Question is why are Normandy and recently even Berlin not suffering (much) from lack of Axis players?
Or differently asked: Whats the point of Moscow Axis? The Panzer IV?
2 Likes
LOL “come back when you meet the standards”. Dude thinks hes a top player when hes complaining about Moscow Allies
3 Likes
It’s not a fighter, it was used as a fighter against STUKA’s but let’s go with it. It’s a fighter with heavy bombing capabilities, and beats BF-109 and is good against all ground targets.
Your axis counterpart is Stuka, which has 500kg bomb? It has no fighting capabilities whatsoever against any Allied plane?
Allies have better air. It’s okay.
Axis have GRB so the allied tanks can be better in tank vs tank. It’s okay.
Allies have better guns, too? 
Ugh, there isn’t an inbalance here?
1 Like
Because in those campaigns you don’t have to grind to something interesting. Axis has all its most interesting and famous toys. You know, axis mains were saying how they suffer in berlin not so long ago, while having the same meta shit they have now.
What happened? More players joined axis, and they magically started winning.
1 Like
Normandy is always filled, its the default for most people. Berlin I’m assuming because King Tiger?
now THATS a good and fair question
1 Like
Quite contrary, I have no intrest to become or pretend to be e-sport enlisted star as you seem to be.
I just want balanced game thats all.
1 Like
dont take much of smart to stay out of range of grb or reverse once hit.
The fact that your offering this as solution in imbalance between tanks just proves how biased you are.
What a lovely game, I should only play stuka and grb as they are the equipments which are better than soviets.
Yeah good one.
1 Like
I have no interest in that, Enlisted is way too casual for a competitive scene. I make guide videos for people to get better at the game. Maybe check them out, theyd probably help you
3 Likes
It has pretty high range.
You also can’t play PTRS or Pe-3 because they are worse than what axis has.
What’s next?
1 Like
Nothing stops you from using ptrs.
Dont worry, everything else is better on soviet side you can use them.
Oh except LMG ofc, which conveniently is shit for everyone.
Nothing stops you from using Pz4.
Of course it is dude.
Okay, I’m finally going to sleep. Bye-bye, keep coping.
1 Like
Well, ptrs, ptrd, every plane with rockets and ofc every tank. Most effectively the T-50 and T-34 does stop using pz4 rather easily.
Good night cupcake, bestestes E-Sport fantasy dreams for you.
Ehh Aside from the plebs who were too retarded to kill T-34s with the Panther… the FG in Normandy didnt face much notable counter until the Yankees got the HnG M1919. The best was the BAR and maybe the M2. In Berlin they face PPD and PPSh and DT and the Avtom. Not really entertaining. Aside from that the last stuff Axis got in Berlin aside from the KT and the Scoped STG was pretty decent apart from the Tiger.
I dont know how attractive it sounds to face better SMGs, better MGs and a more or less competitve SF (Avtom) with the FG (II)/ better SF but its pretty meh for me. At least now they truly rule tanks and scoped ARs so its more or less even I guess.
Its decent and Axis have more advantages than they have in Moscow.
1 Like
Also because its more what I understand of “asymmetrical” (or whatever the devs understand there) balance (Germans have better tanks , panzerfaust and smg and the Allies better mgs and planes and good early and mid stage stuff like the Jumbo and PIAT). Berlin was constant flip flop but yeah… one tank can make the difference.
1 Like
Exactly!
For basic chap - and there’s nothing but basic chaps here due the casual nature of the game - in Moscow the axis is the underdog and has nothing to gain. If there’s asymmetricality here, what’s the point in Moscow Axis?
There is none.
It should be balanced out.
"ITS NOT UNBALANCED LOL COPE
OK UNBNALANCE EXIST BUT WHAT ABOUT BERLIN???
NO UNBALANCE EXISTS! PRAVDA!
4th time: Choose and stick with what narrative are you going to go with?
1 Like
That is not what was said at all. That interaction was “Whats the point of playing Moscow? Theres nothing they have that the other campaigns dont”.
1 Like
The imbalances has been presented now quite few times.
Well thats partially true as well, moscow lacks proper counter to pretty much everything.
again that conversation has literally nothing to do with balance, its completely separate lmfao
1 Like
I’m glad one or two peple realize that. Those saying the campaign is balanced are a bit… hypocrites. Or just don’t really know what’s going on.
If we had 10 vs 10 matches filled with human clones, all with the exact same abilities, that are all at the exact same campaign levels, Soviet side would win pretty much all the time. Their equipment is simply better and easier to use.
Historically sound, yes. But certainly not balanced. Might be why there’s so many complaints about it.
3 Likes