Problem is too compressed BR.
That and the unhistorical weapon matchmaking that follows is what’s shit with it
Erma… feels jealous
Pure logic. Thompson for 20 rounds at battle rating 2. Thompson for 30 rounds on battle rating 3. Thompson for 50 rounds on battle rating 4. And then finally on the fifth battle rating. You get the Hyde. Everyone is happy
1 Like
four stars weapons
sorry, we sometimes forget you are very new here.
Guns used to have more stars.
But the gun is still same regardless of less stars.
What do you mean, 2021-th newbie? I know this old bug, aint know someone still have it
My sophisticated guess would be this screenshot is from that time you clearly didnt know existed.
But I forgive the ignorance, new players…
I meant MKB42 H.
My point.
Mkb35 is better than Mkb42(h) in almost every aspect saved for magazine but 10 rounds isnt that much to justify why it would be evil to put the 42 to BR3 when a gun is already existing at BR2.
1 Like
RoF and recoil are better. The only thing is that the damage is a little worse. Also, as I said:
The irony is that people asked for it themselves. These topics were very popular on the forum. Some people just don’t know what they want.
1 Like
400 / 500 both are below the sweetspot 600-800.
Granted it is faster.
Differency is 2. I repeat, 2.
You can justify that tiny differency with tiny differency of dispersion being better for mkb35.
One could argue the GE smg’s are already obsolete compared to others.
Kiraly being sole exception at BR4 and even that has rather high recoil.
1 Like
It is also more accurate, similar to StG vs. Mkb.
Calling recoil better when it is just 2 points is barely worth mentioning, and the 150 higher ROF is also not much better.
Like, it comes down to the magazine, smg, and maybe accuracy.
The 10.0 damage is not much on first glance, but it usually allows you to take down people with one hit.
stuff and BR1-3 becomes completely contaminated with fake stuff. (We all know that assault rifles make SMGs obsolete)
“Most” ARs (all two or three of them) in low BR have low magazine size, RoF, and some of the low BR SMGs even have comparable accuracy for whatever reason.
Even in high BR, some SMGs such as Cönders, PPSh, 100rd Thompson, or the 150rd Soviet SMG are arguably fine sidegrades for ARs, especially since ARs are already outperformed by battle rifles.
Better nerf Gever43 and BR3. No matter what you do with the Gewehr 41, it doesn’t have a sniper scope version, unlike the Gewehr 43.
1 Like
I suppose I have squad with a sniper G41
That’s why this won’t be in the TT now, just like the Lewis gun in the US.
Don’t forget that the MKB35 is a very good weapon in BR2, guess how much people would have shouted if it was a TT!
ZK is a really good weapon, I don’t know why you think it’s so bad?
And well, there’s something wrong with BR2, I won’t deny that.
Well 9.6 and 10 are not that different. And a 30 mag and better RoF can make a big difference.
And basically comparing it to MKB35 is a bit wrong. We can take BR3-4 SMGs to BR2 compared to Type1 SMG(BP).
Ive got 1 (one) from recent events. Its ok, in those niche situations I need to shoot to over 50m and for those cases in every each one of my squads has MG / AT & Engi with rifles so its not really a game changer.
At CQC its absolute trash, and far as I know only assaulters can use the Mkb35 so I dont really find it as useful as people claims.
For Gorilla ? I guess it could work.
But at the end of they it doesnt do anything the assaulters are supposed to do better than the regular beretta.
Every gun does the job, but my point more or less was some guns does the job better than the others.
And compared to other BR3 smg’s the ZK definitely aint best option.
It doesn’t matter to me. The German semi auto problem just needs to be solved… by any means necessary.