Or I can use it as it is.
3 Likes
Okay, let’s take that. What about accuracy? The rocket’s accuracy was around 1.1% historically - in the game it is 100 (you hit where you aim). Not relevant?
Can the Stuka have rockets, then, too if realism or historical accuracy is irrelevant?
1 Like
T-34 and T-50 weakspot is their turret.
That is because they were made that way.
Armor thickness, angles, and way shells work are modelled according to documents.
No, bad steel quality, bad production quality, breaking suspension/gears/engine aren’t modelled, because that will be purely random and lead to frustration of all players, because that happened to all tanks more or less.
Any questions?
3 Likes
It was shit because it was an unguided rocket with poor accuracy, not because it had poor penetration. The M8 rocket was also a shit rocket that wasn’t really used, and yet the P38 is arguably the best anti tank plane in the game.
ah yes, just what I’ve always wanted in my video games! A 1 in 100 chance to hit! Such fun!
1 Like
So it’s okay that they are unbalanced? That they are unbalanced? You see where this is heading, don’t you? Without Ad-hominem?
1 Like
So it’s game-wise OK for the germans to have such too? Or is it just treats for the Allies and Twigs for the Axis? Is that balanced?
1 Like
I’d rather say that only late war productions of German tanks had these issues, regarding the steel quality. Until then the face hardened steel plates used on german tanks would get more efficient, whereas the soviets had hardened their plates completely and that way too high which resulted in cracking and spalling armor during the whole war. After war produced T-34s finally get rid of these issues.
2 Likes
Is it okay for germany to have what? They have plenty of a-historical things. You think Stuka bombers dropped bombs on a dime the way you can in game?
1 Like
Well it actually had rather shit penetration as well. Especiatly the rockets used in moscow campaign.
Technically capable to destroy pz2 or T38 max at direct hit.
yes its important that soviets have fun, not others.
1 Like
One class shouldn’t be perfectly equal. Pz4 is better against infantry, for example. GrB is better against T-34 than PTRS is against Pz4. And stuka kills T-34 easier than sb-2 kills Pz4.
Balance can be asymmetrical, AND balance is mostly about players, not equipment.
2 Likes
Soviet tankz had those issues
German tanks had
American tanks had
Italian and british tanks were a pure dogshit
But those things aren’t modelled even in games like postscriptum, so…
1 Like
Yup so did the M8, and yet the M8 can nuke Panthers/Tigers from the front.
Idk what to tell you guys. Weird how all the veterans and top players think Moscow is fine and yet theres always that small group of players who cry about how unbalanced it is. Maybe take a second and think about the common denominator in your games
Well thats good argument.
Germans get better AT rifle, total game changer infact far better than T-34 which can pretty much sit on hill and kill everyone.
And thats just bullshit. All you need to do is shoot rockets to spotted tanks thats it.
And due to prolonged markers its rather easy task.
1 Like
So take your fucking AT rifle and kill it. It pens T-34 from the front. And T-34 can be burnt down after one hit, just like they did irl. Is that enough?
Or you can take your stuka and kill the tank. Any problems with that?
2 Likes
GRB is good - and Axis only real answer to T-34 and T-50.
PPSh is still without recoil and IL-2 is still better than anything what axis has.
SB-2 kills all axis tanks without sweat. Plane vs tank is no problem with any bomb (unless you land a direct hit to T-34 because 50kg bombs bounce away, perhaps a bug, perhaps a feature, I don’t know) - but this is about having Rockets AND Bombs against EVERYTHING. Unrealistic, and unbalanced.
There’s inbalance in the game - Moscow - which makes the standard axis player in a handicap compared to Allied players.
You agree to the inbalance in other posts and ridicule then in another. It looks like you have an agenda here.
1 Like
I quite often do. Problem arises when the T-34 driver has higher IQ than room temperature.
You will get it eventually.
Well I cant take stuka if ive got tank selected so yes.
1 Like
I think it’s time to bail dude. These two are delusional. “Cope” is overused but god damn is it appropriate here
2 Likes
Ah yes “everythink fine cause I can kill bots and fail to understand the imbalance when both teams has players with IQ over room temperature”
yeah please, bail and come back when you meet the required standards.
1 Like
First - it is not. It’s more of a fighter than attacker.
Second - 250kg bomb is much easier to use than rbs-82.
So you have an answer after all. Isn’t that enough?
You don’t see where you’re aiming, it has terrible manouverability, and 100kg has much smaller radius where they kill tanks than 500kg or 250kg.
So you have a problem when tank driver is smarter than you?
Then don’t select the tank, you just said that it suffers.
1 Like
I wanted to go to sleep already. But there’s someone wrong in the internet and I can’t sleep with that.
Or I can.
2 Likes