any one nation. I can show you all the premium squads I’ve bought for all nations and have by far spent the most on germany. Probable close to a thousand usd at this point in the game in total
You significantly decrease the lead pursuit distance and allow planes to catch up to you. Most BR5 planes are fast enough that to stall them you need a whole lotta whiff on their side before reaching high enough altitudes. Enlisted maps are just too small to take advantage of Jet speeds in 100% capacity, which leads to ‘get forced to merge → die’ situation. You can’t even outrun most of them to create enough space for a turn if they are resilient enough to keep following you
In dogfight it is almost impossible 17.64s turn Vs 13.57s turn only if you catch the Meteor player off guard
1 Like
Like T20 is better than FG42 II? Like Hyde is a direct upgrade to Stg? Or how the Americans got a Super Pershing to equalize against the KT?
Well atleast GE had stg’s or FG42’s.
Yet they are “Balanced” so that murricans can also have fun with theyr fantasy weapons.
The word fantasy, should ring the bells that your “historical” approach is quite highly biased.
Lol, now I know you’re a german main if you can’t admit the king tiger is far superior. Just because the pershing can pen on the cheek doesn’t mean the king tiger isn’t the far better tank.
Again, it’s not defending the 13 second turn time, it’s defending the turn time compared to the 262. They’re completely seperate things and stands on it’s own.
Id say you have better chance with pershing against tiger than with ME against Meteor.
All planes must have their turn rate standarized
It’s not Even realistic at all to beggin wtih
Like i said we won’t agree on the weapons and the meaning of historical representation. I have no interest in playing a game where germany gets hyper inflated to the max with all the new technology in endless supply while the u.s. gets stuck in 1943 never advancing it’s own technology because “the war ended (just before they could)” this however doesn’t mean i want an exact copy of the fg42 for the u.s. i would be more inclined to say the hyde was a bit much but feel the t20 was warranted for the state of the game and it’s lack of true HA
Okay so unhistorical murrican things are fine because “I have no intrest” but for some reason your argument towards ridiculous meteor is “history”
You do understand that you are literally cherry picking here with your history arguments ?
Super Pershing is penetrating King Tiger easily you have skill problem