Except at 10 you down people, but whatever.
Yeah, pretty sure the 150 rounds saved more lives than the ability to down people with one shot.
And having 10 more rounds is OP, which is why the MkB42 with 15 rounds is in BR3 and the 35 with 20 rounds at BR2… wait what?
For what reason exactly?
I have 2 of them, and they’re really awesome, I wish I could have 2 more so I could make a full set. (I also need 2 more MKB42Ms for the BR4, hopefully we’ll see an event about that)
And yes, comparing assault rifles is basically difficult. Because the only faction that has assault rifles outside of BR5 is Germany. However, I don’t find the MKB35 a great basis for comparison. And like I said, an assault rifle in BR1-3 in TT ruins everything. Even if it’s not really strong, it paves the way for other factions’ paper assault rifles. You can quickly see Fedorov 10-15 rounds in BR2-3 in TT.
You probably have to shoot at very close range? I don’t know how often it happens.
Well, I never said I agreed with that decision, they should have given it the real 10 round magazine and sent it to BR1.
Giving more weapons with that power is controversial. It’s like trying to give the Soviets something like the RMN50.
Of course I’m speaking from my own experience, I don’t know if other people know that weapon very well. But I know the MKB35 much better at medium range than anything in BR2-3 and it works at close range too, not very well, but it will keep you satisfied.
Anyway, I don’t want to continue this discussion, they didn’t even bother to send MKB42 to BR4, so I don’t think anything will change.
In some sense I agree since one is event / box weapon and one would be TT weapon.
But regardless, seen some what frequently Mkb35’s since the event & silver box but so far havent seen a single topic moaning about them. Atleast not anything to taken seriously.
BR1 should have been locked along the BR5 quite a time ago.
But, since the 42 would be BR3 it would never fight BR1.
Theres already the paper SA in soviet arsenal that outclasses all other BR2 SA rifles.
And could very well compete even with BR3 SA’s if it had more rounds.
Im kind of expecting it already.
For some odd reason the soviets just have to get little bit better everything along the BR’s.
KT2 being sole exception.
And there really isnt anything in GE BR3 to write home about.
Soviets got the “unique” burb gun, KV’s.
While the GE has adequate at best smg’s.
More often than 100m+.
But Mkb35 works because 10 rounds less is somehow not powerful?
Or body armor, or PPS42, PPS43, Uraga, or KV1 or…
But nope, a MKb35 with ten more rounds is overkill.
Well, they never stated never so far.
Because the Soviets have the RMN50 and that’s why they’re quiet. And nobody cares about Japan and America. Did you get the answer?
Well, I meant BR1-3 weapons, not battels. I meant that if Germany gets an assault rifle in BR3 in TT, the Soviets will ask for Fedorov 10 and 15 rounds in BR2 and BR3.
So why do you want to make things worse? At least now they use historical weapons like PPS and PPSH, but if assault rifles like Fedorov 10-15 are added, the battle of Moscow will become the battle of Fedorov. XD
It’s a bit difficult to discuss the KV and BR3. But overall I believe what makes Germany weak there is not the SMG or tanks, but the G41, I hope they fix that problem soon, because the SVT38 is too powerful against the G41.
And does that mean that the damage at 50 meters is no different from 1 meter? I didn’t know that!
I didn’t understand what you meant.
Uragan in BR3 is basically a ZK with worse accuracy. The KV1 is not really powerful in BR3, the main problem is that the German BR2 anti tanks have trouble dealing with it. So I agree with adding the Panzerfaust 30 to BR2. The PPS 42 is balanced against the berretas, but I can’t speak with confidence about the PPS 43.
And about body armor, I definitely agree with removing its effect.(Also, Japanese katanas shouldn’t have a speed boost)
Im my mind, MkB would fit perfectly well into BR4, despite its close range dps is actually on BR2 levels.
It still is an AR, and has its usage despite low rate of fire in the form of mid range sustainable fire.
And should be, its by far most pampered faction anyway.
Didnt these 2 factions recently get rather massive buffs on low br ?
Tommy & JP weapons got absolutely tarded buffs to compete with soviet smgs.
They probably ask T90 and AK12 too. But wouldnt it be time already for devs to put big boy pants on and not to fold for every silly ass soviet request ?
Which both are better than theyr counterparts by large margin.
Except I dont see a single reason why soviets would need assault rifle.
They already have by large margin better SMG’s & SA rifles in both BR 2&3.
and Horn STG!
Oh yeah, horn was even worse right? Under 500 rpm is so painful to use…
I was talking about people, not developers. You should have figured out by now that the favored faction of developers is America.
If the Germans get a BR2-3 assault rifle, I can give the other factions the right to read their own examples.
Why not? BR1!
Late producion G41 had variants with different scopes, those could be added without taking away from the premium’s uniqueness.
Simon says: it will be. An event one
Murrica doesnt exactly fight soviets and regardless 30 round tommy at BR2 for example, can be argued to be OP as fk atleast it has downsides which is the extremely slow bullet and imo rather poor sights making it not so great option at longer ranges.
PPS doesnt have either of the issues, its just all-around great without downsides.
Because ?
Soviets get the ultimate bully KV’s, best SA at BR2 and even at BR3.
Soviet smg’s are by large margin better than what GE has.
So for what exact reason would soviet need a single AR ?
Sure I get your point that the pampered faction ppl would moan about it.
But how about not folding on every silly demand they make 
It depends on which model you’re talking about. The PPS42 is perfectly balanced with the Beretta M38/42. The Beretta has more damage(6.8 - 4 vs 6.7 - 3.4) and 5 more round(40 vs 35), and the PPS42 has a bit more RoF(690 vs 630). But I have to be skeptical about the PPS43. Anyway, I find the PPS42 better than the PPS43 due to its easier control, but I don’t think everyone agrees with me.
And don’t forget their LMGs are much worse than German LMGs. And the Germans have 75mm cannons that reload in less than 4 seconds, they’re almost like an autocannon. XD
I agree about the semi autos, and I’m a fan of the G41 buff. I gave my opinion on the BR2 SMGs. And I find the PPSH41 Box to be a great gun to waste bullets on, especially after the nerf.
And the correct comparison would be beretta vs pps43 as arguably both are the end of the line.
True, perhaps we could give soviets something else unique and equally useful as LMG’s ?
Bayonets to sniper rifles ?
PZ3N I assume ? Unfortunately its not going to fare very well against KV’s.
Except it wasnt nerfed.
It was fixed. That thing was comparable to Stg44.
Well, like I said, I can’t give opinion on the PPS43, it just annoys me that people complain about the entire PPS series when the Germans have a weapon very similar to the PPS42. So if you have a problem with PPS 43, don’t complain about all PPSs.
This is a funny joke.
and PZ4 F1 in BR2.
I remember people asking for the MKB42 H in BR3 because of PPSH 41 Box accuracy, but now that it’s “fixed” as you say, I don’t know why this discussion is brought up again. Of course, mains, no one stops them. I wish there was an option to kick all mains out of the forum. XD
Still there is OVP and Beretta for 1000+ rof. Complainers about sight just funny - I aint use a scope while I`m fight at the close mid distance + boys have a skill issue
Yes, people underestimate them and Owen mk1.
