Super Pershing has no problem penetrating the King Tiger
I donât really want to get into weapons with you because we already know we wonât agree there, the conversation is on vehicles and we all know the game has developed has ported them from war thunder which prides itself off historical representation, thus making enlisted vehicles also historically represented.
With what logic you are implying âhistoricalâ approach to vehicles while the arguably most played part infantry doesnt ?
Also the sherman jumbo never was used on d-day but yet there it was in game.
So your âHistoricalâ approach is quite biased towards murrica.
Which is a lot since 13 seconds is one of the best turn times in the ENTIRE GAME.
The buff does not matter if itâs still outclassed by every mean by the Meteor. I wonder what did US do to deserve such an overpowered plane
The German 500KG bomb is about 9% stronger in terms of blast radius, 15% stronger in terms of fragmentation radius but has 20% less fragments. But because Meteor rocks 2 of those it has 82% stronger blast radius, is 68% better in terms of fragmentation radius and is 2.4x better in terms of total fragments
Spare the copy and paste because what youâre saying is just pure delusion.
FYI if you have the Meteor 2x500LB AN-M64 bombs it would still cover more radius than 1x500kg SC-500k by 30%. Only when you count in ENTIRE AMMO BELT for the 30mm cannons of Me262 it gets ever so slightly better air to ground capabilities but the difference is still lesser than just comparing 2x500lb and 500kg
1 Like
In that sense you want to leave enlisted historical but T20 and Super Pershing are historically accurate
Itâs not even close. Why are you trying so hard here? Thatâs literally like saying well the 262 can still shoot down and kill the meteor. Which it can by the way, the better pilot will usually win even with a shit aircraft.
And in war thunder itâs an 8 second difference! Lol!
Thanks for proving my point about the bombs. German bombs have significantly more fragmentations.
You are the only person who is defending meteor in the whole community and I am trying hard Lol
And Super Pershing has no problem penetrating King Tiger
When I say historically represented, Iâm referring to the real life counterparts and not whether or not it was used in the war. Enlisted would be a shit show if so, because you canât reproduce certain things like germanyâs shortages, and not every man using an stg/fg42.
I can promise you Iâm not biased toward any one nation. I can show you all the premium squads Iâve bought for all nations and have by far spent the most on germany. Probable close to a thousand usd at this point in the game in total
You significantly decrease the lead pursuit distance and allow planes to catch up to you. Most BR5 planes are fast enough that to stall them you need a whole lotta whiff on their side before reaching high enough altitudes. Enlisted maps are just too small to take advantage of Jet speeds in 100% capacity, which leads to âget forced to merge â dieâ situation. You canât even outrun most of them to create enough space for a turn if they are resilient enough to keep following you
In dogfight it is almost impossible 17.64s turn Vs 13.57s turn only if you catch the Meteor player off guard
1 Like
Like T20 is better than FG42 II? Like Hyde is a direct upgrade to Stg? Or how the Americans got a Super Pershing to equalize against the KT?
Well atleast GE had stgâs or FG42âs.
Yet they are âBalancedâ so that murricans can also have fun with theyr fantasy weapons.
The word fantasy, should ring the bells that your âhistoricalâ approach is quite highly biased.
Lol, now I know youâre a german main if you canât admit the king tiger is far superior. Just because the pershing can pen on the cheek doesnât mean the king tiger isnât the far better tank.
Again, itâs not defending the 13 second turn time, itâs defending the turn time compared to the 262. Theyâre completely seperate things and stands on itâs own.
Id say you have better chance with pershing against tiger than with ME against Meteor.
All planes must have their turn rate standarized
Itâs not Even realistic at all to beggin wtih
Like i said we wonât agree on the weapons and the meaning of historical representation. I have no interest in playing a game where germany gets hyper inflated to the max with all the new technology in endless supply while the u.s. gets stuck in 1943 never advancing itâs own technology because âthe war ended (just before they could)â this however doesnât mean i want an exact copy of the fg42 for the u.s. i would be more inclined to say the hyde was a bit much but feel the t20 was warranted for the state of the game and itâs lack of true HA
Okay so unhistorical murrican things are fine because âI have no intrestâ but for some reason your argument towards ridiculous meteor is âhistoryâ
You do understand that you are literally cherry picking here with your history arguments ?
Super Pershing is penetrating King Tiger easily you have skill problem